Recommended Posts

Could somebody please help me with a stylish script?

It makes the statusbar transparent, but sometimes it doesn't extend to the findbar.

#browser-bottombox, statusbarpanel, #status-bar, #downbarHolder, .findbar-container
{ -moz-appearance: none !important;
  border: transparent !important;
  border-bottom: 0px !important;
  background: transparent !important;
  text-shadow: 0 0 1em white, 0 0 1ex white; }
.findbar-textbox.findbar-find-fast:not(:hover)
{ opacity:0.7!important; }[attachment=272404:Untitled-2.png]

I'd like to have it like in the upper picture all time :)

Same here but failed to do so. It would not work. I'm not good at css at all but this is the closet I got..myself.

/* Change the find bar color (100% transparent does not work) */

findbar {
background-color: rgba(223,233,245,.99) !important;
border-top: 1px solid #686868;
border-bottom: none;
min-width: 1px;
}

Yess!! So now not I'm the only one who dislikes the quality of directrite :p

I made a new pic which is even more noticable. (GDI is the non directwrite rendering)

post-344784-12825892736292.png

It's known to have bugs like that. So don't go all overboard until it is done. The feature isn't even enabled per default in the upcoming official beta.

Known Issues:

- Some fonts do not render properly depending on a number of factors including Video Card and drivers.

Same here but failed to do so. It would not work. I'm not good at css at all but this is the closet I got..myself.

/* Change the find bar color (100% transparent does not work) */

findbar {
background-color: rgba(223,233,245,.99) !important;
border-top: 1px solid #686868;
border-bottom: none;
min-width: 1px;
}

This is my code, seems to work for me.

#browser-bottombox, #status-bar, #status-bar > *, #nav-bar, #PersonalToolbar, #ybToolbar, #find-bar {

 background: transparent !important;
  color: #ffffff !important;
  text-shadow: #000000 1px 1px 2px, #000000 -1px 1px 2px, #000000 1px -1px 2px, #000000 -1px -1px 2px !important;
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
border: #000000 !important;
 font-weight: bold !important;

post-346088-12826419944961.png

Any idea when FF4 Beta 4 will be released?

It was supposed to be out yesterday, but they seem to be having some issues with the Beta 4 candidate builds.

Firefox 4 Beta 4 blockers *shrug*

My guess would be late this week, or early next week.

Edit: LOL, just within 5 minutes, one of those bugs there were resolved as fixed. :D (only 2 listed bugs right now)

Yess!! So now not I'm the only one who dislikes the quality of directrite :p

I made a new pic which is even more noticable. (GDI is the non directwrite rendering)

post-344784-12825892736292.png

The difference in that picture is due to the fact that the DirectWrite rendering is using grey scale anti-aliasing, due to a D2D issue/bug, GDI doesn't have the issue since it's pretty "dumb".

When DirectWrite is told to draw sub-pixel AA text on a transparent surface, it actually makes a copy of the surface (the sub-pixel component colours depend on what's behind them), draws the text over it, then copies it back over only where the pixels were touched. Which leads to a small problem in that the background contents are actually drawn twice (so they're coloured differently). There are ways to avoid it, but they're slower (and would need to be implemented by MS)

please can the topic title mods.

Sun Spider results are slower than beta 3 for me, 810ms vs 826mb :(

RESULTS (means and 95% confidence intervals)
--------------------------------------------
Total:                  [b]826.8ms[/b] +/- 2.0%
--------------------------------------------

  3d:                   138.4ms +/- 8.2%
    cube:                43.2ms +/- 9.4%
    morph:               38.4ms +/- 11.4%
    raytrace:            56.8ms +/- 12.9%

  access:               139.8ms +/- 10.7%
    binary-trees:        38.2ms +/- 12.0%
    fannkuch:            62.6ms +/- 8.7%
    nbody:               16.6ms +/- 34.2%
    nsieve:              22.4ms +/- 11.5%

  bitops:                48.8ms +/- 30.9%
    3bit-bits-in-byte:    1.8ms +/- 30.9%
    bits-in-byte:        19.8ms +/- 30.9%
    bitwise-and:          5.0ms +/- 17.6%
    nsieve-bits:         22.2ms +/- 38.1%

  controlflow:           16.8ms +/- 42.3%
    recursive:           16.8ms +/- 42.3%

  crypto:                50.6ms +/- 13.1%
    aes:                 24.6ms +/- 16.2%
    md5:                 14.8ms +/- 31.1%
    sha1:                11.2ms +/- 29.8%

  date:                 108.4ms +/- 3.1%
    format-tofte:        64.4ms +/- 5.9%
    format-xparb:        44.0ms +/- 8.5%

  math:                  87.0ms +/- 14.8%
    cordic:              45.6ms +/- 14.8%
    partial-sums:        27.0ms +/- 29.5%
    spectral-norm:       14.4ms +/- 30.9%

  regexp:                48.8ms +/- 10.9%
    dna:                 48.8ms +/- 10.9%

  string:               188.2ms +/- 7.7%
    base64:              11.6ms +/- 36.0%
    fasta:               35.8ms +/- 17.6%
    tagcloud:            58.6ms +/- 17.3%
    unpack-code:         52.8ms +/- 3.9%
    validate-input:      29.4ms +/- 16.0%

well the flash issue's is partially fixed in todays nightly, it doesn't wig out at random anymore but it still has issues when scrolling

Same here, doesn't seem to be so flakey with flash which was my biggest problem with Beta 3.

Nice to have gifs load proper too now, no doubt it was fixed in the nightlies pretty quickly, but nice to have them load normally now, lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Happens to the best of us, bro. 😛 
    • Thanks to some of the other recent Windows improvements, I'm optimistic about this one. My quick wishlist would be: perf like the older menu, merge both menus or at the very least, the older menu should be a flyout, not a simulated click to the old menu, and lastly, a customization window to let users move items from one menu to another, so I could bring Send To back to the main menu, and the OneDrive settings to the older.
    • This Gigabyte AMD RX 9070 XT is very good deal despite the launch of 9070 GRE by Sayan Sen Recently we reviewed AMD's latest 1440p gaming card, the Radeon RX 9070 GRE 12GB, for $549. The card is in stock too at that price, though if you want significantly better performance and don't mind spending a bit more, the Gigabyte Gaming model of RX 9070 XT is currently on sale for just $650 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The card employs Gigabyte's WINDFORCE cooling system which combines multiple design elements such as alternate-spinning Hawk fans, a vapor chamber, and composite heat pipes to manage heat dissipation. The Server-grade Thermal conductive gel further helps in this department. The inclusion of a semi-passive cooling mode allows the fans to remain inactive under low workloads, which allows for reduced noise operation during lighter usage. There is dual BIOS switch that allows toggling between performance and silent modes. The technical specifications of the Gigabyte Radeon RX 9070 XT GAMING OC 16G are given in the table below: Specification Value Core Clock Boost Clock: up to 3060 MHz Game Clock: up to 2520 MHz Stream Processors 4096 Memory Clock 20 Gbps Memory Size 16GB Memory Type GDDR6 Memory Bus 256-bit Card Bus Interface PCI Express 5.0 Maximum Resolution 7680 × 4320 Multi-View Support 4 displays Card Dimensions L=288 mm, W=132 mm, H=56 mm Recommended Power Supply 750W Power Connectors 3 × 8-pin Video Outputs 2 × DisplayPort 2.1a 2 × HDMI 2.1b Get it at the link below: GIGABYTE Radeon RX 9070 XT Gaming OC 16GB Graphics Card, GV-R9070XTGAMING OC: $649.99 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $740) This Amazon deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Why does this kind of tactic not surprise me?
    • They used AI based TOOLS to convert the JavaScript engine (the main rendering engine is still C++) and it was not fully automated but was human reviewed. Other subsystems will be looked into to also be converted to Rust in the future. I have no problem with any of that.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      80
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      63
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!