[Rumor] Sony to drop exclusive bombshell announcement


Recommended Posts

Exclusives are so lame - I don't understand why big names even bother.

In the other thread, FFXIII for 360 has 40% of the vote now surely those sale numbers would far outweigh anything Sony or Microsoft could offer a developer. :angry: I'm certainly not going to buy the other console just because of one game, no matter how good it may be (I still haven't played MGS4, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, Little Big Planet...)

Exclusives are so lame - I don't understand why big names even bother.

In the other thread, FFXIII for 360 has 40% of the vote now surely those sale numbers would far outweigh anything Sony or Microsoft could offer a developer. :angry: I'm certainly not going to buy the other console just because of one game, no matter how good it may be (I still haven't played MGS4, God of War 3, Uncharted 2, Little Big Planet...)

I'm sorry but the God of War series and the Uncharted series alone are worth having a PS3.

I'm sorry but the God of War series and the Uncharted series alone are worth having a PS3.

I know they're bloody phenomenal games, which is all the more reason why it doesn't make sense for them to be exclusives since they'd bring it way more money if they were on multiple platforms. I already have a Wii collecting dust between titles so I don't need another console. =\

*mouth waters*

Its not even funny to jokingly get our hopes up!

birthday & veteran tag.

*bow* well done, sir.

I know they're bloody phenomenal games, which is all the more reason why it doesn't make sense for them to be exclusives since they'd bring it way more money if they were on multiple platforms. I already have a Wii collecting dust between titles so I don't need another console. =\

The studios are outright owned by Sony, which is why they're exclusive. And the fact that they're exclusive is about 60% of the reason they are such phenomenal games (same goes for 360 exclusives as well) -- most (not all) multiplatform releases are held back by having to factor in each hardware's weakest link. And a smaller dev with a new IP, like Media Molecule, was helped by not having to expand their resources for a multiplatform release.

TimeSplitters :D

/dreams alone

Free Radical (now called Crytek UK) have already announced & confirmed TimeSplitters 4 last year. It's on hold for now until they think the market is ready for it. Or some BS like that...

Personally I don't rate them as a very good studio anyway. I mean Haze...c'mon :no: TimeSplitters wasn't much better either. Probably going to get lynched for that last comment, but it's success was only brought around cause it was the only FPS to make do with :p

Personally I don't rate them as a very good studio anyway. I mean Haze...c'mon :no: TimeSplitters wasn't much better either. Probably going to get lynched for that last comment, but it's success was only brought around cause it was the only FPS to make do with :p

100% agree. Lets get lynched together :laugh:

GRAND TURISMO 5 !!!!!

:laugh:

Half Life 2: Episode 3

Portal 2

PS3 exclusives.

That would be a bombshell and would raise alot of PS3 console sales.

mmm impossible not to see them on PC, and Valve never hide their PS3 hate, so no (N)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Valve finally confirms Steam Machine prices, starts at $1049 for 512GB option by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The $1,428 option The Steam Hardware lineup that Valve announced last year is slowly starting to roll out. Following the recent Steam Controller launch, Valve has now confirmed the price of the Steam Machine, its all-in-one console-like solution for PC gaming in the living room. There are currently four variants being presented, with only the storage and the included controller being the biggest differences. All of the Steam Machines have the same internals consisting of a semi-custom AMD Zen 4 CPU with six cores and 12 threads, an RDNA 3 28CU GPU, 16GB of DDR5 memory, and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM, all inside the familiar box Valve has been showing off for months now. The Steam Machine base model starts at $1,049. This has a 512GB NVMe SSD but does not come with a Steam Controller. Keep in mind that storage can be expanded with the microSD card slot too. Next, the $1,128 model has the exact same storage as the previous one but it does come with the new Steam Controller. If you need the Steam Machine to have more storage for games and apps than that, then the 2TB tiers are also available. The $1,349 Steam Machine has no controller once again, but it does ship with two extra faceplates (red fabric and solid walnut) to replace the standard black one. The final option costs $1,428, and it adds the controller back into the bundle. The Steam Machine ships with the Linux-based SteamOS. The box has a 1 Gigabit Ethernet port, DisplayPort 1.4, and HDMI 2.0, as well as one USB-C and four USB-A ports. Keep in mind that when purchasing standalone, the Steam Controller has a $100 price tag. With the above bundles, that drops to $80. It's a rather expensive machine for the internals it is touting, though the design and small form factor do help it somewhat. However, at the same time, the lack of upgradability hurts it. Valve says the ongoing parts shortages and massive price hikes for memory were the leading causes for this price. "The overall effect is that our original goal for the price of Steam Machine is no longer viable," added the company. "So the prices we're sharing today reflect the state of the world for manufacturing; or, more accurately, it reflects the price of the components as we've secured them over the past 6 months." Valve wants interested gamers to reserve it now to get the chance to pre-order a Steam Machine starting June 25, with shipping starting on June 29. Head here to sign up. The invites to buy it will be sent in a randomized order.
    • What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, Natural gas plants use about 2,803 gallons of water per megawatt-hour produced, which is significantly less than coal-fired plants that use around 19,185 gallons per megawatt-hour. Overall, natural gas plants are more water-efficient, using 584% less water than traditional power plants on average. AI generated
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      203
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      neufuse
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!