Recommended Posts

I liked the premiere. Jamie and Arya are my favorite characters to watch, and they both had strong scenes in this episode.

 

Daenarys is becoming incredibly annoying to watch though. She's moving on to free yet another city of slaves. I realize the show is following the books, but come on. She was doing this throughout the entire last season. It's getting really old at this point.

 

Anyone know why Daario was re-cast?

I liked the premiere. Jamie and Arya are my favorite characters to watch, and they both had strong scenes in this episode.

 

Daenarys is becoming incredibly annoying to watch though. She's moving on to free yet another city of slaves. I realize the show is following the books, but come on. She was doing this throughout the entire last season. It's getting really old at this point.

 

Anyone know why Daario was re-cast?

Supposedly something to do with the next Transporter movie since the previous actor is in that.

I liked the premiere. Jamie and Arya are my favorite characters to watch, and they both had strong scenes in this episode.

 

Daenarys is becoming incredibly annoying to watch though. She's moving on to free yet another city of slaves. I realize the show is following the books, but come on. She was doing this throughout the entire last season. It's getting really old at this point.

 

Anyone know why Daario was re-cast?

 

I suspect lots of people will have the same reaction to Daenerys' storyline just because she takes a detour, both figuratively and literally. Which is too bad, because it's not all uninteresting and lot of it builds her character. Look at it from a positive perspective, at least you didn't wait 11 years to see what she does like the people who waited on the last book :D The show will most likely catch up to her book storyline next year either way.

 

And yeah, regarding Daario, Ed Skrein is the new Transporter and most likely gave up on the show to work on that.

 

Now regarding the episode, I think this was the strongest season opener of the past three seasons. Lots to do with Arya and The Hound's bit, 10 quality minutes to end the episode with.

Awesome news. Hopefully more people watching = HBO gives them more money to work with = they include more visually challenging stuff. I mean, we're starting to see the aftermath of the war, and while it lasted we pretty much saw only one battle.

This episode was a great opening to the season. I will say that

The reforging of Ice right before the intro was very sad to me. I'm glad the Lannister's are going to get what's coming to them, hopefully as soon as next week! Also, holy crap Drogon is big!

Yes, it was.

 

But regarding the intro, nevermind, it's the same. I compared the "shadow" from previous intros of the 3rd season, and it's also there. It's just the shadow from those "ring things" around the Sun. Just wishful thinking, I guess. Those previews put that image in my head, hehehe.

Are the TV producers going to start making stuff up now? Martin is taking is sweet time finishing the books. Pretty soon the TV show is going to run out material.

 

Although, I wouldn't be surprised if Martin is holding out on finishing the books so that HBO pays him big money. The TV show is extremely popular, I doubt HBO would let the show fizzle out for a few years waiting for Martin to get off his ass; and he probably knows this.

Are the TV producers going to start making stuff up now? Martin is taking is sweet time finishing the books. Pretty soon the TV show is going to run out material.

 

Although, I wouldn't be surprised if Martin is holding out on finishing the books so that HBO pays him big money. The TV show is extremely popular, I doubt HBO would let the show fizzle out for a few years waiting for Martin to get off his ass; and he probably knows this.

 

They've got this season, and next season at the very least before they catch up to whats currently written. Could be more. The Winds of Winter will be out before next season (hopefully) so that adds at least one season, if not two. So he has 4 years to finish tWoW and write A Dream of Spring.

I heard on the radio this morning on my way to work (don't know the source they used) that the producers are going to start changing things to "keep it interesting". Anyone hear anything about that?

 

They've been saying it (and kinda doing it) for a while now, it's just that the people reporting it blow it out of proportion. There are details that get changed, less important characters get trimmed or merged, there are timelines that get moved around, some storylines get expanded and some get shortened, but so far they have kept each and every one of the important moments from the books practically intact. I remember actors saying last year that the season was going to be full of shocking surprises for the book readers, but I honestly don't remember a single change that would have a lasting effect on the story.

They've been saying it (and kinda doing it) for a while now, it's just that the people reporting it blow it out of proportion. There are details that get changed, less important characters get trimmed or merged, there are timelines that get moved around, some storylines get expanded and some get shortened, but so far they have kept each and every one of the important moments from the books practically intact. I remember actors saying last year that the season was going to be full of shocking surprises for the book readers, but I honestly don't remember a single change that would have a lasting effect on the story.

Yeah I know they have been doing that. For some reason, I interpreted the announcement on the radio that they will be doing something more radical. Just curious if my immediate reaction had any truth to it.

 

I, for one, am getting tired of waiting for Daenerys to return to Westeros. So my immediate thought/hope was the producers are going to hurry and make that happen sooner than it does in the books.

 

It doesn't happen at all in book 3, so it's not supposed to happen in season 4. So that means we'll need to wait another year (at least) to see that happen if they stick close to the book. (lame) I wonder if the producers are worried about having too many story lines take too long, and losing live viewers in the process.

Yeah I know they have been doing that. For some reason, I interpreted the announcement on the radio that they will be doing something more radical. Just curious if my immediate reaction had any truth to it.

 

I, for one, am getting tired of waiting for Daenerys to return to Westeros. So my immediate thought/hope was the producers are going to hurry and make that happen sooner than it does in the books.

 

It doesn't happen at all in book 3, so it's not supposed to happen in season 4. So that means we'll need to wait another year (at least) to see that happen if they stick close to the book. (lame) I wonder if the producers are worried about having too many story lines take too long, and losing live viewers in the process.

 

Again, I don't see any major changes coming, because major changes like Daenerys arriving sooner than in the books would change the entire story so much they'd probably have to write everything from scratch.

 

Regarding Daenerys, it's not that bad, really

 

This is the season she decides to stay in Meereen so I see a lot of people bitching about it, but as soon as next year it's going to pick up interest again because of a certain someone heading her way. Not to mention the end to season 5 and her arc has the potential to put her back on the badass side. And let's be fair, it was obvious from the get-go she'd take her sweet time, considering the dragons actually have to grow up before she lands in Westeros (ideally).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!