Hard drive evolution could hit XP


Recommended Posts

^ They don't have to but you see, companies are driven by profit. And if they don't make stuff compatible with the operating system that is used by 50% of the market, they are killing off a lot of customers therefore losing profit. It only makes sense to.

^ They don't have to but you see, companies are driven by profit. And if they don't make stuff compatible with the operating system that is used by 50% of the market, they are killing off a lot of customers therefore losing profit.

I can understand that, and I know its not going to change anytime soon. But it is still those people that are holding back technological advancements.

Take 64bit for example. It provides huge amounts of benefit over 32 bit, performance and security being the major ones. But companies are reluctant to code 64bit apps because of the people who are still on 32bit. So instead of us moving forward and embracing new technologies, we keep having to return to the past. And as a result, we and the rest of the tech world is held back.

hmm maybe im confusing this with a file system, but isnt NTFS already 4096 bytes per sector by default?

from the anandtech article

"NTFS, EXT3, and HFS+ all default to 4KB clusters on modern hard drives. So 4KB physical sectors map perfectly with 4KB file system clusters, which in turn map perfectly with 4KB memory pages. And hence 4KB is the largest practical size for a hard drive sector at this time."

The 64-bit app debate is different. They aren't coding for it because of the 32-bit users.

However, this debate we're having is about a new hard drive being back-compatible. I don't see the issue with this, as it's still new technology for new computers that also work on older ones.

also... the performance problems that comes from 512 byte writes being emulated in a 4k block, couldnt that be solved with clever firmware in the hard disk like what they do on SSD's , as well as modified file defragmentation which takes the 4k blocks into account?

I can understand that, and I know its not going to change anytime soon. But it is still those people that are holding back technological advancements.

Take 64bit for example. It provides huge amounts of benefit over 32 bit, performance and security being the major ones. But companies are reluctant to code 64bit apps because of the people who are still on 32bit. So instead of us moving forward and embracing new technologies, we keep having to return to the past. And as a result, we and the rest of the tech world is held back.

That's why Microsoft will need to only make a 64bit release soon. To force the change.

When the time comes that the cost of making a 32-bit version outweighs the profit it's bringing in, they'll stop making it.

As long as you're viewing "profit" and "cost" as deeper variables than immediate numbers on the balance sheets, yeah. (i.e. why would anyone ever develop anything new if it was solely about current profit and cost?)

Most of the questions being in the thread are already answered in the topic. It won't be that the drives won't work on XP, but they won't work as well. There's only so much you can do with emulation and drivers.

That's why Microsoft will need to only make a 64bit release soon. To force the change.

It's sad but many users have older computers and yet they expect new hardware and new operating systems to work just fine on their old junk. At some point in time it's time to move on to newer stuff.

jumping on the offtopic bandwagon myself...

but isnt microsoft beginning the split of current gen hardware with 'classic' hardware, with their mobile OS strategy? as in windows phone 7 , and windows phone classic...

so if this was brought over to the desktops, all the outdated computers will still run a new OS, but it will be stripped down and pretty miserable compared to the '64 bit' OS that has all the latest features and all that...

Hard drives are in dire need of an update, the technology is as dated sounding as Floppy Disk. :p

Some of the technology used in a hard drive is pretty damned modern. The nobel prize in physics was only just awarded for giant magnetoresistance a couple years ago, which is a relatively cool quantum effect which modern drives use in their heads.

We'd go a lot further with innovation if we would stop hand-holding the decade-impaired people who refuse to adopt change. With PC prices the lowest they've been in ages, there's no excuse anymore. If your business is important enough to depend on computers, then you're doing yourselves--and your customers--a disservice by sticking to obsolete software, because it's dangerous and counterproductive.

Dont see why MS cant/wont release a patch for that tbh :p

Because they want to encourage people to ditch XP and buy a new copy of Windows 7. ;)

XP had its place, but if you are throwing good money into your old PC by buying a hard drive, maybe it is time to also invest in a modern OS (or a free one, if you really *hate* to spend money that much)

Will BSD, FreeDOS, ReactOS and Haiku be ready for this (all four are opensource OS's)?

For now, no.

After reading this article earlier last night, I began to entertain the idea of getting a WD10EARS (I've been wanting to get a backup hard drive for some time now), and came across posts with people stating that parted currently cannot align the partition correctly (there is a workaround posted).

So for now, it appears that only WinNT 6.x can initialize drive correctly and easily.

Windows XP is ancient.

It is going on NINE YEARS OLD. This is in a world where the average life cycle is around 3 years. It may have been able to last 5 or 6 years because of the time Microsoft took on Vista, but that still is no reason to keep using it for 9 years!

* The home version is 32-bit only and can't take advantage of 4 Gigs or more RAM.

It's common to find many systems with well over 8 Gigs RAM now. Valve reports almost a 3rd of its users have 4 Gigs or more of RAM.

* Windows XP does not support partitions larger than 2 TB.

Guess what? 2 TB drives have been out and are very affordable, and many NAS boxes that use RAID have well over 2 TB partitions available. "Not supported by Windows XP" is a sticker that has been made for drives already.

* Windows XP does not support 4K physical clusters and can not take advantage of newer drives without hacks.

* Windows XP is not "SSD aware" and will not take proper advantage of newer drive features and speed enhancements.

* Windows XP does not natively support SATA drives or any of the speed enhancements and features of such drives.

* Windows XP does not support security features like UAC or account elevation; something that has existed in Mac OS X and Linux for many, many years.

* Windows XP does not support 3D acceleration of the Desktop.

* Windows XP is based on some very old technology and is incredibly insecure by default.

* Windows XP is now several versions behind on DirectX, and cannot take advantage of the newest gaming technologies.

* New hardware components like 64-bit, Dual-Core+ processors, 2+ Gig RAM kits, and fast DX10+ video cards are incredibly affordable, more so than ever before.

Get it? XP IS OLD. It is out-dated. It is a relic of an OS that doesn't take advantage of any of the new technologies available.

If it doesn't support "YET ANOTHER" new technology. Who cares? It's like crying that Windows 98SE won't take advantage of it either, or that your VCR can't play a Blu-Ray Disc.

People who run ancient operating systems probably aren't the type that go out and buy new technology anyway. If you can't seem to purchase a new version of Windows, why would you purchase an SSD, 4K drive, DX11 video card, or anything else remotely "modern"?

Don't complain that you can't use some new piece of hardware, XP users seem to be stuck in some sort of time warp and become more of a joke with each passing day.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
    • And with SO much better perf than the laggy mess that is Files.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      598
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      76
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!