Recommended Posts

they disabled it in the latest builds again for whatever reason

Is it possible to turn off the tabs in titlebar then?

why turn it off? they left plenty of room between the tabs and the firefox button to drag the window

why turn it off? they left plenty of room between the tabs and the firefox button to drag the window

I would turn it off because I don't consider that space to be plenty of room at all. It's a space smaller than any button I've ever seen, in between two other big, clickable targets, and made even worse by the fact that one of them is a tab that can be dragged out of the window. I could live with having the top-left corner next to the App-button being the Aero-snap spot, because I really like how easy it is to select tabs when they're at the absolute edge. But I realize others would rather have that corner be a part of the App-button instead.

What are they planning to do?

argh the tab animations lag even worse on my laptop (2.0ghz core2 duo, 4gb ram, mobility hd2600) Its alright on my desktop now though as long as I don't have any flash/tabs windows open. If I have another window open with a flash video the whole UI becomes laggy. I really hope they are working on this lol.

I am having the same problem but when I have a lot of tabs open and use tab candy. Sucks.

Hope they fix it.

I cant understand mozilla or firefox team, WHAT THE HELL are they doing with the UI, first the tabs on the top and eliminate the menu and title bar, later the position of stop and reload button and NOW they eliminate the status bar.

The main issue of firefox its not the UI, i like the UI and so its the mayority of those that its still using firefox 3.6 and if we can account for ie, safari and firefox users we are the mayority, if people hated the firefox interface it the first place they changed to chrome or opera or MAYBE they customize it they way they wanted it.

Why screw your loyal users in changing the UI just for the sake of the minority, i cant understand it, what its worse its that they think that copying chrome make sense... Most of the people i know that changed to chrome from firefox its because of the PERFORMANCE and SPEED, and that should be the main focus of mozilla o firefox team.

STOP messing the UI and forcing things (like the elimination of the status bar), one reason that people like firefox its because its one of the most customizable browser, and sure i can customize the thing a wanted it seems that the core functionality its force for those changes in the interface and that its so wrong.

I remember when ie moved to version 7 and people sticked with 6 it took almost two version from 6 to 8 so that the less savvy person can get used to it and now microsoft its changing it again with ie9.

Firefox dont need a change the ui, if people dont want the status bar they can disable it, but by eliminating it you dont give option to those that use it.. I think that firefox team its in the middle of identity crisis...

I feel the exact same way. I'm sick and tired of them making FF look like Chrome. I don't understand why they took out the "option" to have a status bar. If these Chrome lovers want FF to look like it, let them. But don't force me to use the new style. I love FF because of the options that no other browser allows, but it looks as if I'll go back to using IE as my main browser since FF was released.

I feel the exact same way. I'm sick and tired of them making FF look like Chrome. I don't understand why they took out the "option" to have a status bar. If these Chrome lovers want FF to look like it, let them. But don't force me to use the new style. I love FF because of the options that no other browser allows, but it looks as if I'll go back to using IE as my main browser since FF was released.

IE9 looks like it'll be pretty great. I really want to see an answer from Firefox to IE9's ability to pin sites to the taskbar. Still, I'm not sure I get why you would mention IE as a viable alternative when you say you preferred Firefox because of how customizable it is. IE's not really a competitor in that regard. For one thing, there's no status bar.

I feel the exact same way. I'm sick and tired of them making FF look like Chrome. I don't understand why they took out the "option" to have a status bar. If these Chrome lovers want FF to look like it, let them. But don't force me to use the new style. I love FF because of the options that no other browser allows, but it looks as if I'll go back to using IE as my main browser since FF was released.

I don't think you will be very happy with ie9 then, as it removed the statusbar.

And firefox 3.6's default UI looks pretty atrocious and dated, I think a lot of people do want this change. Calling them a minority is silly.

This site stopped working for me with the latest nightly :/ http://nederland.fm

Normally I click on Radio 538 3rd image down from the left.. but instead of loading the player it redirects to http://nederland.fm/radio/radio538/radio-538-heeft-het.html now.

Having to listen via Google Chrome now.

Cookies are enabled, AdBlock Plus disabled on that site and I don't block Javascript there either. (worked until I just applied the update).

This site stopped working for me with the latest nightly :/ http://nederland.fm

Normally I click on Radio 538 3rd image down from the left.. but instead of loading the player it redirects to http://nederland.fm/radio/radio538/radio-538-heeft-het.html now.

Having to listen via Google Chrome now.

Cookies are enabled, AdBlock Plus disabled on that site and I don't block Javascript there either. (worked until I just applied the update).

that's what you get for listening to Radio 538 :p

isn't there some kind of flash player on the station's official website?

the latest x64 nightlies are giving me loads of flash-related problems. it crashes like 9 out of 10 times.

That's what I get for running x64 I guess..

I don't think you will be very happy with ie9 then, as it removed the statusbar.

And firefox 3.6's default UI looks pretty atrocious and dated, I think a lot of people do want this change. Calling them a minority is silly.

No statusbar? Looks like it'll be suicide for me then.

:(

I would venture to say perhaps after the next beta/RC i will switch to using this full time rather than the current builds. However, as slow as the progression is going due to some hurdles they are overcoming i am not sure how long that will take lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • add $200 and get DWARF 3 model add $2000 and visit scientists center in your town add $20000 and visit the biggest telescope in Chile
    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!