Recommended Posts

Below, I've tried to simulate the mockup as closely as possible using only Stylish hacks from various people, but no extensions. The mockup is loaded in a tab for reference:

post-173518-12830619252549.png

These seem like somewhat basic changes, but they are taking an awfully long time to get into the UI.

I'm not saying I can do it, but I'm sure a dedicated CSS artist could make it look very close to the mockup using the current Gecko engine. Just make it look as close as possible, and if something is committed that messes up the layout, at least there is a layout and probably just a minor margin adjustment.

The question is, why hasn't this happened yet? Shouldn't there be just one bug filed on it called "Get SoapyHamHocks to make beta 4 look like the mockup" :p

That's really nice, closest I've seen yet. Could you please PM me the stylish scripts you're using?

No, there were many builds before yesterday as well. They just don't compile it nearly as frequently. Some days they'll post 2 or 3 builds and some days none. Maybe tonight or tomorrow there'll be an updated build to mess around with.

No, there were many builds before yesterday as well. They just don't compile it nearly as frequently. Some days they'll post 2 or 3 builds and some days none. Maybe tonight or tomorrow there'll be an updated build to mess around with.

Thanks so much.

Is there anything wrong with the build 4.0b7pre 17-09-2010?

- In gmail once you click BUZZ you cannot go back to INBOX. Pressing INBOX several times you are still stuck in the BUZZ page.

- Loading of pages are really slow as compared to the previous build(s).

I did a clear of complete cache (everything), even rebooted the system but the browsing still seems very slow. Anybody else facing similar slow browsing?

Win7 (64bit), FF (32bit) and just adblockplus (with custom filter)

Is there anything wrong with the build 4.0b7pre 17-09-2010?

- In gmail once you click BUZZ you cannot go back to INBOX. Pressing INBOX several times you are still stuck in the BUZZ page.

- Loading of pages are really slow as compared to the previous build(s).

I did a clear of complete cache (everything), even rebooted the system but the browsing still seems very slow. Anybody else facing similar slow browsing?

Win7 (64bit), FF (32bit) and just adblockplus (with custom filter)

I noticed that, also some issues with Google Calendar & editing events. Temporary problems I'm sure.

I recall reading about some issues with Google Mail JS/caching issues while browsing Fx stuff yesterday - I believe it's reported and being looked into.

New nightly doesn't follow redirects.

If I go to http://google.com, I get a page telling me to go to http://www.google.com

I believe this is an issue with a version of NoScript - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=9905879#p9905879

Latest nightlies are slow as hell in my work laptop. It has a shared Intel graphics card, so no D2D or accelerated layers can be enabled. Scrooling is a pain, worse than Firefox 3.6.

In the other hand IE9 just flies in here. Mozilla is really disppointing me :(

Same here :(

Latest nightlies are slow as hell in my work laptop. It has a shared Intel graphics card, so no D2D or accelerated layers can be enabled. Scrooling is a pain, worse than Firefox 3.6.

In the other hand IE9 just flies in here. Mozilla is really disppointing me :(

Same here :(

Same here, please contribute to the following bugs,

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595400

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595671

Latest nightlies are slow as hell in my work laptop. It has a shared Intel graphics card, so no D2D or accelerated layers can be enabled. Scrooling is a pain, worse than Firefox 3.6.

In the other hand IE9 just flies in here. Mozilla is really disppointing me :(

A nightly is not an official beta release (and can be broken or broke your profile) and only a tool for firefox dev. So maybe you should compare only what is comparable: IE9 (which is a beta) with firefox 4.0b6 ;)

And of course you have every rights to say that IE9 is better than firefox 4.0b6 if that you think...

whats up with the problem im having in ff4 where aero seems to be disabled or something. the problem never happens with ff3.6

I get that problem too? You mean where the Aero areas turn completely transparent/non-interactive and the window buttons disappear?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft announces the return of Xbox exclusives with Gears of War and Clockwork Revolution by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft had plenty of announcements to make today at the Xbox Games Showcase celebrating 25 years of the gaming brand. Now, under the leadership of the new Xbox CEO Asha Sharma, Xbox games are going back to their original release methods. She appeared in the livestream itself to announce the return of Xbox console exclusives. This means two major upcoming games from first-party studios won't be coming to PlayStation or Nintendo consoles: Gears of War: E-Day from The Coalition and Clockwork Revolution from InExile. Both titles will only be coming out on Xbox Series X|S consoles and Windows PCs, ditching any plans they had for PlayStation. "These are not timed exclusives," confirmed Microsoft. "We’re committed to investing in and growing XBOX both on console and beyond." The company confirmed that any already announced Xbox titles for PlayStation, under previous leadership, will continue to arrive for the rival platform. This means games like the new Halo remake, Forza Horizon 6, Fable, and State of Decay 3 will still be available on PlayStation, either at launch or later. It sounds like any new projects announced by the company will avoid other consoles in the same way. Microsoft first opened the floodgates by bringing titles like Sea of Thieves, Grounded, Hi-Fi Rush, and Pentiment to PlayStation and Nintendo consoles back in 2024. Since then, almost every new game release from Xbox Game Studios has arrived for rival consoles alongside Xbox and PC. This decision follows Sony's plans to ditch its own multiplatform releases too. Outside of multiplatform live service titles, the PlayStation maker is even abandoning its PC porting endeavors that started years ago.
    • I'm missing the beginning part of this equation... but for the sake of the convo, you don't get to take a $250(?) set of normally priced RAM, jack it up to over $500/600/800 just because of a market shift, then lower it back down to more than what it was originally and call that a "sale". Not the author of this post... the manufacturer/seller.
    • SpaceX has secured a significant cloud-services deal with Google, agreeing to a monthly payment of $920 million for computing power.  This agreement, covers approximately 110,000 NVIDIA GPUs and other components.... https://cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/investments/google-to-buy-computing-from-spacex-at-920-million-per-month/131543026    
    • no thanks is overpriced and its not the fastest ram neither.
    • It is, but it also has a bad performance reputation even on high-end gaming PCs. Some people say it's the engine's fault, others say it's the games developers' fault, who knows... At the end of the day, for the average gamer, the take is this: PC game with Unreal Engine 5? Be affraid and cross your fingers, it's a 50/50 chance.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!