Recommended Posts

OS X builds are now x64/i386, no more PPC support.

327671800.png

I still don't think J?gerMonkey has had the same type of optimisation on x64 that it's had on 32bit builds, so it may be slightly slower in that regard. But still, it's nice to see (unlike on Windows, OS X presents a different API on 64bit as it does on 32bit, so drawing APIs and such can take more precise input, etc.)

Does anyone else have problems uploading with the Betas?

I can't upload to Facebook, Imageshack, Photobucket, it tries but always fails out meaning I have to use Safari to upload anything.

Nevermind it was user error, I had blocked the Firefox Plug-in container in LittleSnitch without noticing, works fine now, silly me, lol.

Thanks for the link (Y)

and nice fix as usual, Soapy.

This one is even better (autohide styled addon-bar). Credits to dert07 !

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -21px;
  right: 1px;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s;
  padding-top: 22px !important;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 1px;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  bottom: -22px;
  right: 0;
  -moz-transition: bottom .5s;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar:hover {
  bottom: 0;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 0 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

For everyone who doesn't like the current look of the new Addonbar SoapyHamHocks and I created a userstyle for Stylish that gives it the nice look from the early mockups. The width adjusts to the number of elements in the bar and doesn't take up the whole space at the bottom. It also auto-hides with a nice CSS transition so that it doesn't obscure the scrollbars all the time.

It is now available on our blog on http://boneyardbrew.posterous.com/firefox-4-addon-bar

Preview:

addonbar.jpg

For everyone who doesn't like the current look of the new Addonbar SoapyHamHocks and I created a userstyle for Stylish that gives it the nice look from the early mockups. The width adjusts to the number of elements in the bar and doesn't take up the whole space at the bottom. It also auto-hides with a nice CSS transition so that it doesn't obscure the scrollbars all the time.

It is now available on our blog on http://boneyardbrew....fox-4-addon-bar

Preview:

addonbar.jpg

Nice one!

but the resolution text? what is it?

For everyone who doesn't like the current look of the new Addonbar SoapyHamHocks and I created a userstyle for Stylish that gives it the nice look from the early mockups. The width adjusts to the number of elements in the bar and doesn't take up the whole space at the bottom. It also auto-hides with a nice CSS transition so that it doesn't obscure the scrollbars all the time.

It is now available on our blog on http://boneyardbrew.posterous.com/firefox-4-addon-bar

Preview:

addonbar.jpg

I'm using this as well, but now the find toolbar doesn't show when I click ctrl + f

Disabling all styles makes it come back, how to fix?

Thanks for that and I have installed it the whole Status bar / Addon Bar has vanished and I do not know how to disable it as I can't seem to get access to Stylish to remove it. I'm using FF beta 6

beta 6 doesnt have addon bar !

I'm using this as well, but now the find toolbar doesn't show when I click ctrl + f

Disabling all styles makes it come back, how to fix?

As people said earlier on your thread the fix is adding "bottom: 0px;" to "#browser-bottombox" but the find-bar doesn't look to good. That's why I made this next stile for find bar (with the help of foxxyn8, cheers mate!):

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

#FindToolbar .findbar-container {
  margin-bottom: -1px !important;
  margin-left: 5px !important;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

#browser-bottombox {background: none !important;}

#FindToolbar {border:none !important;}

#FindToolbar .find-status-icon:not([status="notfound"]):not([status="wrapped"]) {
display:none !important;
}

They only work if you add the "bottom: 0px;" line and uses the color theme of SoapyHamHocks/dert07 style. Here is my custom version of their style:

@namespace url(http://www.mozilla.org/keymaster/gatekeeper/there.is.only.xul);

#addon-bar {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: -22px;
  right: 1px;
  margin-right: 20px !important;
  border: 0 !important;
  -moz-appearance: none !important;
  -moz-transition: bottom .7s 2s ease-in;
  padding-top: 22px !important;
}

#browser-bottombox {
  position: fixed;
  bottom: 0px;
}

#addon-bar:hover {
 bottom: 0;
 -moz-transition: bottom .7s 1s ease-out;
}

#main-window[sizemode="maximized"] #addon-bar {
  right: 0;
}

#addon-bar > #status-bar {
  margin: 0 !important;
  padding: 0 2px 0 2px;
  border-radius: 4px 4px 0 0;
  border: 0 !important;
  border-left: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-right: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  border-top: 1px solid rgba(0,0,0,.25) !important;
  background-color: rgb(207, 219, 236) !important;
  background-image: -moz-linear-gradient(rgba(255,255,255,.5), rgb(207,220,236)) !important;
  box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(255,255,255,.5) inset;
}

Feel free to edit the background color and borders/margins to your liking ...

post-344974-12857651906994.jpg

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
    • I can answer about the Linux bit. I only used AMD GPUs. I currently have a 9060XT (8GB) that fits my needs, I'm not a gamer, so I don't need that much GDDR. But lately, NVIDIA has grown a lot in the recent years. Oh, the horrors of NVIDIA drivers not working. But they have been getting better. I know a lot of members onm here that are running cachyOS and other distros, and are fine with a 4090/5090 variants. Really, though, I would stick with AMD variants.
    • Everything they say you can already do yourself on the registry by changing some things.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!