Recommended Posts

In CQC you have no need to scope. Surely, your aim should be good enough to deal with a few baddies at close range, without scoping?! x4 Scope all the way thumbs_up.gif

Obviously at some point I will have both and try them both, so we will see! cool.gif

The only time I use the 4x Rifle Scope is when I want to pick off people in the distance. For everything else, I use the iron sights or the RDS. It's just a matter of preference, really. :)

I like the 4x just because it makes it easier for me to use the Spotting feature. I know that it doesn't actually give you a tangible advantage when spotting (you need that specialization whose name I can't remember), but for some reason I find myself spotting a lot more when I have the 4x slapped on my gun. Having to fight in close quarters with the scope sucks though (or at least, I suck at it). I usually just end up hip firing and hope for the best.

Maybe I am missing it, but are there no options to save custom classes (similar to MW2)?

As far as I'm aware, there isn't a way to save your loadouts indefinitely. I'm not 100% sure though but I think the last update made it so that your loadout is saved between sessions.

I hate CQC with the 4x Rifle Scope. It feels like I have tunnel vision or something. :s
I have never used scope in CQC. Am I weird like that? Do you guys use x4 Scope when in CQC?
Maybe I am missing it, but are there no options to save custom classes (similar to MW2)?
The game saves your last selection automatically now.

As far as I'm aware, there isn't a way to save your loadouts indefinitely. I'm not 100% sure though but I think the last update made it so that your loadout is saved between sessions.

I do see my load it saved between sessions. I just wish I could setup for example, my F2000, with a certain sight, LW, and then something for the vehicle. Then, have my M16 setup with a different sight, extra ammo, and something else for vehicle. Than I could access those everytime I started the game up.

No biggie to be honest, just would be easier. Thanks again Anaron.

As you can see, I am starting to play the game more than I had in the past. I got burned out on MW2 finally.

I am talking about on the 360, and when you turn the system off when done playing, then back on and it would save your custom load outs for every weapon you have created.

Yeah I think it only remembers for a session, meaning once you turn the console on and off it will reset to default, but could be wrong there as I do not play it a whole lot.

Sethos.png

Randomly posting stats, for the heck of it - Can't believe I actually got past 20 despite only playing for a 'short' time after launch and now haven't played for months.

A Month :p Game hasnt been out for Months(2 or more) :p.

Just picking on you man, but great stats. Ive put 50 or so hours and just hit 23 and half way to 24. Ill always play 1-2 hours a day. But with SC its like an hour BC2 and then 2-4 hours of SC

What's the online scene like for BC2? Has it dived as quickly as BC1 did? Just wondering as i'm thinking about picking this up soon :)

And depending on what system you want it for you can get it fairly cheap as well. I think there's a post in the PC games sales thread that says you can get it for like $17 or something.

The post in question: http://www.neowin.ne...#entry592551350

i got a problem!. when i am trying to find a server it finds nothing!. even my history display nothing!. i read somewhere it causes by a firewall problem even i dont use any firewall. i even disable the windows7 standard firewall!. how can i fix this problem?

@w33zy: Not having any firewall is very silly, especially if you're using the Internet, not just games. Gawd knows what viruses you may have.

Anyway, do you connect to the Internet via a router with a firewall?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      579
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!