NVIDIA Geforce Drivers 196.75 WHQL Revoked by NVidia


Recommended Posts

One of the discussions that arise anytime we bring up a new graphics card from ATI or NVIDIA is about which company has the better drivers. Well, this should help sway the argument a little bit. It would seem StarCraft II Beta players were among the first to notice low frame rates while using the latest drivers from NVIDIA, and further digging has uncovered that the automated fan-controlling part of said firmware was failing to act as intended. The result? Overheated chips, diminished performance, and in some extreme cases, death (of the GPU, we think the users will be okay). The totality of it is that you should avoid the 196.75 iteration like the plague, and NVIDIA has temporarily yanked the update while investigating the reported issues. Shame that the company hasn't got any warnings up on its site to tell those who've installed the update but haven't yet nuked their graphics card to roll back their drivers, but that's what you've got us for, right?

Source: Engadget

Oops.; seems more stable for me, but uninstalling it to be on the safe side.

  • Like 1

Yeah, I was affected by this. Usually my graphics card idles at 37c - 39c idle. When I resumed from standby, the temps were like 50c+, which is insane for idle. I've been temporarily shutting my computer down to prevent any sort of temperature damage.

I agree, this is really bad - Glad I'm running ATi these days.

Thank you, ATI Companion! Apparently ATI doesn't make mistakes like the rest of us so we should all ditch our NVIDIA cards.

In other news, I'm having no issues at all except GPU Observer telling me that my VRAM is at 100% after playing Divinity II: Ego Draconis. Though I suspect it's not reporting correctly and if I reboot it will be back to normal. By the way, it's not a bad game, it just takes awhile to decide it's worth playing.

Thank you, ATI Companion! Apparently ATI doesn't make mistakes like the rest of us so we should all ditch our NVIDIA cards.

Who said that? Oh, you're just butthurt :happy:

:rolleyes:

Like ATI has NEVER released a bad set of drivers.

Again, I never claimed that, did I :rolleyes: People are so on edge around here - I am no hardware fanboy, I purchase whatever I can afford and offers me the best performance in

games I play. So the last time I decided to go with an ATi card, unlike my previous 3 cards which were from nVidia. And had I picked an nVidia could it would have been a GX2 / SLi

combination and that would have hit me hard with poor performance in BC2 and headaches about bad drivers.

So yes, how dare I be happy at this moment that i chose to go with ATi so I didn't have to suffer with these problems :rolleyes:

well its not just nvidia's driver that's getting a bad rep from this, the WHQL certificate is suddenly abit suspect now...?

There's been enough buggy drivers from big-name vendors over the years to show that WHQL is a joke. But destroying cards takes it to another level. I'm always wary about updating nvidia drivers so I dodged this bullet. Gonna sit tight when the next ones come out and see if they're ok. Apparently they did bring noticable speed gains over the earlier 19x drivers.

well its not just nvidia's driver that's getting a bad rep from this, the WHQL certificate is suddenly abit suspect now...?

You raise a good point there... How could a such a major fault pass WHQL certification as well as Nvidia's internal beta testing process?

Either the testing and certification folks aren't doing their jobs OR something else is causing the fan problem...

Figures :p I haven't upgraded my drivers in months since most everything was working fine...but had some odd graphics glitches a few days back, figured might as well update, so I updated on the 3rd with these >.< So far haven't noticed issues like mentioned...but I suppose it's a good time to change to a different version...just in case

I have a dead XFX 9800GT after installing these drivers, it fried (bad smell + loud crack). Evidently I experienced the fan control bug!

I'm really hoping we see some program of replacement or compensation. I don't overclock or mess with anything related to my hardware or its drivers. You couldn't get a more out-of-the-box setup. Card in slot, install drivers, job done. Yet still it fails. Many people on the Nvidia forums are trying to blame us, the users. Very frustrating.

Please put this on the front page - we need some publicity to help ensure we are suitably compensated.

I have a dead XFX 9800GT after installing these drivers, it fried (bad smell + loud crack). Evidently I experienced the fan control bug!

I'm really hoping we see some program of replacement or compensation. I don't overclock or mess with anything related to my hardware or its drivers. You couldn't get a more out-of-the-box setup. Card in slot, install drivers, job done. Yet still it fails. Many people on the Nvidia forums are trying to blame us, the users. Very frustrating.

Please put this on the front page - we need some publicity to help ensure we are suitably compensated.

well if you registered your product with XFX. i think your card is under lifetime warranty with them. send it back to them

Yeah the card is registered and the support ticket is awaiting technician response. I couldn't find any info about the length of the warranty, so I really hope you are right! :)

Edit: actually XFX have responded, and said I just need to take it back to the reseller. Which is a real pain, given it's 14months old and I'm not sure I have the receipt... also what are the chances of the person in the shop actually believing this issue (unless they happen to be on the ball). Not impressed!

http://www.xfxforce.com/en-us/Features/DoubleLifetimeWarranty.aspx

Double Lifetime Protection*

Nothing tops our warranty. It?s not just a limited lifetime warranty, it?s a transferable lifetime warranty. So, should you sell your XFX 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, GTX-, GTS-, GT-, and GeForce Series or any XFX Radeon HD Series cards, whomever you give it to or sell it to is protected, as well. Better still, it?s the best card on the planet for gamers who push our cards to the limit.

What Do I Get?

It?s this simple: We will service and repair any XFX 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, GTX-, GTS-, GT-, and GeForce Series or any XFX Radeon HD Series Graphics Card for the lifetime of that card. All you have to do is register your card with us online within 30 days of purchase. And, if you sell or give the card to someone else, we?ll honor the warranty for the second owner, as long as he/she registers the card with us.

What?s Covered?

All XFX 6-, 7-, 8-, 9-, GTX, GT and GeForce Series and XFX Radeon HD Series registered Graphics Cards. The limited hardware warranty lasts for a period of one year. However, to be covered by the XFX Double Lifetime Limited Warranty, you must register your card within 30 days of purchase.

How Do I Get It?

Simply purchase an applicable XFX Graphics Card and register it within 30 days of purchase. That is all it takes.

*Double Lifetime Protection only available in North America (United States and Canada). Applies to select graphics cards products only. Restrictions and qualifications may vary based on state or region. See XFX Support section for more details on the Limited Warranty for XFX-branded products in North America. Warranty terms for other regions vary.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!