Recommended Posts

they disabled it in the latest builds again for whatever reason

Is it possible to turn off the tabs in titlebar then?

why turn it off? they left plenty of room between the tabs and the firefox button to drag the window

why turn it off? they left plenty of room between the tabs and the firefox button to drag the window

I would turn it off because I don't consider that space to be plenty of room at all. It's a space smaller than any button I've ever seen, in between two other big, clickable targets, and made even worse by the fact that one of them is a tab that can be dragged out of the window. I could live with having the top-left corner next to the App-button being the Aero-snap spot, because I really like how easy it is to select tabs when they're at the absolute edge. But I realize others would rather have that corner be a part of the App-button instead.

What are they planning to do?

argh the tab animations lag even worse on my laptop (2.0ghz core2 duo, 4gb ram, mobility hd2600) Its alright on my desktop now though as long as I don't have any flash/tabs windows open. If I have another window open with a flash video the whole UI becomes laggy. I really hope they are working on this lol.

I am having the same problem but when I have a lot of tabs open and use tab candy. Sucks.

Hope they fix it.

I cant understand mozilla or firefox team, WHAT THE HELL are they doing with the UI, first the tabs on the top and eliminate the menu and title bar, later the position of stop and reload button and NOW they eliminate the status bar.

The main issue of firefox its not the UI, i like the UI and so its the mayority of those that its still using firefox 3.6 and if we can account for ie, safari and firefox users we are the mayority, if people hated the firefox interface it the first place they changed to chrome or opera or MAYBE they customize it they way they wanted it.

Why screw your loyal users in changing the UI just for the sake of the minority, i cant understand it, what its worse its that they think that copying chrome make sense... Most of the people i know that changed to chrome from firefox its because of the PERFORMANCE and SPEED, and that should be the main focus of mozilla o firefox team.

STOP messing the UI and forcing things (like the elimination of the status bar), one reason that people like firefox its because its one of the most customizable browser, and sure i can customize the thing a wanted it seems that the core functionality its force for those changes in the interface and that its so wrong.

I remember when ie moved to version 7 and people sticked with 6 it took almost two version from 6 to 8 so that the less savvy person can get used to it and now microsoft its changing it again with ie9.

Firefox dont need a change the ui, if people dont want the status bar they can disable it, but by eliminating it you dont give option to those that use it.. I think that firefox team its in the middle of identity crisis...

I feel the exact same way. I'm sick and tired of them making FF look like Chrome. I don't understand why they took out the "option" to have a status bar. If these Chrome lovers want FF to look like it, let them. But don't force me to use the new style. I love FF because of the options that no other browser allows, but it looks as if I'll go back to using IE as my main browser since FF was released.

I feel the exact same way. I'm sick and tired of them making FF look like Chrome. I don't understand why they took out the "option" to have a status bar. If these Chrome lovers want FF to look like it, let them. But don't force me to use the new style. I love FF because of the options that no other browser allows, but it looks as if I'll go back to using IE as my main browser since FF was released.

IE9 looks like it'll be pretty great. I really want to see an answer from Firefox to IE9's ability to pin sites to the taskbar. Still, I'm not sure I get why you would mention IE as a viable alternative when you say you preferred Firefox because of how customizable it is. IE's not really a competitor in that regard. For one thing, there's no status bar.

I feel the exact same way. I'm sick and tired of them making FF look like Chrome. I don't understand why they took out the "option" to have a status bar. If these Chrome lovers want FF to look like it, let them. But don't force me to use the new style. I love FF because of the options that no other browser allows, but it looks as if I'll go back to using IE as my main browser since FF was released.

I don't think you will be very happy with ie9 then, as it removed the statusbar.

And firefox 3.6's default UI looks pretty atrocious and dated, I think a lot of people do want this change. Calling them a minority is silly.

This site stopped working for me with the latest nightly :/ http://nederland.fm

Normally I click on Radio 538 3rd image down from the left.. but instead of loading the player it redirects to http://nederland.fm/radio/radio538/radio-538-heeft-het.html now.

Having to listen via Google Chrome now.

Cookies are enabled, AdBlock Plus disabled on that site and I don't block Javascript there either. (worked until I just applied the update).

This site stopped working for me with the latest nightly :/ http://nederland.fm

Normally I click on Radio 538 3rd image down from the left.. but instead of loading the player it redirects to http://nederland.fm/radio/radio538/radio-538-heeft-het.html now.

Having to listen via Google Chrome now.

Cookies are enabled, AdBlock Plus disabled on that site and I don't block Javascript there either. (worked until I just applied the update).

that's what you get for listening to Radio 538 :p

isn't there some kind of flash player on the station's official website?

the latest x64 nightlies are giving me loads of flash-related problems. it crashes like 9 out of 10 times.

That's what I get for running x64 I guess..

I don't think you will be very happy with ie9 then, as it removed the statusbar.

And firefox 3.6's default UI looks pretty atrocious and dated, I think a lot of people do want this change. Calling them a minority is silly.

No statusbar? Looks like it'll be suicide for me then.

:(

I would venture to say perhaps after the next beta/RC i will switch to using this full time rather than the current builds. However, as slow as the progression is going due to some hurdles they are overcoming i am not sure how long that will take lol.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!