Recommended Posts

I'm a bit surprised by the speed of which FF4b11 runs, because it runs so much faster than FF 3.6.13. Every page I visit loads / renders a lot faster than before. Since I haven't used any of the FF4 betas before the speed difference is perhaps more obvious to me than to someone who has been using all the betas, but I was pleasantly surprised when using FF4b11 for the first time.

Is anyone else having the search box get stuck on a search engine? It seems to be happening to me randomly over the last few days where It would get stuck on Wikipedia or ebay and won't change back to Google. I either have to restart the browser, or change a setting inside of the manage search extensions. I've been running the nightly and keeping up to date, but it was happening before Beta 11 was released, so It may be present in that version too.

Here's IE9/FX4/FX3.6 on my computer, FX3.6 using GDI and IE9/FX4 using DirectWrite.

IE9:

157589776.png

Firefox 4:

959827934.png

Firefox 3.6:

849531858.png

The only differences between the IE9 and FX4 screenshot is a different character position (IE9 starts off slightly to the left), and Firefox 4 is doing shaping (ligatures, etc.) while IE9 isn't (look at the "fi")

I suppose its time for final countdown , the final release seems "weeks" far to "me" , so i feel the need to tell u guys about this addon (though most of u already know about it , so dont laugh @ me , i am very emotional haha)

Just install this addon and get the hard blocker counter for the final release https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hard-blockers-counter/

It looks like your IE9 picture is using GDI rendering, which is only for cases where it can't use DirectWrite.

When it's using DirectWrite, it'll match Firefox 4.

that's the thing. IE9 uses GDI on smaller font sizes, and DirectWrite on larger ones it would seem. Which is good.

I suppose its time for final countdown , the final release seems "weeks" far to "me" , so i feel the need to tell u guys about this addon (though most of u already know about it , so dont laugh @ me , i am very emotional haha)

*Installs* Thanks that's a great addon :)

Just install this addon and get the hard blocker counter for the final release https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hard-blockers-counter/

that's the thing. IE9 uses GDI on smaller font sizes, and DirectWrite on larger ones it would seem. Which is good.

Nope, IE9 uses DirectWrite at any size, the switch is based on the page's doctype (Quirks mode gets GDI, Standards mode gets DirectWrite/Direct2D)

You can mix the two APIs, but the result is much slower than either one by themselves (so you don't want to do it in practise)

And it's another reason to use a standards mode doctype when designing pages, you get hardware acceleration in IE9.

I suppose its time for final countdown , the final release seems "weeks" far to "me" , so i feel the need to tell u guys about this addon (though most of u already know about it , so dont laugh @ me , i am very emotional haha)

Just install this addon and get the hard blocker counter for the final release https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/hard-blockers-counter/

Nice! How does it work? Does it have to be updated everyday to display the right counter numbers? Now's showing 36 blockers.

thanks.

.....

BTW, anyone knows if this "C" in the address bar is added by an addon or has landed in recent builds. All I know is that it wasn't there before. :)

C%20in%20addressbar.png

BTW, anyone knows if this "C" in the address bar is added by an addon or has landed in recent builds. All I know is that it wasn't there before. :)

C%20in%20addressbar.png

Try safemode first , u seem to use a theme too , try in safemode and see if its gone , if yes , then search the addon causing

http://arewefastyet.com/awfy2.php

Seems like firefox is close chrome v8 except from the v8 score but with firefox beta 11 I get a v8 score of 4204 while chrome v10 gets 8888.

But I guess the final firefox 4 will be faster than chrome because of directwrite etc

But once firefox reaches final I will probably switch to palemoon v4 which might hopefully keep it's pattern of being 25% faster.

I never save my tabs on closing. Is there at least an option to turn it off, even if it doesn't ask every time?

I'm not using a beta btw, only checking this forum occasionally, which is why I ask the question instead of checking myself.

Yes, there's an option to turn it off. The option mentioned previously controls it: you just set it to show your home page or a blank page on a new load of Firefox instead of stuff from last time.

I thought i upgraded to opera 11 installing ff 4 b11

Poor attempt at trolling? Just leave it out of this thread, okay?

  • Like 2

How do i make it to ask to save my tabs on exit(like in FF 3.6)??? browser.warnOnQuit is set to true,but after today's nightly it doesn't ask me anymore.How do i make it ask me to save on exit again?

"browser.showQuitWarning; true" is working again in Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:2.0b12pre) Gecko/20110209 Firefox/4.0b12pre build. Please check

...

But once firefox reaches final I will probably switch to palemoon v4 which might hopefully keep it's pattern of being 25% faster.

Reading up about palemoon, I don't see much of a point in it. The claims being made are pretty meaningless, and half of them are simply untrue.

Reading the "geek corner" section, it shows the guy is using an older compiler version than Mozilla is, and makes the point of saying he's doing PGO (Profile Guided Optimisations) on the build. PGO provides a good speed up, which is why Mozilla is already doing it.

It's nice, now if only they could put the link's url in there too instead of the address bar :wacko:

It's already like that in the nightlies.

I ended up putting links back in the url bar though since I kept looking in the wrong spot for them, heh.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!