Recommended Posts

post-45228-12865944764862.png

Is this the progress bar you are talking about or are you talking about the proposed top of tabs progress bar? I think they should use the former and fill the whole address bar instead of the tiny line. When cropping the image I noticed it isn't even drawn properly as half of the line sits outside the address bar.

post-45228-12865944764862.png

Is this the progress bar you are talking about or are you talking about the proposed top of tabs progress bar? I think they should use the former and fill the whole address bar instead of the tiny line. When cropping the image I noticed it isn't even drawn properly as half of the line sits outside the address bar.

Sounds like both progress bars are causing problems - address bar and tab. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602964

I really don't see the point in comparing JS speed, unless the benchmark is something time sensitive (i.e. rendering operations or such where it has to be completed within a set time frame) or the difference is massive (like older IE versions where the benchmark might take 10 minutes, vs. 10 seconds in Firefox/Chrome/Safari)

For example, Firefox is 74ms faster than Safari on the v8 benchmark, but so what? That's less than 1/10th of a second difference.

Well, not for any other browser but Firefox, because Firefox in itself relies a lot on XUL, which includes javascript.

is the final release still set for late Oct/Nov

cant wait to start using it

I would say more likely january 2011 :(

they are struggling to even get beta 7 released (still 14 blockers left and it has been this for awhile!)

and there is still another beta (this might not be out till november at the current rate we are going) and release candidates after that to get through before the final release even...

Here is what is blocking the final release: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=blocking2.0%3Afinal

As you can see we have a long time to go!

is the final release still set for late Oct/Nov

cant wait to start using it

Guessing by the state of the Firefox 4.0 nightly builds there is no way for Mozilla to get it out of the door before the end of 2010 unless they start cutting even more features.

Firefox 4.0 is in a way Mozilla's Windows Vista in the making: Too many promises, features are being cut during development, the end result looks to become mediocre compared to other browsers.

Here's hoping they can get it right with 4.1/4.5 or whatever 4.next will be called.

So I havent tryed the nightlys for a while but got bord of waiting for b7 thought id give them a try...wow it looks horrible

all of the loading bars look horrible on the tabs and in the url bar they just don't fit in with the theme also why are the tabs now a horrible grey colour they looked fine in b6 why change them, the removal of the status bar is fine..aslong as you replace the functionallity..they havent I have no script ad block and stylish I have no way of getting to them without having horrible big buttons in the main menu and because the new "firefox menu button thing" is pretty rubbish I have to click about 6 times to get add on options.

Im really dissapointed with the way firefox is going...

So I havent tryed the nightlys for a while but got bord of waiting for b7 thought id give them a try...wow it looks horrible

all of the loading bars look horrible on the tabs and in the url bar they just don't fit in with the theme also why are the tabs now a horrible grey colour they looked fine in b6 why change them, the removal of the status bar is fine..aslong as you replace the functionallity..they havent I have no script ad block and stylish I have no way of getting to them without have horrible big buttons in the main menu and because the new "firefox menu button thing" is pretty rubbish I have to click about 6 times to get add on options.

Im really dissapointed with the way firefox is going...

Well I'm not. The problem are the bugs. It's taking to long to fix them. But I think Mozilla is heading in the right direction with Firefox. After FX4 is released they should focus on speed.

Am I tripping or does the original mock-ups look a hell of a lot better than the beta UI?

Mockup

post-307746-1286740756117.png

Beta

post-307746-12867407708751.jpg

I've complained about this in this thread before, the current Beta UI looks like a train wreck and over the last few weeks there's be no attempt to fix that.

Am I tripping or does the original mock-ups look a hell of a lot better than the beta UI?

Mockup

post-307746-1286740756117.png

Beta

post-307746-12867407708751.jpg

That Beta, is like Firefox Beta 1 or 2. Doesn't have the new tabs at all. It still has a ways to go though, give it time. Still a lot to accomplish.

I've complained about this in this thread before, the current Beta UI looks like a train wreck and over the last few weeks there's be no attempt to fix that.

Look at the bug trackers. ;) Still LOTS of work to be done before it's final.

There really isn't one.

I mean, the current builds don't have the shadow around everything, or the connecting curves (that's coming though, the mac theme needs it), but apart from that it's basically the same.

The difference between having curves and shadows...

post-307746-12867695361687.jpg

... and not having curves and shadows.

post-307746-12867695297335.png

It's like A1 steak sauce... yeah, it's that important. :D

I have to agree with neudera and thealexweb, the beta's UI looks more like a pathetic rip-off rather than a polished work of art.

And they've even decided to get rid of the progress bars, there's still problems with performance and rendering... etc etc. Its disappointing.

I've got a feeling that Firefox 4.0 is going to be a half-baked release, which will soon be followed by 4.1.x releases to buff out the kinks.

The difference between having curves and shadows...

post-307746-12867695361687.jpg

... and not having curves and shadows.

post-307746-12867695297335.png

It's like A1 steak sauce... yeah, it's that important. :D

Yeah... there's a fair bit of difference between Aero on Windows 7 and Classic on Windows 98 that has nothing to do with shadows and curves.

Yeah... there's a fair bit of difference between Aero on Windows 7 and Classic on Windows 98 that has nothing to do with shadows and curves.

You know what I was getting at. An unpolished UI isn't worth anything. Do it right or don't do it at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One reason it might be running hotter is dust build up within the cooling or perhaps the paste has dried out. You could always try repasting your old GPU and cleaning the cooler. Your experience in Linux will be much better with an AMD GPU; the performance in gaming is much closer to Windows than nVidia would be. I personally think on Windows, AMD drivers are junk.
    • I reviewed it back in March, but I didn't have a 5070 at the time https://www.neowin.net/reviews/amd-rx-9070-review-vs-rtx-5070-4070-and-rx-9070-xt-7800-xt--just-good-enough/ When I reviewed the 9070 I did have a 5070 to compare it against, so the scores are there for the 9070 XT. it outperforms the 5070 in raster, and is barely neck and neck in Ray Tracing. So it's better than a 5070 in everything but Ray Tracing where it is neck and neck, or just under. To be honest, the uplift from 3080 when it was new to the 9070 XT is not as great a step up. If you can find a used 4080 Super for around the same money, you would probably be better off, but if you only want to buy new then the 16GB 9070 XT is the best value for money in its category.
    • I really hope the author's health is ok. Squirreling away a official backup of this software. Looks like the internet archive already cached a copy as well - https://web.archive.org/web/20...ldbit-soft.fi/software.html
    • AMD is supported out of the box in linux because of their open source driver. Nvidia does not. All my systems are amd and all of them work nicely on linux arch without doing anything.
    • Never had a problem with TPM and started using that many years ago in Win10. Through several motherboards and OS versions, it just does what it does without complaint. My games library doesn't even know it's there. Secure boot does a lot more than support anti-cheat, as it came along long before anti-cheat software. I've used it religiously since before I started using TPM, and I always liked it for being able to nullify virus contagions that try their best to come in underneath the firmware during boot, so that the OS doesn't see them, etc. That is its purpose, imo. I'll never understand why people who elect to use another OS feel compelled to run down Windows... I guess they need to do that to feel secure about their choices? I run Windows because it supports all the software (including games) natively that I want to buy, and I've never had to run down another OS to make me feel better about it. (Although it's certainly possible to do that, of course...) Win10 is on a ventilator atm, and Win11 is very close to being free, and I finally got to stop running StartAllBack as I moved to the Experimental/Dev channel and my 26300.8553 build supports the moveable taskbar and it's running fine at the top of the screen! Finally, my last major dislike of Win11 is being rectified! So, I'm not at all surprised to see Win11's share of the Steam survey hitting 70%.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!