Meet Firefox 4.0.1

By bogas04
in Web Browser Discussion & Support

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

The_Decryptor Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

OS X builds are now x64/i386, no more PPC support.

327671800.png

I still don't think J?gerMonkey has had the same type of optimisation on x64 that it's had on 32bit builds, so it may be slightly slower in that regard. But still, it's nice to see (unlike on Windows, OS X presents a different API on 64bit as it does on 32bit, so drawing APIs and such can take more precise input, etc.)

Grand Master

Corris Veteran

Posted
  • Veteran
Posted

Does anyone else have problems uploading with the Betas?

I can't upload to Facebook, Imageshack, Photobucket, it tries but always fails out meaning I have to use Safari to upload anything.

Nevermind it was user error, I had blocked the Firefox Plug-in container in LittleSnitch without noticing, works fine now, silly me, lol.

Enthusiast

mNiosu

Posted
Posted

Thanks for the link (Y)

and nice fix as usual, Soapy.

This one is even better (autohide styled addon-bar). Credits to dert07 !

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -21px;
  right: 1px;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s;
  padding-top: 22px !important;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 1px;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  bottom: -22px;
  right: 0;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar:hover {
  bottom: 0;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 0 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

Explorer

dert07

Posted
Posted

For everyone who doesn't like the current look of the new Addonbar SoapyHamHocks and I created a userstyle for Stylish that gives it the nice look from the early mockups. The width adjusts to the number of elements in the bar and doesn't take up the whole space at the bottom. It also auto-hides with a nice CSS transition so that it doesn't obscure the scrollbars all the time.

It is now available on our blog on http://boneyardbrew.posterous.com/firefox-4-addon-bar

Preview:

addonbar.jpg

Collaborator

vajlent

Posted
Posted

For everyone who doesn't like the current look of the new Addonbar SoapyHamHocks and I created a userstyle for Stylish that gives it the nice look from the early mockups. The width adjusts to the number of elements in the bar and doesn't take up the whole space at the bottom. It also auto-hides with a nice CSS transition so that it doesn't obscure the scrollbars all the time.

It is now available on our blog on http://boneyardbrew....fox-4-addon-bar

Preview:

addonbar.jpg

Nice one!

but the resolution text? what is it?

Grand Master

Steven P. Administrators

Posted
  • Administrators
Posted

For everyone who doesn't like the current look of the new Addonbar SoapyHamHocks and I created a userstyle for Stylish that gives it the nice look from the early mockups. The width adjusts to the number of elements in the bar and doesn't take up the whole space at the bottom. It also auto-hides with a nice CSS transition so that it doesn't obscure the scrollbars all the time.

It is now available on our blog on http://boneyardbrew.posterous.com/firefox-4-addon-bar

Preview:

addonbar.jpg

I'm using this as well, but now the find toolbar doesn't show when I click ctrl + f

Disabling all styles makes it come back, how to fix?

Veteran

bogas04

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks for that and I have installed it the whole Status bar / Addon Bar has vanished and I do not know how to disable it as I can't seem to get access to Stylish to remove it. I'm using FF beta 6

beta 6 doesnt have addon bar !

Enthusiast

mNiosu

Posted
Posted

I'm using this as well, but now the find toolbar doesn't show when I click ctrl + f

Disabling all styles makes it come back, how to fix?

As people said earlier on your thread the fix is adding "bottom: 0px;" to "#browser-bottombox" but the find-bar doesn't look to good. That's why I made this next stile for find bar (with the help of foxxyn8, cheers mate!):

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

#FindToolbar .findbar-container {
  margin-bottom: -1px !important;
  margin-left: 5px !important;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

#browser-bottombox {background: none !important;}

#FindToolbar {border:none !important;}

#FindToolbar .find-status-icon:not([status="notfound"]):not([status="wrapped"]) {
display:none !important;
}

They only work if you add the "bottom: 0px;" line and uses the color theme of SoapyHamHocks/dert07 style. Here is my custom version of their style:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -22px;
  right: 1px;
  margin-right: 20px !important;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .7s 2s ease-in;
  padding-top: 22px !important;
}

#browser-bottombox {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: 0px;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 0;
 -moz-transition: bottom .7s 1s ease-out;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  right: 0;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

Feel free to edit the background color and borders/margins to your liking ...

post-344974-12857651906994.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • This new cabinet design lets you run AMD, Intel, and Nvidia PCs inside one case

      By ChickyBoom · Posted

      Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • Hi my name is Olivia and I am from Australia

      By WITHOUT-ME · Posted

      is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • I Can't Wrap My Head Around This Number - Google to buy computing from SpaceX at $920 million per month

      By WITHOUT-ME · Posted

      just 0.035% of their budget
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups

      By zikalify · Posted

      Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
    • Politically funny images of the World

      By Michael Scrip · Posted

  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!