Recommended Posts

Haven't found any yet. making the browser completely useless.

Are we talking about the arrows that appear when tabs overflow the tabbar? If so, what exactly is the problem with it? (just curious).

In any case, you can hide the tab scroll arrows with this:

.tabbrowser-arrowscrollbox > .scrollbutton-up,
.tabbrowser-arrowscrollbox > .scrollbutton-down {
  display: none !important;
}

Are we talking about the arrows that appear when tabs overflow the tabbar? If so, what exactly is the problem with it? (just curious).

In any case, you can hide the tab scroll arrows with this:

.tabbrowser-arrowscrollbox > .scrollbutton-up,
.tabbrowser-arrowscrollbox > .scrollbutton-down {
  display: none !important;
}

The problem isn`t the scroll arrows, but the fact that we have to scroll to see all opened tabs.

I usually open a lot, and I prefer seeing all little ones instead scrolling them (favicons are enough for me to recognize tabs, doesnt need scroll arrows)

The problem isn`t the scroll arrows, but the fact that we have to scroll to see all opened tabs.

I usually open a lot, and I prefer seeing all little ones instead scrolling them (favicons are enough for me to recognize tabs, doesnt need scroll arrows)

I can recognize tabs by favicon too. Except when there's multiple tabs of a single site...

You want to change the minwidth of a tab to something like 10 pixels so the tabs resize instead of the arrows appearing...

I thought there was a userchrome.css edit for that....

.tabbrowser-tab[fadein]:not([pinned]) {
  min-width: 18px !important;
}

put that in your userchrome.css or stylish script and restart.

You want to change the minwidth of a tab to something like 10 pixels so the tabs resize instead of the arrows appearing...

I thought there was a userchrome.css edit for that....

.tabbrowser-tab[fadein]:not([pinned]) {
  min-width: 18px !important;
}

put that in your userchrome.css or stylish script and restart.

My faith in Firefox has been restored.

Thank you, my friend!

Except it hasn't so he's just trolling.

Opera 10.60 was released with a flash bug that caused various crashes & lockups as well as streaming audio to continue playing after the browser window was closed until the user terminated it in task manager. **FACT** Stating a fact according to the Opera Devs & 100's of users on Opera forums as well as my own experience.

KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, BROWSERS DO GET RELEASED WITH FLASH BASED BUGS LIKE THE ONE IN THE CURRENT FIREFOX NIGHTLY. Mozilla users expect more and they get it. Spoiled Gecko Users Unite.

Wall of words, wall of KNOWLEDGE!

Has the flash bug been fixed? I haven't updated my nightly build for the past few days.

No it hasn't. I just updated to todays built to see.

I would have thought this would be at the top of their lists to fix, but three nightlies since it was introduced and it is still a problem. :/

No it hasn't. I just updated to todays built to see.

I would have thought this would be at the top of their lists to fix, but three nightlies since it was introduced and it is still a problem. :/

it almost seems to be getting a little worse ...

^^ official build. forgot to mention it.

anyway... I don't even want to have the hassle of installing these. i like exe's or just updating browser then restarting.

seriously, they just said last week that monday (today) would be the unveiling of beta 4. can't wait!

Could somebody please help me with a stylish script?

It makes the statusbar transparent, but sometimes it doesn't extend to the findbar.

#browser-bottombox, statusbarpanel, #status-bar, #downbarHolder, .findbar-container
{ -moz-appearance: none !important;
  border: transparent !important;
  border-bottom: 0px !important;
  background: transparent !important;
  text-shadow: 0 0 1em white, 0 0 1ex white; }
.findbar-textbox.findbar-find-fast:not(:hover)
{ opacity:0.7!important; }[attachment=272404:Untitled-2.png]

I'd like to have it like in the upper picture all time :)

post-344784-12825900650103.png

Yess!! So now not I'm the only one who dislikes the quality of directrite :p

I made a new pic which is even more noticable. (GDI is the non directwrite rendering)

post-344784-12825892736292.png

You're definitely not the only one. It's way too blurry for me.

---------------------------------------------------------

And again about the combined stop-reload-go, was that already supposed to be here?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!