90 percent of Windows 7 flaws fixed by removing admin rights


Recommended Posts

there is a psychological difference between typing a password or clicking a button.

My thought process

Which means you don't need to change anything unless you just want that extra step for typing in credentials.

I do want that step. She is the type of person to need to look them up each time. This creates a barrier that will ultimately defend her.

Works like that even if she is an admin. :p Which means you don't need to change anything unless you just want that extra step for typing in credentials.

You could also make a case that malware could emulate the look of this window and get her admin credentials (albeit probably without the driver disabling/screen dimming). Either way, giving something administrative privileges really doesn't mean anything. Any range of malware can run and do harm without them.

sure, i'm not refuting that :). The user will always be the weakest link.

I do want that step. She is the type of person to need to look them up each time. This creates a barrier that will ultimately defend her.

It's also somewhat of a false sense of security. The reason is that (as Elliott says) malware can in fact clone the credential dialog, complete with simulated dimming and all. If you enter your credentials into the malware's dialog, it now owns the system. The regular UAC dialog, on the other hand, can't be cloned because simply having you push a button is of little value to the malware.

The biggest issue, though, is that this ignores the fact that everything of interest on the machine is available without admin access. There are also other issues with UAC, such as the fact that there is a window of opportunity between the time your download of an executable finishes and the time you run it. In this time, malware running as standard user can modify the executable (provided it isn't signed, of course) or add a DLL that will automatically load when it's executed. The result is that the malware will ride the elevation of what you think is legitimate software.

Now, most malware won't work without admin rights, and doesn't do clever things like what I've described, so in that sense it does offer a safer experience. The point I'm really making though, is that we wouldn't really be much safer in a world where people didn't blindly run things as admin.

So how much money did they get paid to come up with that foolish report..... How about you don't turn on your machine then 100% of the security holes are fixed.... Can I have ?500 for that please.

What a bizarre complaint. Do you actually have an issue with their report, or are you just looking for things to whine about?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • IBM reveals sub-1nm chip technology, production expected in another 5 years by Pradeep Viswanathan TSMC is now leading the chip manufacturing industry with its 2nm-class process node called N2. Samsung Foundry also has a 2nm-class process node called SF2. TSMC says N2 entered volume production in Q4 2025. Samsung says SF2 started mass production in 2025. Today, IBM announced the world’s first sub-1-nanometer chip technology, marking another major semiconductor research milestone. The new technology is based on a 0.7nm, or 7-angstrom, node and uses a new transistor architecture called “nanostack.” The new design vertically stacks and staggers nanosheet-based transistors so that more components can fit into the same chip area while also improving performance and power efficiency. IBM claims that this new sub-1nm chip can pack nearly 100 billion transistors onto a chip the size of a fingernail. This offers almost twice the density, up to 50 percent higher performance, or 70 percent better energy efficiency when compared to IBM's 2nm node design announced back in 2021. Also, IBM mentioned that this new architecture can deliver 40 percent SRAM scaling. It is important to consider that this announcement from IBM is a research milestone rather than a near-term process node launch. Back in 2021, IBM unveiled the world’s first 2nm chip design, claiming 50 billion transistors on a fingernail-sized chip and major performance and efficiency gains. Five years later, IBM’s 2nm technology has still not entered mainstream commercial production. That is because IBM is no longer a major commercial chip manufacturer. It sold its chip manufacturing business to GlobalFoundries years ago and has since then focused only on semiconductor research, IP development, and partnerships. To productize its 2-nm chip technology, IBM partnered with Japan’s Rapidus, but it has not resulted in anything shipping at scale. IBM says that its new sub-1nm technology can reach production as early as within the next five years. If that happens, it will likely depend on manufacturing partners, advanced EUV tooling, and years of yield improvements.
    • It's funny when thieves accuse other thieves of stealing. Ai companies just blatantly siphoned all the knowledge of the internet without consent and are now selling it with their service... so excuse me if I find this a bit ironic.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!