Recommended Posts

The render-mode preference is outdated, Direct2D is controlled by it's own pref now.

And the DirectWrite pref is only there so you can mix it with old GDI rendering, mainly for performance testing I would think (Since it'd be slower than plain GDI or plain Direct2D)

So in conclusion I should use value 0 for pure Direct2D ? You got me confused... :)

I made some customizations to Firefox 4 b5 aiming for a clean and minimalist look. Tested on Windows 7 with custom theme.

16117kp.jpg

/* Font Tweaks*/
menubar, menubutton, menulist, menu, menuitem, textbox, toolbar, tab, .tab-text, tree, tooltip {
    font-size: 8pt !important;
    font-family: Calibri !important;
}

/* Remove the URL bar Go button*/
#go-button {
    display: none !important;
}

/* hide the Search Engine image*/
.searchbar-engine-image {
    display: none !important;
}

/* remove the search button (magnifying glass)*/
.search-go-button {
    display: none !important;
}

/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar*/
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
    display: none !important;
}

/*Hide Firefox Sync Statusbar Icon*/
#sync-status-button {
    display: none !important;
}

/*Disable tabstoolbar drag - enable newtab double clicking*/
#TabsToolbar {
    -moz-binding: none !important;
}

/*Transparent Firefox Button - no text*/
#appmenu-button {
    padding: 5px 28px 3px 0px !important;
    margin-top:3px !important;
    background-color: transparent !important;
}
#appmenu-button .button-text {
    display: none !important;
}

/*Reduce titlebar margin - choose margin according your windows theme (minimize, maximize close buttons)*/
#main-window {
    margin-top: -7px !important;
}
#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] {
    margin-top: -4px !important;
}

/*Remove some dropmarkers*/
#back-forward-dropmarker {
    display: none !important;
}
#urlbar > .autocomplete-history-dropmarker {
    display: none !important;
}
/*Transparency, hover and more naked UI*/
#PersonalToolbar, #nav-bar {
    background-color: transparent !important;
    border: none !important;
}
#nav-bar {
    margin-top: 1px !important;
}
#urlbar, #searchbar > *, #search-box {
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
    background: transparent !important;
    color: #000000 !important;
    border: none !important;
    -moz-box-shadow: none !important;
    height: 22px !important; /*Fix searchbar height without magnifying glass and search engine icon*/
}
#urlbar:hover, #searchbar:hover > *, .findbar-textbox:hover {
    background: rgba(255,255,255,.5) !important;
}
#browser-bottombox, #status-bar, #status-bar > *, #ybToolbar {
    background: rgba(255,255,255,.07) !important;
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
    border: #000000 !important;
}
.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]) {
    background: rgba(0,0,0,0.2) !important;
    color: #eeeeee !important;
    text-shadow: none !important;
}
.tabbrowser-tab[selected="true"] {
    background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, transparent, transparent 1px, rgba(255,255,255,.5) 1px, rgba(255,255,255,.5)) !important;
}
.tabs-newtab-button {
    background: transparent !important;
    border: #000000 !important;
}
.tabs-newtab-button:hover, #new-tab-button:hover, .scrollbutton-down:hover, .scrollbutton-up:hover, #alltabs-button:hover, #tabview-button:hover {
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
    background: none !important;
    border: #000000 !important;
}
.toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button, .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-dropmarker, .toolbarbutton-1 {
    background: transparent !important;
    border: none !important;
    -moz-box-shadow: none !important;
}

Just leave it on the default setting (which is -1, just right click on it and select reset)

Ok, thanks for clearing.

By the way noticed that i forgot to edit the "max version" in the fission add-on so you don't need to disable compatibility reporter so here it is: BETA 5 -> LINK ; BETA 6 - > LINK!!

The beta is incredibly sluggish for me, even with every addon disabled.. switching a tab takes like a second. Is this a known problem?

The ones I know are,

- Rendering Glitches w. Flash and D2D/D3D

- Severe Performance issues w. Flash and D2D in some cases

- Animated GIFs rape the CPU as of a week or so ago

- Scrolling was much smother ~10 days ago

- DownloadThemAll! uses more CPU w. D2D enabled

All these are known btw.

The version bump to 4.0b7pre took place today.

For what it's worth, I had to manually download today's nightly - the automatic update was stuck on 'Checking for updates...' (using yesterday's 4.0b6pre OS X build if it matters).

You can download today's nightly manually from here.

Firefox 4 beta 6 build 1 now available:

ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/4.0b6-candidates/build1/win32/en-US/Firefox%20Setup%204.0%20Beta%206.exe

Looks like build 2 is probably coming out very soon too.

Strange. Combined stop-go-reload button not present in this release ...

Well, obviously the development up to the anticipated 4.0 is going to be relatively slow and I don't think it's even slated to be released until next year. This way people who don't even know about minefield builds can still see the progress being made in regular intervals.

I was just wondering, why is Mozilla releasing so many betas of this? Other browsers would have already done been released.

Mozilla's development schedule is set out so that features land over a series of betas, with one being the "feature complete" milestone (For 4.0, it was Beta 5, but they moved it to Beta 6 to allow for some more development time on some things, but now that they're releasing a beta fix for a crash they're fiddled with the names), then small fixes make it in up until the RC stage.

Other groups may lay their schedule out so that features land in alpha, and beta is solely for testing. In other cases the beta's may actually just be more like release candidates, so you might get a couple then a release.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • App, useful & Teams shouldn't be used in the same sentence.
    • New Outlook for Windows and Web is getting a simple but very useful email feature by Sayan Sen Recently Microsoft put up a blog post highlighting not one, not two, but 15 total reasons why it feels you should switch to New Outlook already. If that was not enough, the company is bringing another new feature soon that could finally compel you to switch over to the new app. According to a recent update on the Microsoft 365 roadmap, the tech giant is making changes to how message sorting works when users choose criteria besides the traditional options of From, Subject, or Date Received. The idea is to provide better options for the attribute being used for sorting and make it easier to understand why messages appear in a particular order. For those unfamiliar Outlook already allows users to sort emails using a variety of fields including sender, category, importance, subject, and message size. Users can access these options through the Filter menu in Outlook for Windows and Outlook on the web. With the upcoming change, whenever users sort by a field other than From, Subject, or Date Received, Outlook will automatically display an additional column showing the value being used for the sort. For example, if messages are sorted by Size, a Size column will appear in the message list, allowing users to immediately see the data that determines the ordering of emails. Microsoft believes this should make sorting behavior simpler and reduce the need to manually adjust views or inspect individual messages. Support for sorting by Flag Due Date is also coming and should be especially be helpful for users who rely on email flags to manage follow-up tasks and deadlines. The feature is listed under Microsoft 365 Roadmap ID 564803 and is expected to reach general availability beginning later this month itself (June 2026). You can find the entry here. As always though, users should keep in mind that roadmap timelines can change and rollout schedules may occasionally be adjusted by Microsoft. Outlook for Web is also set to receive this feature.
    • That is true. but the liability side of my balance sheet is clean and has been for decades.  Nobody comes a knocking,  calling or writing harassing me for the money i owe them.😎👍  Haven't dealt with "a money changer" in decades and like Jesus it was in Jerusalem.  Don't have much money, but have even less stress in my life.👍👍     P.S.  Sorry, can't walk on water or change it to wine,  
    • Maybe ? DLSS Swapper (can swap the DLSS/FSR/XeSS versions) as long as the game (typically online/competitive) doesn't checks for file tampering. You can try different version(s) or update if not the current version of the FSR. https://github.com/beeradmoore/dlss-swapper
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!