Recommended Posts

Why can't I make the goddamn huge orange Firefox button into something that takes less space on my screen? :angry:

#appmenu-button {
  padding: 6px 8px !important;
  min-width: 0 !important;
}

#appmenu-button .button-text {   
  visibility: collapse !important;
}

#appmenu-button .button-menu-dropmarker { 
  margin: 0 !important; 
}

Putting this in userChrome.css gets rids of it completely:

#appmenu-button { display: none !important; }

To get its functions, press alt for the menu bar.

Not really a good long term option, tbh.

I've done similar to bogas04's code and reduced it to an icon (even though I have a wide screen, it still feels useful). My code is a little different though.

    #appmenu-button {
      padding: 2px 6px !important;
      min-width: 0 !important;
    }

    #appmenu-button .button-icon {
      list-style-image: url("chrome://branding/content/icon16.png");
    }

    #appmenu-button .button-text {
    visibility: collapse !important;
    }
    #appmenu-button .button-menu-dropmarker {
    margin: 0 !important;
    visibility: collapse !important;
    }

Any reason for that? Are some changes coming in that will make a difference?

I am wondering the same thing. If you ask me Mozilla should make the button movable, hideable, etc by default like Opera. Not trying to make this a argument though of which browser is better and so on. Just saying. Didn't even realize this was possible in Opera. It surprises me you can't do the same in Firefox without editing the userChrome.css or using a add-on. I finally realize what people have been talking about for so long. If you ask me if it wasn't for Firefox's free add-on system it would have no advantages. Now given that hopefully Mozilla makes this possible with the button in Firefox 4.1. I have faint they will.

Like I always said will always love Firefox and Opera the same that it is difficult to decide which one to use as my default at times. I basically go back and forth constantly.

Finally see why people asked Mozilla to include Thunderbird within Firefox too but hopefully that will never happen. Opera can somehow make their installer so small even with all the extra programs/features. No idea how but kudos to them! If it wasn't for them it wouldn't push Mozilla even more to create a better browser constantly!

New Download Manager TryBuilds are out!!

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/tryserver-builds/paolo.mozmail%40amadzone.org-278e7fd33e27/

Its really fantastic to see its already implemented before FF4 (although it WONT be there in it,probably)

79941579.png

New Download Manager TryBuilds are out!!

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/tryserver-builds/paolo.mozmail%40amadzone.org-278e7fd33e27/

Its really fantastic to see its already implemented before FF4 (although it WONT be there in it,probably)

79941579.png

it' so sad that ff4 won't be shipped with a proper download manager :(

it' so sad that ff4 won't be shipped with a proper download manager :(

i dont care , i would use nightlies what so ever :p Anyhow , there is a lot of pressure already , they cant get FF4 out properly, so its good to only hope that FF4 releases ASAP

FF4 is probably still a good 4-6 weeks away :sleep:

look at all the problems that still need fixing... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=556524,586314,589670,591687,593372,603793,604699,610526,613800,614347,616518,626016,626206,626602,626678,626909,627729,628651,628872,629227,629799,629909,630072,630690,630827,630835,630877,630932,630947,630957,631494,631733,632343,632379,632781,632844,632867,632923,632964,632969,633016,633383,633409,633511,633520,633622,633672

based on this i don't think they are rushing to get FF4 out the door because the number of bugs continues to go up. and on that list it needs to be zero before its released even.

New Download Manager TryBuilds are out!!

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/tryserver-builds/paolo.mozmail%40amadzone.org-278e7fd33e27/

Its really fantastic to see its already implemented before FF4 (although it WONT be there in it,probably)

79941579.png

Oops lol when I quoted the post the screen wasn't there xD

Looking good!

Oops lol when I quoted the post the screen wasn't there xD

Looking good!

I hope it still allows for a separate window to be opened like the current download manager. I like the ability to close the main browser window and still have the ability to continue downloads.

I hope it still allows for a separate window to be opened like the current download manager. I like the ability to close the main browser window and still have the ability to continue downloads.

Yep same here. That is what I do with the default firefox download manager and DownThemAll sometimes. That is if I ever close my browser.

The only thing I hate about the default firefox download manager is if you don't let it open while downloading and close the main browser window your download stops or pauses.

FF4 is probably still a good 4-6 weeks away :sleep:

look at all the problems that still need fixing... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_id=556524,586314,589670,591687,593372,603793,604699,610526,613800,614347,616518,626016,626206,626602,626678,626909,627729,628651,628872,629227,629799,629909,630072,630690,630827,630835,630877,630932,630947,630957,631494,631733,632343,632379,632781,632844,632867,632923,632964,632969,633016,633383,633409,633511,633520,633622,633672

based on this i don't think they are rushing to get FF4 out the door because the number of bugs continues to go up. and on that list it needs to be zero before its released even.

Your continued bitching is :sleep: . Why don't you install the nightlies and try to do something like finding bugs and helping the developers?

New Download Manager TryBuilds are out!!

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/tryserver-builds/paolo.mozmail%40amadzone.org-278e7fd33e27/

Its really fantastic to see its already implemented before FF4 (although it WONT be there in it,probably)

79941579.png

So, it won't make it to final? It would've been great if it did. but well... Firefox is getting polished really neatly and I can't complain.

What's wrong with the current one?

I've never had much of a problem with it, (Aside from Windows 7 requiring me to make 2 clicks to get to it every time now thanks to the icon grouping.) but apparently Mozilla thinks there's a few things that could be improved.

http://limi.net/articles/improving-download-behaviors-web-browsers/

Not really a good long term option, tbh.

I've done similar to bogas04's code and reduced it to an icon (even though I have a wide screen, it still feels useful). My code is a little different though.

    #appmenu-button {
      padding: 2px 6px !important;
      min-width: 0 !important;
    }

    #appmenu-button .button-icon {
      list-style-image: url("chrome://branding/content/icon16.png");
    }

    #appmenu-button .button-text {
    visibility: collapse !important;
    }
    #appmenu-button .button-menu-dropmarker {
    margin: 0 !important;
    visibility: collapse !important;
    }

I really like that a lot, but could someone give me the CSS to recolour the button? I've been digging through the CSS files and had no success.

Edit: And if anyone has a simple fix for making the minimize, maximize, and exit buttons translucent, that would be awesome, too.

Any reason for that? Are some changes coming in that will make a difference?

Nothing very specific, just that relying on the menu bar instead of the Firefox button isn't always going to work as the button is generally the thing superseding the menu bar.

Is there a way for firefox to open 'restore previous session' on the current window? I'm using ff4beta11.

What do you mean exactly? When you close and reopen the window, the default is that it'll open the set of tabs from last time - controlled by the Startup option on the General tab of Options. Otherwise, you have the restore tabs and restore windows options in the history menu?

What do you mean exactly? When you close and reopen the window, the default is that it'll open the set of tabs from last time - controlled by the Startup option on the General tab of Options. Otherwise, you have the restore tabs and restore windows options in the history menu?

He wants to restore the previous session in the same windows from the 'restore previous session' in the 'about:home' page

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "...a low price of just $340..." I don't think it means what you think it means.
    • This Corsair Vengeance DDR5-6000 32GB RAM with RGB is a great deal for limited time by Sayan Sen Memory prices have been through the roof for a while, though it seems like things might finally be getting better. If you are in the market for one, then grab this Corsair Vengeance DDR5 32GB (2x16GB) DDR5 6000 CL36 kit with RGB for a low price of just $340 (purchase link under the specs table down below). The kit is compatible with both AMD and Intel systems as it supports both EXPO and XMP overclocking profiles, respectively. 6000 MT/s is often the sweet spot for many systems as it provides ample data transfer speed while still being on Gear 1 mode. This Vengeance variant has RGB so if you love bright setups with such lighting, this is a win-win for you. The technical specifications of the Corsair Vengeance memory kit are given in the table below: Specification Value Memory Type DDR5 Memory Size (Total) 32GB Kit Configuration 2 × 16GB Form Factor UDIMM (Desktop) Pin Count 288-pin Speed (Data Rate) 6000 MT/s Speed Rating PC5-48000 Tested CAS Latency 38-44-44-96 Voltage (Tested) 1.35V Performance Profile AMD EXPO & Intel XMP Heat Spreader Aluminum heatspreader Cooling Type Passive (Heatsink) Lighting Ten Zone RGB Software Support Corsair iCUE Get it at the link below: CORSAIR Vengeance RGB DDR5 32GB (2 x 16GB) 6000 CL38 – Gray (CMH32GX5M1E6000Z38): $339.99 (Sold and Shipped by Woot US, Fulfilled by Amazon US) This Woot deal is US-specific and not available in other regions unless specified. This is a first-party seller link (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you also purchase from a first-party seller link only. If you don't like it or want to look at more options, check out the previous deals that we have covered, OR you can also visit Amazon US deals page. Get Prime (SNAP), Prime Video, Audible Plus or Kindle / Music Unlimited. Free for 30 days. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • The very fact that a TPM (v2.0 specifically which is part of the issue I suspect) is now a baseline for any supported Windows installation will naturally mean other vendors will start to leverage it as they know it'll be there. It's called progress, and it's always been the way. A TPM isn't a windows thing, it's just a module designed to securely store keys. Secure boot isn't a Windows thing (although MS are the TCA as I recall hence the upheaval this year as the 2011 certs expire), it's just a way to verify a bootloader is signed. Windows simply leverages them.
    • It's a local account with the ability to reset a password at a very base level. I really don't get the issue that gets whipped up around it But you do you
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      66
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!