Recommended Posts

<Snipped>

Have you realized they fixed pings for non admins? I mean I read it, but I couldnt believe the "alternate method"(a proper one at that i believe) works the same for administrators and non.

I wish Xfire Overlay and/or Steam Overlay worked. It worked with BETA, but then went down hill. Xfire overlay never worked, told me to run xfire as admin, i do, and still no overlay in BC2.

Anaron, also has to alt tab, as do i to talk through steam, so does anyone have this issue?

I believe its common, and i hope they figure it out, hell atleast you dont get kicked for fraps running via Punkbuster for "disallowed program/driver"(cod4 pb, still no change to this).

But other then that, I can finally kill with the M95, games havent lagged for me at all, but pings do help a lot now.

But once SC2 beta starts, no more BC2 lol. But its fixed now, so I can play it instead of taking 2 months off like i already did. Still @ lvl 24 with everything completed but tanks(hate tank whoring).

Edited by Anaron

Map Pack 4 has been leaked.

Atacama Desert Rush

vip4-ad.jpg

Port Valdez Conquest

vip4-pv.jpg

White Pass Rush

vip4-wp.jpg

Nelson Bay Conquest

vip4-nb.jpg

The map list provided by MadMuthaMonk (link):

Battlefield Bad Company 2\Package\levels\

Conquest

----------------

Nelson Bay - mp_008cq

Port Valdez - mp_012cq

Rush

----------------

White Pass - mp_007gr

Atacama Desert - mp_005gr

Squadrush

----------------

Laguna Presa - mp_009sr

Laguna Alta - mp_003sr

Squad Deathmatch

----------------

Nelson Bay - mp_008sdm

Panama Canal - mp_001sdm

Links to photos:

http://www.gamer.ru/games/814-battlefield-bad-company-2/posts/46239

http://img706.imageshack.us/gal.php?g=bfbc2gametotalbfru1.jpg

http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/battlefield-bad-company-2-ng/1207395-map-pack-4-info-2.html#post16396982

thanks dice... would it kill you to make another map?

thanks for the info though SCRISP (Y)

Totally agree, I would love some different maps that have not yet been seen. I just hope they bring some NEW maps out before Vietnam.

Although i'm looking forward to Port Valdez Conquest, it's got two attack helicopters.

Haha, "Map packs" my ass.

come on seth, you should know this is a map pack to Dice/EA by now... at least they arne't charging for them (if they were i would go all brown on them and fly a plane into dice's headquarters...)

Totally agree, I would love some different maps that have not yet been seen. I just hope they bring some NEW maps out before Vietnam.

Although i'm looking forward to Port Valdez Conquest, it's got two attack helicopters.

honeslty more then anything, i wish in hardcore mode at least, they would take out the tank in squad deathmatch, or at least give the server the option of removing it...

stupid nubs hoping in the tank

White Pass is probably the best map ever. Be interesting to see how Rush plays out on it.

Personally I think this will turn out into a disaster. People are going to be sat on the roof of the create building sniping the attacks as soon as they spawn. This map will turn into an easy spawn raping match for the defenders on the first base.

Good find trag.

I do have to admit, playing all the BF games this one is a "let down" with the random bad patches and then really good ones and then bad.

I mean, if anyone played BF2 at launch, it was PLAGUED with problems, but finally they smoothed it out and thousands of people sitll ply that game.

Hell i go back to it more because I love flying jets, or just rushing in Strike at Karkand(favorite map of all time).

Wish DICE wouldnt listen to demize, leave him to the consoles and get someone sensible or PC. Hopefully BF3 is STRICT PC, so we can get full BF2 + BC2 + new idea awesomeness in the mix.

It seems odd that they're not forcing all servers to be R16 though.

Anyways, I wouldn't get any hopes up for BF3 being an exclusive pc game. There is simply to much money to be had by releasing it on the consoles. I could see maybe nVidia or ATI trying to get them to release it exclusively on the pc to sell hardware but I really doubt that will happen. Especially if EA gets their say in the matter.

Anyways, I wouldn't get any hopes up for BF3 being an exclusive pc game. There is simply to much money to be had by releasing it on the consoles. I could see maybe nVidia or ATI trying to get them to release it exclusively on the pc to sell hardware but I really doubt that will happen. Especially if EA gets their say in the matter.

Exactly that. Consoles are too important to be left in the cold when developing such AAA titles as the Battlefield series. It's dumb to assume that EA would consider making BF3 only on PC as the income wouldn't be high enough. Unless they introduce some sort of subscription, ie, WoW, but that would be retarded.

Demize99 I don't make balance changes based on the popular opinion in forums. That way lies madness.

@oskarki Underused but over effective. There's two other AT weapons if you don't like it. Variety is it's own spice.

I'm wondering what he bases his balance changes on? Whims? This guy needs to be fired asap. And that ladies and gentlemen is the man who is in charge of balancing this game. I guess it explains why he nerfed the AT4 into uselessness though. Because no one ever complained about it on the forums.

I'm wondering what he bases his balance changes on? Whims? This guy needs to be fired asap. And that ladies and gentlemen is the man who is in charge of balancing this game. I guess it explains why he nerfed the AT4 into uselessness though. Because no one ever complained about it on the forums.

The mans an idiot and I hope he wasnt with them for BF2 because I like the balancing in that game. In this game, he is the reason of the downfall.

He needs to get his ass kicked out of there fast.

Also, its not STUPID to think BF3 will be PC only seeing how majority of BF games were PC and the first BC originally came out on Console by EA so when DICE jumped in or was brought in for BC2, they brought it into the PC world.

I really hope if anything, BF3 stricks truly to PC and console players are left with a ****ty port and not the other way around.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!