Recommended Posts

I'll give my thoughts of the Season 5 finale:

Stannis: I don't think he's dead. I think Brienne spared him, not able to go through with the execution.

Sansa and Theon/Reek: I think they'll continue to try and escape but Ramsay will hunt them down. I think Theon will sacrifice himself to allow Sansa to flee, and then she'll meet up with Brienne.

Jon Snow: I think he's dead, but I think that Melisandre will now think that Jon Snow is the actual rightful king and use her power to bring him back to life.

Araya: I think she's undergoing another test/punishment for the murder she committed, but she'll survive.

New King's Guard: I think he's The Mountain, as we didn't see him die.

Daenerys: I'm not too sure, but I think she'll be held captive again.

But I need someone to root for. I need someone I can, at least marginally, relate to or empathize with.

I find myself agreeing with this. And I just mean personally. That's the reason I stopped reading the books. While the story telling is great and all that I found out with these books (I didn't know this about me before) that I personally need someone to root for, follow (well, I also need the story to move faster, hehe). So I know that a lot of people love the books but I found out that they are just not for me. Must be becuase I got acustomed to reading so many thrillers.

WOW! I was not expecting that ending although I fully expect the red headed woman to bring him back to life with the lords light :D

 

I felt that the whole Stannis plot was very rushed though and a pretty crap way to end his story.

WOW! I was not expecting that ending although I fully expect the red headed woman to bring him back to life with the lords light :D

 

I felt that the whole Stannis plot was very rushed though and a pretty crap way to end his story.

 

This seasons content should have spanned two seasons... nuff said

The thing is, they can't really say he is coming back as it would spoil the ending/cliffhanger then :p

Yeah I guess. But it seems pretty clear that even Kit says "i'm not coming back"  doesn't get much more clear than that? And for what, next season "haha troll face, I lied" ? lol.

 

Also, the dude cut his hair, I know wiggs can be used, but imo that was his way of getting rid of that character?

Yeah I guess. But it seems pretty clear that even Kit says "i'm not coming back"  doesn't get much more clear than that? And for what, next season "haha troll face, I lied" ? lol.

 

Also, the dude cut his hair, I know wiggs can be used, but imo that was his way of getting rid of that character?

He could have been told to lie.

 

I just find it very hard to believe that they have killed of that character for good, they built him up so much with all that he has done and there was a lot more to do with him in future episodes, without him, the wall, rest of the nights watch just seem pointless with no purpose especially with Sam, Gilly + the baby no longer being there either.

 

Also, surely the red headed woman must have returned to the wall for a reason, who is she going to serve now? I can't imagine her serving the likes of the king, Boltons, Khalesi etc. She certainly saw something in Snow or was at least interested in him for something.

 

Yeah fair shout about the hair but like you said, they could use a wig/hair extensions, he didn't have much cut of either.

  • Like 1

He could have been told to lie.

 

I just find it very hard to believe that they have killed of that character for good, they built him up so much with all that he has done and there was a lot more to do with him in future episodes, without him, the wall, rest of the nights watch just seem pointless with no purpose especially with Sam, Gilly + the baby no longer being there either.

 

Also, surely the red headed woman must have returned to the wall for a reason, who is she going to serve now? I can't imagine her serving the likes of the king, Boltons, Khalesi etc. She certainly saw something in Snow or was at least interested in him for something.

 

Yeah fair shout about the hair but like you said, they could use a wig/hair extensions, he didn't have much cut of either.

Oh I want to believe, specially because none of it makes sense as you point out. Problem is, I don't think show producers would lie? (Is there are history of producers lying?) I mean, it's one thing they would say "We don't know". But saying "he's not coming back" Can't be more thorough than that.

Oh I want to believe, specially because none of it makes sense as you point out. Problem is, I don't think show producers would lie? (Is there are history of producers lying?) I mean, it's one thing they would say "We don't know". But saying "he's not coming back" Can't be more thorough than that.

Frankly there's nothing in the producers statement that actually confirms it to be definite, and kit might legitimately think his character is dead if they haven't told him otherwise yet (similar to how shows may not tell cast members about their deaths until very close to filming those specific episodes).

On the other hand, all men must die, right? :p

99.9% of the characters on this show are just terrible, terrible people that

everyone wants to see die. Every now and again one of them gets it.... but

most of the time it's the people we like that get it. At this rate, the only

survivors are going to be the insane folks, of which there are a TON.

 

I've really enjoyed the show up to this point, but as has been said many

times, we're quickly getting to the point where I'm just not going to care

about the cast, anymore. What do we have left?

 

A Whimpering King.

Incest Royalty.

Torture Porn Royalty.

A pimp.

Liches with an undead army.

Etc.

 

For likeable characters?

A couple of Stark girls who will never be the same again.... and may become unlikable.

 

The only reliable awesome character is the Imp. They kill him, I'm done. OH, and about

Snow... where the HELL was the damn wolf??? I was so looking for him to bite off some

heads.

Oh I want to believe, specially because none of it makes sense as you point out. Problem is, I don't think show producers would lie? (Is there are history of producers lying?) I mean, it's one thing they would say "We don't know". But saying "he's not coming back" Can't be more thorough than that.

Pretty much what spenser said.

 

They can't even say we are not sure yet as even that statement tells use there is a chance that he will come back and spoil the cliffhanger.

 

When do they start filming season 6 or have they already started?

 

 

And yeah, I was kind of hoping for the wolf to show up and wipe them all out :D Only problem is, if Snow really is dead, they will likely kill the wolf.... :(

There is always a chance that they throw the body over the wall as a final insult and he gets reanimated by the white walker "king" and becomes his lieutenant.  That would be pretty bad if they killed him and now have to deal with him and an army at the wall.

  • Like 2

I think he's dead for good. He said the producer told him its permanent.mplus he cut his hair android getting ready for movie roles. As much as I like the show, I think they are getting gimmicky for killing main characters for for the heck of it. Now, for True Detective season 2!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!