Avatar was my plan to stop piracy


Recommended Posts

Say what now? :p

Don't get me wrong, I strongly believe that if you like a movie or (music)artist you should buy their products. But if someone wants to see if for free, they will always wait extra. And internet is getting faster and faster these days, so 45 minutes extra isn't that big of a deal. Unless this is some lame 1st april joke...

Avatar was highly pirated regardless of its quality.

I mean I even saw some sites list 1080 CAM's of this movie. Yes CAM shot on high def cameras in the cinema and transcoded to 1080 instead of whatever lower rubbish they do.

I think whatever happens pirates will keep compensating. Larger and Larger hard disks are becoming cheaper and cheaper. Internet speeds are always going up and not down. Even I can receive 50Mb internet in my home from a normal ISP at below ?30 a month.

Basically making the movies large in file size won't stop piracy. It'll just give all consumers a better product to buy (or steal).

Personally, I think they'd "lose" less to piracy if they released to DVD etc quicker than they currently do. I can't STAND going to the cinema to see a movie. Uncomfortable, too damned loud, massively overpriced, can't pause it for a pee, and you're surround by noisy <bleep>holes who won't shut the hell up.

If AVATAR has fight piracy it is because the 3D tech that made people want to experience it and because the tech is not mainstream yet, they had to go to cinemas instead of downloading it in crappy quality and of course not 3d.

Someone should actually tell him that the next time he tries to impress the audience and stating that making long duration movies is a way against piracy would certainly made people with >= average minds laugh (laugh really hard).

I believe Avatar did so well because it was original, well done, pretty cool, and wasn't the same chewed up, digested and crapped out stuff Hollywood normally outputs.

No, it was not original at all. The visuals were original but everything else is similar to Dance with the Wolves, Pocahontas and Atlantis.

No, it was not original at all. The visuals were original but everything else is similar to Dance with the Wolves, Pocahontas and Atlantis.

Okay, to be honest, you can basically base every movie off of another movie(s).

Okay, to be honest, you can basically base every movie off of another movie(s).

Watch Atlantis. It's a great animated movie. Almost every character of Avatar is in that movie. From the elders to the precious fuel source the military wants to sell/mine and curious scientists/archeologists, I couldn't help but think Cameron took Avatar from Atlantis.

I enjoyed Avatar.....! Granted, the storyline was somewhat familiar as mentioned by many who write and read this post.... But i reckon that all producers of film and music can take a page from Mr Trent Reznors book (NIN).

Like he said, sure, you cant stop piracy... but, what if you release a product that makes people WANT to own it? Take for example, his album the Hand That Feeds, black disc that turns cream coloured after it heats up in your player.... PDF files that you follow as the music goes on that synchronize visually with each song through the album... or when he leaves mp3's on usb sticks hidden around venues...! or releases albums for free... just to entice you even more!!!!

If they release products that have a funky idea / design ... or just something more special to make you want to own it for the coolness of it, not just another plastic sleeve, with a piece of paper advertising other movies or crap.... and boring prints on the disc... sometimes not even decent prints...!

?True 3D experience?. The "Reality" we all live in is already in 3D. ?Why do I need a 60" TV if I have to watch it from a certain distance to see it all?. ?Why go to a cinema knowing that my CRT TV has better resolution and the sound doesn't have to be loud to hear it?. Ah, the greedy manipulated humanity. Gotta love it. (:

?True 3D experience?. The "Reality" we all live in is already in 3D. ?Why do I need a 60" TV if I have to watch it from a certain distance to see it all?. ?Why go to a cinema knowing that my CRT TV has better resolution and the sound doesn't have to be loud to hear it?. Ah, the greedy manipulated humanity. Gotta love it. (:

IMAX =/= Regular cheap movie experience.

I believe Avatar did so well because it was original, well done, pretty cool, and wasn't the same chewed up, digested and crapped out stuff Hollywood normally outputs.

I feel the exact opposite. To me it's the epitome of what Hollywood 'chewed up, digested and crapped out' stands for. It did well due to the hype and because people are superficial.

Personally, I think they'd "lose" less to piracy if they released to DVD etc quicker than they currently do. I can't STAND going to the cinema to see a movie. Uncomfortable, too damned loud, massively overpriced, can't pause it for a pee, and you're surround by noisy <bleep>holes who won't shut the hell up.

Aye, There's only a few films I can be bothered to go to the Cinema to see and pay the insane prices for. Our local cinema is terrible quality, often half the screen will be unfocused, you'll hear sound from the screen nextdoor etc. At home I get my perfect TV setup, decent sound, breaks whenever I want, cheap popcorn(and beer!)

As much as Cinema's will complain (see the abuse they gave Disney over Alice in Wonderland release dates) I would love day and date release for home use. Whist it wouldn't kill piracy stone dead it would go along way towards it.

No, it was not original at all. The visuals were original but everything else is similar to Dance with the Wolves, Pocahontas and Atlantis.

ditto!

I mean, sorry but there's absolutely nothing original about this film. This story is a regurgitated version of Pocahontas at best.

mediahttp9gagcomphotdab.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!