Recommended Posts

How can you view your stats? I haven't been able to see that stats page since all that was merged into one site 2-3 weeks ago. I can only look at my veteran info.

This is EA's stats page? Or for Veteran's that own all the previous BF games?

The link you posted does not take me anywhere except the EA Bad Company page.... hence my question about veteran

Simple answer: that sounds stupid. And it's actually called Destruction 2.0 in the game.

I'm not sure if you're trying to be sarcastic or what..?

im not trying to be sarcastic, Destruction 2.0 is the physics engine in the game, so technically any kills that you get with it are attributed to the physics

just because its a generic term doesnt mean it has to sound stupid... ?what if that "Destruction 2.0" name catches on and people start using it to describe any similar kills in future games, even if the physics engine was a completely different one...

This is EA's stats page? Or for Veteran's that own all the previous BF games?

The link you posted does not take me anywhere except the EA Bad Company page.... hence my question about veteran

The EA's bad company page is now the veteran page.... if you would of logged in you would of been able to see what I mean. Heres a pic for proof.

2s63j43.jpg

Now do you see what I mean?

The single player is not only very hard, but it is very frustrating and crap. It seems EA built up a single player game around a multiplayer game. There isn't much to the single player, go here, shot that, go here, shot some more, you're done.

The single player is not only very hard, but it is very frustrating and crap. It seems EA built up a single player game around a multiplayer game. There isn't much to the single player, go here, shot that, go here, shot some more, you're done.

Thats pretty much it. DICE is Perfect at multiplayer. Thats where they shine, the multiplayer was just there for ****s and giggles. First multiplayer ive played for any game especially an FPS for a long time and I enjoyed it. Funny/witty comments, fun gameplay, etc. Either way I jumped online first like always.

But, the new MoH seems promising. If IW does the story and DICE does the multiplayer like planned, it will be a epic game.

the original site was pulled because they put http://www.badcompany2.ea.com/veteran up.

You can view your stats right away. They are updated every second pretty much. Also veteran management is now easier and better integrated. The original site will be back for other games like it use to be or each games offical ea page(game.ea.com) will have the veteran system incoporated.

But yeah that's the website, easier to manage.

@rajput: yeah I'm getting the good ping / bad lag issue. But what I noticed was the server browser starts showing you servers closer to you so basically every Chicago server I'm a regular. Works great. Waiting for r9 servers to fix other servers.

Thanks

The single player is not only very hard, but it is very frustrating and crap. It seems EA built up a single player game around a multiplayer game. There isn't much to the single player, go here, shot that, go here, shot some more, you're done.

It'd be a bit silly to buy this game for the SP experience, imo.

It's passable but only about 20% of the game.....

The single player is not only very hard, but it is very frustrating and crap. It seems EA built up a single player game around a multiplayer game. There isn't much to the single player, go here, shot that, go here, shot some more, you're done.

Apparently you've never played BF before :laugh:

Btw, DICE are the developers, not EA. It's also why DICE have been roped into MoH later this year to handle MP. That series fell flat on it's face with MP previously.

@Sikh, IW have nothing to do with the MoH reboot? It's EA/DICE.

Apparently you've never played BF before :laugh:

Btw, DICE are the developers, not EA. It's also why DICE have been roped into MoH later this year to handle MP. That series fell flat on it's face with MP previously.

@Sikh, IW have nothing to do with the MoH reboot? It's EA/DICE.

I have faith IW will come back for it. MoH is there first title or was.

Come back for it? Dude, you're off in a day dream. The game is releasing this fall. They aren't allowed to develop a game for anyone else but Activision. Did you miss the whole debacle 2 weeks ago?

They are still mid-contract with them until the end of the year iirc.

Come back for it? Dude, you're off in a day dream. The game is releasing this fall. They aren't allowed to develop a game for anyone else but Activision. Did you miss the whole debacle 2 weeks ago?

They are still mid-contract with them until the end of the year iirc.

Oh I know, but I also realize as soon as activision fired them that the contract should be broken, and the fact that IW is in a lawsuit to get there own "name" back as well as the rights for call of duty and the loyalties for MW2, im pretty sure they could "come back" and help develop MoH.

Is it plausible? No lol. But I want it to happen god damnit. IW needs to make games without activision.

Once the dust settles on the whole issue I think they'll probably start their own studio again & everyone will be throwing money at them.

Going to EA is the easy option, but after the way Activision treated them, I sincerely doubt they'll ever trust another publisher again to own their IP.I know I wouldn't.

Once the dust settles on the whole issue I think they'll probably start their own studio again & everyone will be throwing money at them.

Going to EA is the easy option, but after the way Activision treated them, I sincerely doubt they'll ever trust another publisher again to own their IP.I know I wouldn't.

that's even if they get their IP back...

It'd be a bit silly to buy this game for the SP experience, imo.

It's passable but only about 20% of the game.....

It's too bad they didn't spend more time on the SP then. They surely haven't given us a $60 game. Maybe they should have just sold the multiplayer portion of the game on XBLA/PSN for $15 or $20, like Battlefield 1943.

Anyone else getting random servers with low pings but you are lagging like a mofo for some reason? Random servers for me (that are usually perfect) are having random jumps in ping/latency (whatever DICE is calling it now) and makes the game unplayable.
Yes me! Either I am rubber banding like a bitch or my enemy is. Even happened on my regular server last night. Honestly some of the worst netcode I have ever seen!
Meh, that is just for the awards, not actually gameplay stuff.

Anyone can awards ######...

bfbc2game20100403181730.th.jpg

(click to make bigger)

I am not particular proud of the above, because of the reason I stated eariler. But the one below I am :D...

bfbc2game20100326021122.th.jpg

Meh, that is just for the awards, not actually gameplay stuff.

Anyone can awards ######...

bfbc2game20100403181730.th.jpg

(click to make bigger)

I am not particular proud of the above, because of the reason I stated eariler. But the one below I am :D...

bfbc2game20100326021122.th.jpg

Yea, that's true, but don't take this moment away from me. :(

I had a good round prior to the round above where I actually had a good combat score. I didn't take a screenshot of it though.

I mainly play Squad Deathmatch so there isn't too much time to accumulate a high combat score.

Yea, that's true, but don't take this moment away from me. :(

I had a good round prior to the round above where I actually had a good combat score. I didn't take a screenshot of it though.

I mainly play Squad Deathmatch so there isn't too much time to accumulate a high combat score.

Oops, sorry didn't mean to do that :blush:

Just a little bit of info for the neowin players. If you shoot a tracer at a tank helicopters like the apache and the russian version's missiles will home in on the tracer. Hope this helps everyone. :laugh:

I haven't tried it to see if you have to target the tank for a certain amount of time like rpg's though. But I think it's still useful information.

Edit: Also the alt fire perk gives the attack heli's extra missiles for the gunner. And the smoke perk will clear a tracer from a vehicle and break missile locks. But that goes for any vehicle that has a tracer or missile lock on it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      575
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!