Recommended Posts

Except for the simple joy of watching Joffery finally bite it, his death was really unsatisfying. Definitely not worthy of all the awful things he has done up to (and including) the wedding. I was hoping for something more brutal and direct. And the worst part is, they will probably play the mystery card for a while which is just frustrating.

 

Thats how its written in the books ...

And? Just because it's taken directly from the books doesn't mean it wasn't unsatisfying.

 

You're right, but its pretty pointless to complain about. That event was written in 2000. Joffrey's death is less about it actually happening and more about what it sets in motion - the Purple Wedding is the beginning of the end of the saga where the Red Wedding was the end of the beginning.

You're right, but its pretty pointless to complain about. That event was written in 2000. Joffrey's death is less about it actually happening and more about what it sets in motion - the Purple Wedding is the beginning of the end of the saga where the Red Wedding was the end of the beginning.

I haven't read the books, so I didn't know what was supposed to happen. Diverging from the source material isn't unheard of, but I get what you're saying. And I agree. His death has definitely messed up Tywin's plans, and it will probably have some major fallout. I was just really hoping for his means of death to have more "oomph".

I haven't read the books, so I didn't know what was supposed to happen. Diverging from the source material isn't unheard of, but I get what you're saying. And I agree. His death has definitely messed up Tywin's plans, and it will probably have some major fallout. I was just really hoping for his means of death to have more "oomph".

 

The suspects for who did it aren't aren't really the 'stick 'em with the pointy end' type.

 

Out of curiosity, what part of CT?

I have my guesses as to who did it, but I'm fairly certain it wasn't Tyrion. It was pretty obvious that he was framed. Honestly, my best guess is that Cersei did it. But as long as the show explains, without a doubt, who did it I'll be fine with whomever.

 

Out of curiosity, what part of CT?

Southington.

I have my guesses as to who did it, but I'm fairly certain it wasn't Tyrion. It was pretty obvious that he was framed. Honestly, my best guess is that Cersei did it. But as long as the show explains, without a doubt, who did it I'll be fine with whomever.

 

Southington.

 

Cersei? Interesting theory. Not one I've really seen before. Although some things from the book that were made a big deal were barely even hinted at in the episode. Wonder what scenes hit the cutting room floor.

 

Ah, not far. I'll be working there tomorrow... My office is in Hamden, I'm from West Haven.

Other than Joffrey attempting to have him murdered by a Gold cloak during the battle of Blackwater (to name but one example)?

 

And the incident you're referring to was before Joffrey was King and had any real power with the only person who witnessed it being the Hound.

Cersei? Interesting theory. Not one I've really seen before. Although some things from the book that were made a big deal were barely even hinted at in the episode. Wonder what scenes hit the cutting room floor.

 

Ah, not far. I'll be working there tomorrow... My office is in Hamden, I'm from West Haven.

NIce, it's good to meet a fellow Neowinian so close.

 

But as for Cersei, I think she doesn't want to give up her Queen Regent power. (made obvious by her actions in this episode) Maybe by killing Joffery before his marriage to Margaery was consumated, it means the marriage isn't valid. Which would mean Joffery's younger brother is now heir to the throne, leaving Cersei as Queen Regent until her other son is old enough to marry. But that's all based on the assumption of how marriage rules work in Westeros. I have no idea if that's how it works or not.  :rofl:

But as for Cersei, I think she doesn't want to give up her Queen Regent power. (made obvious by her actions in this episode) Maybe by killing Joffery before his marriage to Margaery was consumated, it means the marriage isn't valid. Which would mean Joffery's younger brother is now heir to the throne, leaving Cersei as Queen Regent until her other son is old enough to marry. But that's all based on the assumption of how marriage rules work in Westeros. I have no idea if that's how it works or not.  :rofl:

 

Not a bad line of reasoning. #TryingToWalkAFineLine

Fantastic episode.


I have my guesses as to who did it, but I'm fairly certain it wasn't Tyrion. It was pretty obvious that he was framed. Honestly, my best guess is that Cersei did it. But as long as the show explains, without a doubt, who did it I'll be fine with whomever.

 

Southington.

 

 

My money is on Sansa

when she gave Tyrion the cup.

It was Margaery and her grandmother.

That was my first thought, but then Margaery had no control over his antics with the goblet and no real opportunity. Tyrion had no way of knowing the little psychopath would decide to focus on him either. I figure Sansa has probably been walking around waiting on an opportunity.

Suppose the poison could have been added to the cake rather than the wine.

 

He did comment about it being dry?

The death of a certain character this episode almost makes up for the killing off of my two favorite female characters in the last season.

I'm no literary snob, but though I am quite enjoying Game of Thrones, I could not imagine sitting down and actually reading it.

NIce, it's good to meet a fellow Neowinian so close.

 

But as for Cersei, I think she doesn't want to give up her Queen Regent power. (made obvious by her actions in this episode) Maybe by killing Joffery before his marriage to Margaery was consumated, it means the marriage isn't valid. Which would mean Joffery's younger brother is now heir to the throne, leaving Cersei as Queen Regent until her other son is old enough to marry. But that's all based on the assumption of how marriage rules work in Westeros. I have no idea if that's how it works or not.  :rofl:

 

Waterbury here

 

I still have the sneaking suspicion that either Cersei or Tywin did it, they were loosing control of Joffrey and we know Cersei has a thing against Margery, and seems hell bent on going against Dad and how better to do that then becoming the full queen once she's disposed of the "interloper" 

I'm thinking that it could have been any of them, but I think my vote goes for Sansa, Joffrey has been really bad to her, killing Ned, Killing her Dire Wolf and then the rest.

 

I wouldn't be at all surprised if we find that it was Sansa, she usually sits at events rather quietly but she seemed to make a hell of a point of wanting to leave. Just thinking :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft finally admits its default Windows 11 25H2, 24H2 action broke key legacy component by Sayan Sen Microsoft last week released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. So far the company has acknowledged two known issues that have popped up after the release which include bugged-out Office apps as well as the Recycle Bin; though there could be more at play too. Speaking of bugs and issues, Microsoft seems to have finally acknowledged a problem that probably has been around for close to a year. That's because back in July of 2025 the company made a default change to the latest Windows 11 versions, wherein it switched to JScript9Legacy on Windows 11 24H2 and later releases. Hence following the release of version 25H2 in October 2025, JScript9Legacy also remained default-enabled. As a result there has been a compatibility issue ever since then. For those wondering, by switching to JScript9Legacy Microsoft intended to improve the security of modern Windows PCs by reducing vulnerabilities tied to legacy scripting like cross-site scripting (XSS), among others. XSS exploits can allow cyber-attackers to attach malicious code onto legitimate websites and use them to execute the code when a potential victim loads such a website. Hence the new JScript9Legacy engine enforced stricter execution policies and improved object handling, which should help mitigate such attacks. Microsoft today has published a new support article detailing the problem. Neowin spotted it while browsing. The company says that JScript global definitions and execution context may fail to persist across scripts, potentially breaking older dependent apps and web-based components that relied on this legacy behavior. In the article Microsoft has confirmed that the issue stems from its move away from the older jscript9.dll engine in favor of jscript9legacy.dll. As mentioned above, while the newer engine was designed to address vulnerabilities and strengthen security it also changes how JScript handles execution context. As a result functions and definitions loaded by one script could no longer remain available to subsequent scripts once execution ended. The company notes that some applications worked correctly on earlier Windows versions because the older JScript engine automatically retained global definitions and execution state between scripts. Under the newer model though that behavior is disabled by default causing certain legacy workloads and polyfill-dependent scripts to fail. Microsoft says it addressed the problem via the KB5077241 update though the fix had not been enabled automatically in the following updates. As such admins must explicitly turn on persistent JScript execution context using a Registry setting that the tech giant shared today. The configuration can be applied to individual processes or system-wide through the FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE registry key. The steps have been outlined below: Run the following command to create the feature control registry key: reg add "HKLM\Software\Policies\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main\FeatureControl\FEATURE_ENABLE_PERSISTENCE" Under this key, create a new DWORD (32-bit) value. Configure the value as follows: To enable persistence for specific processes only: Set the value to 1 for each target process name. To enable persistence for all processes: Add * as the key name and set its value to 1. You can find the official support article here on Microsoft's website.
    • The possibility that milk gathers back into a glass implies that gravity can be 'reversed'.
    • VidCoder 12.20 by Razvan Serea  VidCoder is a DVD/Blu-ray ripping and video transcoding application for Windows. It uses HandBrake as its encoding engine. Calling directly into the HandBrake library gives it a more rich UI than the official HandBrake Windows GUI. VidCoder can rip DVDs but does not defeat the CSS encryption found in most commercial DVDs. You’ll need the NET 8 Desktop Runtime. If you don’t have it, VidCoder will prompt you to download and install it. The Portable version is self-contained and does not require any .NET Runtime to be installed. You do not need to install HandBrake for VidCoder to work. Feature list: Multi-threaded MP4, MKV containers Completely integrated encoding pipeline: everything is in one process and no huge intermediate temporary files H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, MPEG-2, VP8, Theora video Hardware-accelerated encoding with AMD VCE, Nvidia NVENC and Intel QuickSync AAC, MP3, Vorbis, AC3, FLAC audio encoding and AAC/AC3/MP3/DTS/DTS-HD passthrough Target bitrate, size or quality for video 2-pass encoding Decomb, detelecine, deinterlace, rotate, reflect, chroma smooth, colorspace filters Powerful batch encoding with simultaneous encodes Customizable Pickers to automatically pick audio and subtitle tracks, destination, titles and more Instant source previews Creates small encoded preview clips Pause, resume encoding VidCoder 12.20 changes: Updated HandBrake core to 1.11.2. Download: VidCoder 12.20 | 47.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Portable VidCoder 12.19 | 89.3 MB Link: VidCoder Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      592
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      185
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!