Recommended Posts

There are lots of UI bugs and polish to be landed. But currently they are focusing on features and speed.

Firefox 2 & 3 felt lightweight and fast compared to other browsers. Now it feels like the big slow clunky one.

Well that is when comparing to IE which everyone was using at the time. It is still faster then IE ( IE9 being close / better depending on your PC )

Firefox isnt getting slower, Webkit is just damn fast.

Wekbit is pretty damn fast, yes, but Presto, in my opinion, is even more blindingly fast (Opera). I just wish Firefox had caught up more quickly, I understand it doesn't have the commercial power that Google and OSA have, but still. I loved that browser and I still feel the addons platform was the best there ever was. I hope things buck up for them soon.

...

Firefox isnt getting slower, Webkit is just damn fast.

And Firefox is catching up pretty fast, they're already faster than WebKit (Safari) on the v8 benchmark. And it's not far behind on SunSpider.

But, you'll always be able to find something that one browser is good at, that another browser isn't good at, the Biolab <canvas> game hits 60fps on my Mac in Safari, 50-52fps in Firefox (55fps+ in 32bit mode), while IE9 only gets 9-12fps on my PC with it.

I've lost my faith in Firefox :(. Maybe again, someday, but each time I try it, it just feels slower and slower than the competitors. It was amazing when I first started using it (Firefox 2) but since then, it's been getting overtaken.

Yeah they need to work on the responsiveness of the UI the most. Does anyone else feel the UI is very laggy compared to all the competing browsers? Even compared to firefox 3.x. The whole UI often becomes unresponsive for a second when loading groups of tabs. Chrome and opera do not do this. Chrome and opera also have much smoother tab open and close animation, firefox's often lag. I have a quad core, the ui should not be this laggy for a browser.

They should have a dedicated group of testers and forum not open to the public. When I read headlines like "Things I hate about Mozilla Firefox 4.0" on sites like AskVG, it's time to pull public testing. Why would you let ALPHA builds out to test publicly? The public is not intelligent enough to test half baked software and "give constructive input to the developers" and not flame it on every blog and forum. No one likes the looks? You must have forgot all the hard work software writers have done to create a website at Mozilla called THEMES & ADDONS. Have you ever liked the default look of any browser? I sure haven't, there all butt ugly. Great thing you can make it look like you want, isn't it?

oh hey is beta 7 skipped?

Nope,Beta 7 is still planned on being released. whatever they finishing on fixing those 15 beta 7 blockers.

Yeah they need to work on the responsiveness of the UI the most. Does anyone else feel the UI is very laggy compared to all the competing browsers? Even compared to firefox 3.x. The whole UI often becomes unresponsive for a second when loading groups of tabs. Chrome and opera do not do this. Chrome and opera also have much smoother tab open and close animation, firefox's often lag. I have a quad core, the ui should not be this laggy for a browser.

Yea i get that as well, it gotten so annoying with the lagging i had to switch to opera,chrome until Beta 7 is released. the ui shouldn't be that laggy at all those issues should of been fixed in the previous beta's ,hopefully those issues will be fixed in the soon to be release beta 7.

Can you really make Firefox look good in Linux though ?

Good? Maybe not, but not repulsive. Depends greatly on what desktop environment and what distro. I actually like firefox in Ubuntu with a few addons like omnibar. I use 7x86 primarily, so when I use linux my preference is gnome. Kde is so close to Windows in shine and attraction that theres no point in dual booting it. Firefox integrates perfectly into each of there themes, you just have to like the look of linux.

Firefox may be slower in development, but their also focused on a more complex architecture that expands user control and eases the addition of millions of available features and customizations, all through a few clicks. No other browser offers everything that Firefox does, that's why it's still used more than Chrome & Opera, even though it's not as fast. Can you imagine the headache the developers have trying to maintain cross platform compatibility? I really feel for those people!

As of today's nightly the progress bars in the address bar (active tab)/on top of the tab (inactive tab) are gone. Instead there is a throbber again. See screenshot:

post-1302-12868920484445.png

that looks incredibly nice compared to the ugly progress bars - specially the black ones i had :s

There is a difference between our development and Chrome etc development , they dont really care about version numbers , but we do ,like Opera 10 wasnt that fast ,but Opera 10.5 was , and likeways , chrome never thought of numbers sincerely lol , but Firefox does , and the thing is , they are building an engine too, Gecko 2.0 , so they have think wisely , but then this is also true that we dont have many developers , we are open source anyways , u have a patch , send it :D

But with Chrome etc , its like , u do this , u do that , its not "we will do this" , that's the difference i guess

Whatever it is, i love firefox and its method of development, though slow , but gr8

As of today's nightly the progress bars in the address bar (active tab)/on top of the tab (inactive tab) are gone. Instead there is a throbber again. See screenshot:

post-1302-12868920484445.png

I didn't get that until I disabled Tabmix plus. Apparently that extension breaks everything from the tab scrolling animations to throbbers. If anyone knows of a good alternative that gives me at least most of the functionality of TMP, feel free to send me a PM.

I think the throbber looks surprisingly good, and does a much better job of showing activity than the loading bars ever did. It didn't help that they were kind of easy to miss at first, and sort of blended into each other when there were a lot of tabs loading at once.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!