Recommended Posts

I enjoyed that episode!

I think it was Margary, as she gave Tyrion a look as he took the goblet. Margary also seems to be plotting or has some mysterious plan which she is putting into place, much as Tywin does in the Lannister family.

My money is on the king's fool.

 

Before everyone else knew what was going on he told Sansa she had to quit now if she wanted to survive. He probably knows something. He might be Sansa's accomplice or acted alone. Looks like he is in love with her.

 

I did not read the book so all this is just speculation from myself.

If you watch the episode really thoroughly, you can see who is behind it. I've read the book, but the following spoiler is based only on what I think a very observant viewer might deduce from the aired episodes, so if you want to know what you could know at this point, read on, otherwise wait for the following episodes.

 

When Olenna talks talks to Sansa about Robb, you can see that she carefully removes one stone from her necklace. She then either puts the stone into the cup herself or she has Margery do it. I believe the later because she didn't have enough opportunity to do it without someone noticing. From previous episodes we know that the necklace is a gift from the fool, so what we know from all aired episodes is that Olenna, the fool and probably Margery are all behind it. But whose idea was it? Definitely not the fool's, he is just a drunkard. Olenna definitely has a good reason and Margery too, they obviously knew that Joffrey is a monster (Sansa told them in the previous season). The question is where did the fool get the necklace? And why didn't he give it to Olenna directly? There might be some major player behind all this conspiracy.

  • Like 3

If you watch the episode really thoroughly, you can see who is behind it. I've read the book, but the following spoiler is based only on what I think a very observant viewer might deduce from the aired episodes, so if you want to know what you could know at this point, read on, otherwise wait for the following episodes.

 

When Olenna talks talks to Sansa about Robb, you can see that she carefully removes one stone from her necklace. She then either puts the stone into the cup herself or she has Margery do it. I believe the later because she didn't have enough opportunity to do it without someone noticing. From previous episodes we know that the necklace is a gift from the fool, so what we know from all aired episodes is that Olenna, the fool and probably Margery are all behind it. But whose idea was it? Definitely not the fool's, he is just a drunkard. Olenna definitely has a good reason and Margery too, they obviously knew that Joffrey is a monster (Sansa told them in the previous season). The question is where did the fool get the necklace? And why didn't he give it to Olenna directly? There might be some major player behind all this conspiracy.

 

 

Here it is in pics :)

 

http://imgur.com/a/2DtPH

  • Like 2

Im excited to see Ayra back this coming episode. I haven't read the books but from what I've seen of her throughout this series, she is becoming one awesome bad-ass. 
I just hope she doesnt die :( 

What a great episode last night. Finally

Littlefinger

makes his appearance and

immediately discloses his involvement in the death of the Good King Joffrey.

 

Also the ending sequence was fantastic too. I can't believe how fast the episodes fly by as you are watching.

Last night's episode was weird. I loved watching it and I felt it ended too fast, but when it was over I couldn't recall anything exciting happening.

 

Daario had a sweet Achilles (Troy) moment in last night's episode though.

Last night's episode was weird. I loved watching it and I felt it ended too fast, but when it was over I couldn't recall anything exciting happening.

 

Same here, thought the ending was kinda abrupt as well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!