Recommended Posts

I'm not afraid of dying too but playing Rambo-style gets boring quickly. You die, wait X seconds, and respawn only to die again. When I play, I usually go all out when planting or defusing an M-COM. In Conquest mode, I take my sweet time and rack up a lot of kills.

I'm not afraid of dying too but playing Rambo-style gets boring quickly. You die, wait X seconds, and respawn only to die again. When I play, I usually go all out when planting or defusing an M-COM. In Conquest mode, I take my sweet time and rack up a lot of kills.
Sure that might happen but with me, I'll take at least 3 baddies down with me, and then I die. And then depending on my team mates (who are either dumb as **** or well organized co-ordinate players take your pick) we we get the objective.
Bring a decent medic then. :p
+1 to this. Nothing like dying, getting rez'd, and dishing out some revenge kills :D

Finally unlocked the m95 the other day, and my god its awesome, normally i suck at snipping on this, but first time i used the m95, racked up 10 kills in a few minutes, i dont know why so many people use the Gol, m95 is so much better i find, pretty much 1 shot kill

There was an awesome suggestion a few pages back about using the tracer gun on teammates who are annoying you. Just shoot them right in the face, and the dart completely obscures their vision. I haven't tried this myself, though. Nobody has made me angry enough to try... yet :).

I was playing Recon and had someone do that to me. But I don't think he realized it was a team killing allowed server. So I just pointed my sniper at him and killed him. You'd think a decision like that (to kill a team mate) would come back to hurt you. But nothing happened.

Finally unlocked the m95 the other day, and my god its awesome, normally i suck at snipping on this, but first time i used the m95, racked up 10 kills in a few minutes, i dont know why so many people use the Gol, m95 is so much better i find, pretty much 1 shot kill

The Gol is way more accurate and faster to aim. I find damage on sniper rifles is moot for the most part because when I'm playing recon with a sniper rifle I'm going for head shots anyways, and that's 1 shot 1 kill.

Finally unlocked the m95 the other day, and my god its awesome, normally i suck at snipping on this, but first time i used the m95, racked up 10 kills in a few minutes, i dont know why so many people use the Gol, m95 is so much better i find, pretty much 1 shot kill
I prefer the accuracy of the GOL, M95 is good, but the GOL is better in my opinion.
I was playing Recon and had someone do that to me. But I don't think he realized it was a team killing allowed server. So I just pointed my sniper at him and killed him. You'd think a decision like that (to kill a team mate) would come back to hurt you. But nothing happened.
So you decided to TK him? Yeah, I wouldn't have stood for that, I would have TKed you back.

The Gol is way more accurate and faster to aim. I find damage on sniper rifles is moot for the most part because when I'm playing recon with a sniper rifle I'm going for head shots anyways, and that's 1 shot 1 kill.

Same. As a recon player I always go for the head shot unless I see someone that has just taken fire, then I hit them anywhere. Because of this the Gol is my choice of weapons.

Hell yes. I am not scared of dying, unlike 98% of players who play this game. I quit shortly after that game, when I found 4 team members just staring at an armed M-COM station, all too scared to disarm it because of dying. I HATE and I really do mean HATE players that are scared to die, and worry about their K/D ratio.

Agreed

So you decided to TK him? Yeah, I wouldn't have stood for that, I would have TKed you back.

He wanted to grief me by blocking my view. Everywhere I looked there was this bright red glow that obstructed my vision. So obviously I killed him for being such a jerk. Had he not done anything to me he wouldn't of had to sit out the game for 10 seconds or however long the respawn was. And he never TK'd me back because I doubt he remembered who did it.

If people want to play Recon, just let them, don't be a jerk about it and try to stick trackers to there faces and things.

Every time I decide to use a shotgun everyone goes really far away from me and pistols/handguns aren't as good as people with machine guns and whatnot....

Throw on the 12 gage mod. Its like sniping. :p

I also should note i play only in hardcore now. So shottys are 1 hit kills.

I play Rush all the time. Played a few SQDM games before and it was really fun.

We should have a Neowin 360 game night one day, but a lot of people here seem to have it on PC...if only they could do that 360->PC connectivity again...That's be great!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This got me thinking, would you rather a self driving car prioritise protecting its passengers or everyone else? I'd choose the one that keeps me and my kids safest. At some point, these cars have to make those choices already, don't they? Wonder if we have a way to find out what way they lean.
    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      565
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!