Access IMAP/SMTP behind ISA?


Recommended Posts

192.168.16.4 is the IP Address of the firewall server that holds ISA. (firewall.westview.local). We have a complicated setup.

the firewall has 2 NICs

Internet / 10.83.112.3

LAN / 192.168.16.4

Your assumption was correct i changed the log query to only show activity from ports 587 and 445 and 25 (Destination port?) and get nothing.

So basically this sort of activity has been blocked by the guys who manage our switches. We are a school and our service is provided by the local authority. I just manage the server and firewall at that level, when it gets into the hubs n stuff it's contracted to them so it's likely to be well password protected.

Unfortunately no, but i don't think the issue is ISA Server. I'm not sure but i've given up anyway.

Yes i can access mail from my browser.

If you can access you email account from browser using ISA server then definitely problem should be Outlook Express, MS Outlook, or thunderbird configuration settings...

check the attached screenshots and try configuration again on outlook client...

post-248694-12694998790862.jpg

post-248694-12694998906328.jpg

  • 3 months later...

This reminded me of how much of a Cluster your network is.. As we discussed in your other thread.. Its amazing any protocols are working on this network..

Your double natting, and running different networks on the same physical hardware, etc.

From this thread

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/912640-isa-server-and-osx/

Server -

1 NIC -> SWITCH

IP Address: 192.168.16.2

Subnet Mask: 255.255.252.0

Default Gateway: 10.83.112.1

Preferred DNS: 192.168.16.2

We went over in that thread how much of a cluster that is!! You had both interfaces of the ISA plugged into the same switch, with 2 different addresses on the interfaces, even though plugged into the same hardware.. And you were getting

""Status: A packet was dropped because ISA Server determined that the source IP address is spoofed. ""

In that thread I told you how to fix that issue, and how to correctly wire your network if your going to run 2 private networks, 192.168.x.x and 10.x.x.x

Your problems stem from having one of the must jacked up networks I have ever in my life had someone describe to me.. ;)

  • 3 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!