Recommended Posts

Below, I've tried to simulate the mockup as closely as possible using only Stylish hacks from various people, but no extensions. The mockup is loaded in a tab for reference:

post-173518-12830619252549.png

These seem like somewhat basic changes, but they are taking an awfully long time to get into the UI.

I'm not saying I can do it, but I'm sure a dedicated CSS artist could make it look very close to the mockup using the current Gecko engine. Just make it look as close as possible, and if something is committed that messes up the layout, at least there is a layout and probably just a minor margin adjustment.

The question is, why hasn't this happened yet? Shouldn't there be just one bug filed on it called "Get SoapyHamHocks to make beta 4 look like the mockup" :p

That's really nice, closest I've seen yet. Could you please PM me the stylish scripts you're using?

No, there were many builds before yesterday as well. They just don't compile it nearly as frequently. Some days they'll post 2 or 3 builds and some days none. Maybe tonight or tomorrow there'll be an updated build to mess around with.

No, there were many builds before yesterday as well. They just don't compile it nearly as frequently. Some days they'll post 2 or 3 builds and some days none. Maybe tonight or tomorrow there'll be an updated build to mess around with.

Thanks so much.

Is there anything wrong with the build 4.0b7pre 17-09-2010?

- In gmail once you click BUZZ you cannot go back to INBOX. Pressing INBOX several times you are still stuck in the BUZZ page.

- Loading of pages are really slow as compared to the previous build(s).

I did a clear of complete cache (everything), even rebooted the system but the browsing still seems very slow. Anybody else facing similar slow browsing?

Win7 (64bit), FF (32bit) and just adblockplus (with custom filter)

Is there anything wrong with the build 4.0b7pre 17-09-2010?

- In gmail once you click BUZZ you cannot go back to INBOX. Pressing INBOX several times you are still stuck in the BUZZ page.

- Loading of pages are really slow as compared to the previous build(s).

I did a clear of complete cache (everything), even rebooted the system but the browsing still seems very slow. Anybody else facing similar slow browsing?

Win7 (64bit), FF (32bit) and just adblockplus (with custom filter)

I noticed that, also some issues with Google Calendar & editing events. Temporary problems I'm sure.

I recall reading about some issues with Google Mail JS/caching issues while browsing Fx stuff yesterday - I believe it's reported and being looked into.

New nightly doesn't follow redirects.

If I go to http://google.com, I get a page telling me to go to http://www.google.com

I believe this is an issue with a version of NoScript - http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?p=9905879#p9905879

Latest nightlies are slow as hell in my work laptop. It has a shared Intel graphics card, so no D2D or accelerated layers can be enabled. Scrooling is a pain, worse than Firefox 3.6.

In the other hand IE9 just flies in here. Mozilla is really disppointing me :(

Same here :(

Latest nightlies are slow as hell in my work laptop. It has a shared Intel graphics card, so no D2D or accelerated layers can be enabled. Scrooling is a pain, worse than Firefox 3.6.

In the other hand IE9 just flies in here. Mozilla is really disppointing me :(

Same here :(

Same here, please contribute to the following bugs,

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595400

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595671

Latest nightlies are slow as hell in my work laptop. It has a shared Intel graphics card, so no D2D or accelerated layers can be enabled. Scrooling is a pain, worse than Firefox 3.6.

In the other hand IE9 just flies in here. Mozilla is really disppointing me :(

A nightly is not an official beta release (and can be broken or broke your profile) and only a tool for firefox dev. So maybe you should compare only what is comparable: IE9 (which is a beta) with firefox 4.0b6 ;)

And of course you have every rights to say that IE9 is better than firefox 4.0b6 if that you think...

whats up with the problem im having in ff4 where aero seems to be disabled or something. the problem never happens with ff3.6

I get that problem too? You mean where the Aero areas turn completely transparent/non-interactive and the window buttons disappear?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!