Recommended Posts

The render-mode preference is outdated, Direct2D is controlled by it's own pref now.

And the DirectWrite pref is only there so you can mix it with old GDI rendering, mainly for performance testing I would think (Since it'd be slower than plain GDI or plain Direct2D)

So in conclusion I should use value 0 for pure Direct2D ? You got me confused... :)

I made some customizations to Firefox 4 b5 aiming for a clean and minimalist look. Tested on Windows 7 with custom theme.

16117kp.jpg

/* Font Tweaks*/
menubar, menubutton, menulist, menu, menuitem, textbox, toolbar, tab, .tab-text, tree, tooltip {
    font-size: 8pt !important;
    font-family: Calibri !important;
}

/* Remove the URL bar Go button*/
#go-button {
    display: none !important;
}

/* hide the Search Engine image*/
.searchbar-engine-image {
    display: none !important;
}

/* remove the search button (magnifying glass)*/
.search-go-button {
    display: none !important;
}

/* Kill bookmark icons in the Personal Toolbar*/
toolbarbutton.bookmark-item > .toolbarbutton-icon {
    display: none !important;
}

/*Hide Firefox Sync Statusbar Icon*/
#sync-status-button {
    display: none !important;
}

/*Disable tabstoolbar drag - enable newtab double clicking*/
#TabsToolbar {
    -moz-binding: none !important;
}

/*Transparent Firefox Button - no text*/
#appmenu-button {
    padding: 5px 28px 3px 0px !important;
    margin-top:3px !important;
    background-color: transparent !important;
}
#appmenu-button .button-text {
    display: none !important;
}

/*Reduce titlebar margin - choose margin according your windows theme (minimize, maximize close buttons)*/
#main-window {
    margin-top: -7px !important;
}
#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] {
    margin-top: -4px !important;
}

/*Remove some dropmarkers*/
#back-forward-dropmarker {
    display: none !important;
}
#urlbar > .autocomplete-history-dropmarker {
    display: none !important;
}
/*Transparency, hover and more naked UI*/
#PersonalToolbar, #nav-bar {
    background-color: transparent !important;
    border: none !important;
}
#nav-bar {
    margin-top: 1px !important;
}
#urlbar, #searchbar > *, #search-box {
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
    background: transparent !important;
    color: #000000 !important;
    border: none !important;
    -moz-box-shadow: none !important;
    height: 22px !important; /*Fix searchbar height without magnifying glass and search engine icon*/
}
#urlbar:hover, #searchbar:hover > *, .findbar-textbox:hover {
    background: rgba(255,255,255,.5) !important;
}
#browser-bottombox, #status-bar, #status-bar > *, #ybToolbar {
    background: rgba(255,255,255,.07) !important;
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
    border: #000000 !important;
}
.tabbrowser-tab:not([selected="true"]) {
    background: rgba(0,0,0,0.2) !important;
    color: #eeeeee !important;
    text-shadow: none !important;
}
.tabbrowser-tab[selected="true"] {
    background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(left, transparent, transparent 1px, rgba(255,255,255,.5) 1px, rgba(255,255,255,.5)) !important;
}
.tabs-newtab-button {
    background: transparent !important;
    border: #000000 !important;
}
.tabs-newtab-button:hover, #new-tab-button:hover, .scrollbutton-down:hover, .scrollbutton-up:hover, #alltabs-button:hover, #tabview-button:hover {
    -moz-appearance: none !important;
    background: none !important;
    border: #000000 !important;
}
.toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-button, .toolbarbutton-1 > .toolbarbutton-menubutton-dropmarker, .toolbarbutton-1 {
    background: transparent !important;
    border: none !important;
    -moz-box-shadow: none !important;
}

Just leave it on the default setting (which is -1, just right click on it and select reset)

Ok, thanks for clearing.

By the way noticed that i forgot to edit the "max version" in the fission add-on so you don't need to disable compatibility reporter so here it is: BETA 5 -> LINK ; BETA 6 - > LINK!!

The beta is incredibly sluggish for me, even with every addon disabled.. switching a tab takes like a second. Is this a known problem?

The ones I know are,

- Rendering Glitches w. Flash and D2D/D3D

- Severe Performance issues w. Flash and D2D in some cases

- Animated GIFs rape the CPU as of a week or so ago

- Scrolling was much smother ~10 days ago

- DownloadThemAll! uses more CPU w. D2D enabled

All these are known btw.

The version bump to 4.0b7pre took place today.

For what it's worth, I had to manually download today's nightly - the automatic update was stuck on 'Checking for updates...' (using yesterday's 4.0b6pre OS X build if it matters).

You can download today's nightly manually from here.

Firefox 4 beta 6 build 1 now available:

ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/4.0b6-candidates/build1/win32/en-US/Firefox%20Setup%204.0%20Beta%206.exe

Looks like build 2 is probably coming out very soon too.

Strange. Combined stop-go-reload button not present in this release ...

Well, obviously the development up to the anticipated 4.0 is going to be relatively slow and I don't think it's even slated to be released until next year. This way people who don't even know about minefield builds can still see the progress being made in regular intervals.

I was just wondering, why is Mozilla releasing so many betas of this? Other browsers would have already done been released.

Mozilla's development schedule is set out so that features land over a series of betas, with one being the "feature complete" milestone (For 4.0, it was Beta 5, but they moved it to Beta 6 to allow for some more development time on some things, but now that they're releasing a beta fix for a crash they're fiddled with the names), then small fixes make it in up until the RC stage.

Other groups may lay their schedule out so that features land in alpha, and beta is solely for testing. In other cases the beta's may actually just be more like release candidates, so you might get a couple then a release.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It won't perform hugely better than the 3080 unless you're VRAM limited in games. Have you tried putting new thermal pads on them 3080 and giving it a good clean to see if you can regain your temps and overclock?
    • Windows 95 offered the ability to add and edit the right click menus, on a per file type basis. This feature seems to be missing in the new file explorer. Are they bringing it back as a "new" feature?
    • It's nearly time to replace my aging Founders Edition 3080, it doesn't OC as nicely as it used to and it's running around 10c warmer than it did when I first bought it.  I don't have budget for much more than what I spent on the 3080 and locally, that means the best GPU I can manage is a 9070XT. On this basis I have a few questions: 1. At present I don't use ray tracing, if this was to change, would this GPU be an issue? 2. How does it compare on a performance basis? 3. Are the drivers worse or better than those for nVidia? 4. Linux support, is it there? 5. Anything else I should be aware of if I were to make this change? 6. Is it a good idea or shall I try and keep the 3080 a little longer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      69
    5. 5
      +Edouard
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!