Recommended Posts

There is another way to speed up firefox scrolling and rendering even more yourself but it is manually and a pain. It works though. It basically like seeing the future of Firefox 4.1 or 5 when each tab is a separate process like IE. Once this happens it will help Firefox a a ton! Just wish it was easier to do manually so it wasn't such a pain in the butt to do now. I don't mind waiting though sense I have a way around it if I really need to make it faster before it is put into firefox.

Having each tab as a separate process will end up using more memory and make it slightly slower than in-process tabs (Since you need to do the cross process talk, instead of being inside the process)

Crashes, bugs, slowdowns, etc.

One other disadvantage, is you get used to features months before they're in a release build, when I updated my PC from 3.5 to 3.6 I suddenly realised a whole bunch of stuff I was missing out on (vs. the "3.7" nightlies on my Mac)

What is mult-core support in a browser exactly and which ones have it ? What is the benefit ?

Increased UI responsiveness. When firefox is under load the UI often very noticeably lags (just becomes totally unresponsive for a second) even on my quadcore processor. With opera/chrome/ie9 I never see this happen.

Increased UI responsiveness. When firefox is under load the UI often very noticeably lags (just becomes totally unresponsive for a second) even on my quadcore processor. With opera/chrome/ie9 I never see this happen.

Yep I know exactly what your talking about. So Opera actually has mult-core support ? I didn't know this.

How long has this been a issue for Firefox because it has seem like it has gone on for a while. At least from what I have seen. I didn't start noticing it until a couple of years ago.

From mozilla.dev.planning

Team,

Looking at the hardblocker bug list and not counting blocklist bugs, we have 22 bugs without patches (out of 51 open) that remain to be fixed to get to RC.

This is it. It's time to do the final push to get Firefox 4 to release candidate.

I still see 91 non-blockers being fixed in the past seven days, and 84 actual blockers fixed. With 22 hardblockers remaining without patches, I believe it's time to do daily blocker driving on these few remaining items--triage the noms, review and push on each and every hard blocker, and give approvals the required attention to prevent regressions. We'll organize this today and announce in the engineering meeting. We can't afford to continue landing patches that risk significant regressions. It's churn we don't need.

Time to show fortitude. We've done it before, and we'll do it again. Let's finish these last few bugs and aim to finish RC by Feb 25th.

All my best,

Damon

http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.dev.planning/browse_thread/thread/00919e036759afac#

Firefox's UI has always been the least responsive for me, but the problem is greatly accentuated in fx 4 because of additions like tab animations that make any lag even more noticeable.

It has for me too but only after it has been running for about 4 to 8 hours depending on how many tabs I have open. The problem is most people never leave their browser open so they have no freaking idea what your talking about when you say Firefox slows down after a while. If you ask me it all has to do with memory usage. I noticed once Firefox.exe*32 process goes over 500 MB is when it becomes knowable the UI slowdown. At least for me. I could be wrong but it seems to always tell me when I can expect to see slowdowns. If I forgot to look at it and start to notice the ui reacting slowly sure enough I got to Task Manager and it is using over 500 MB of memory.

Now given this don't get me wrong. I don't care how much memory firefox uses. I have 8 GB of ram. The problem I have is when the ui starts to slow down because of the result of this. Thankfully I have figured out how to fix this issue for now until Firefox 4.1 comes out.

Can someone please reply to my post about the Bookmarks Menu bug? Here it is again. Anyone else notice that when you go to the bookmarks menu, then right click on a bookmark and say go to delete or properties, it like flickers? I'm guessing this is a bug. I think I noticed it in Beta 10 also, but not in Beta 9. I don't mean the bookmarks toolbar. That is smooth as can be and the way it should be. I mean when you go to the Bookmarks Menu next to History. It seems even the history menu flickers when you right click on stuff. I'm disabling add-ons to see if it's add-on related. So far no luck. Anyone know what I'm talking about?

While you're taking a risk using it as a main browser, I've been running the nightlies for a few months and I've not had a single crash/problem yet.

Well, I've been using the betas only, since about beta 5, and I've had plenty of crashes. It crashed on me today, even.

But, I am using firebug, which is in alpha right now, so that's likely part of the problem.

Can someone please reply to my post about the Bookmarks Menu bug? Here it is again. Anyone else notice that when you go to the bookmarks menu, then right click on a bookmark and say go to delete or properties, it like flickers? I'm guessing this is a bug. I think I noticed it in Beta 10 also, but not in Beta 9. I don't mean the bookmarks toolbar. That is smooth as can be and the way it should be. I mean when you go to the Bookmarks Menu next to History. It seems even the history menu flickers when you right click on stuff. I'm disabling add-ons to see if it's add-on related. So far no luck. Anyone know what I'm talking about?

Yes .. I see what you mean .. I get it here too!

It has for me too but only after it has been running for about 4 to 8 hours depending on how many tabs I have open. The problem is most people never leave their browser open so they have no freaking idea what your talking about when you say Firefox slows down after a while. If you ask me it all has to do with memory usage. I noticed once Firefox.exe*32 process goes over 500 MB is when it becomes knowable the UI slowdown. At least for me. I could be wrong but it seems to always tell me when I can expect to see slowdowns. If I forgot to look at it and start to notice the ui reacting slowly sure enough I got to Task Manager and it is using over 500 MB of memory.

Now given this don't get me wrong. I don't care how much memory firefox uses. I have 8 GB of ram. The problem I have is when the ui starts to slow down because of the result of this. Thankfully I have figured out how to fix this issue for now until Firefox 4.1 comes out.

I don't seem to notice it being any slower over time, for me its just slow from the get go (UI responsiveness, page loading is fine, what I am talking about it opening like a folder of bookmarks and seeing the whole UI totally stop, and jerky animations). Mem usage for me never really goes past 300 mb or so and I have plenty of free memory (4 gigs) opera uses more than firefox for me and always stays responsive.

Yes .. I see what you mean .. I get it here too!

Thank you for replying. I'm glad I'm not the only one. I hope that bug is fixed in Beta 12. It's just a minor annoyance, but it still would be nice to have it fixed. I'm glad they fixed the Panorama bug where the sites thumbnails didn't always load properly. Sometimes they would have an ugly white background. Beta 11 fixed that, so hopefully Beta 12 fixes the bookmark issues. Also, there's another small annoyance with the bookmarks menu. If you try dragging and dropping a bookmark from one position to another, it doesn't go where you want it to go. If you try moving it down, it goes to the top. I hope that is fixed as well. It doesn't seem to be doing it now, but it's happened before.

I don't seem to notice it being any slower over time, for me its just slow from the get go (UI responsiveness, page loading is fine, what I am talking about it opening like a folder of bookmarks and seeing the whole UI totally stop, and jerky animations). Mem usage for me never really goes past 300 mb or so and I have plenty of free memory (4 gigs) opera uses more than firefox for me and always stays responsive.

Ah I don't use bookmarks anymore. I use to but would never take the time to organize and the little time I tried I still couldn't ever find the one I wanted. Had way to many bookmarks I guess. Have an interesting question for you how many tabs do you usually have open and Firefox Add-ons installed?

Ah I don't use bookmarks anymore. I use to but would never take the time to organize and the little time I tried I still couldn't ever find the one I wanted. Had way to many bookmarks I guess. Have an interesting question for you how many tabs do you usually have open and Firefox Add-ons installed?

I'll generally have anywhere between 4-20 tabs open. Rarely a whole lot more than that unless I am researching something.

While you're taking a risk using it as a main browser, I've been running the nightlies for a few months and I've not had a single crash/problem yet.

i am talking about nightlies in general and not nightlies of present , i myself use nightlies and they haven't crashed on me since jan i guess , but i remember when D2D landed , it crashed too often , so that's what i am saying , its just prone to crashes

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think it depends on what you're looking for to do, and the time you have to spare. With my Dwarf 3, I easily spend 3-4 hour sessions; half an hour driving to an un-light polluted place, another half hour unpacking and setting up the smart scope + tripod for equatorial tracking, then 15 more minutes mucking around with settings and shooting calibration frames, spending a few hours shooting, merging with past photo sessions, etc. It's crazy how time flies and I often get home later than I expected. It's something I still need to set aside a good part of an evening to do, all in all. For one session, where you often need like four for best results when it comes to deep space objects. Even with a smart scope like Dwarf 3, regular non-astro photography is still way more approachable to people getting into photography. I find this is a time consuming niche no matter how I go about it. With practice, I can probably begin cutting time here but I think where smart scopes find their home is among people who love to shoot the night sky but don't have the spare time to go deep with the "navigator level" attunement to the night sky itself in addition to everything else. Having said this, _if_ you have even more time to spend on this hobby, it will probably be even more rewarding to do it more by hand and learn the skies and the details of how it all works.
    • I misread the title and thought Teams itself would be redesigned. Imagine having this one as a native WinUI app.
    • Dell, HP PCs ran into endless reboot, BitLocker recovery loops but Windows 11 isn't to blame by Sayan Sen Last month Neowin reported on a major issue on Dell systems wherein a bug in its official support tool was leading to endless blue screen of death (BSOD) and restarts. Following our report, Dell officially acknowledged its SupportAssist-related crash issue, confirming that the culprit is not Microsoft's operating system but rather a faulty version of its own remediation software. In a newly published support advisory, Dell stated that version 5.5.16.0 of Dell SupportAssist Remediation and Alienware SupportAssist Remediation can trigger blue screen errors and unexpected system restarts. The company notes that the problematic component operates independently of the main SupportAssist application, meaning users should not remove the primary SupportAssist software when troubleshooting the issue. According to Dell, the crashes are linked specifically to the SupportAssist Remediation service, which is bundled with SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools, and as such it has since released an updated version, 5.5.16.1, which is said to resolve the problem. Affected users are advised to first verify whether version 5.5.16.0 is installed by checking the Installed Apps section in Windows Settings. If so, Dell recommends updating SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools through either SupportAssist's "Update Software" feature or Dell Command Update. Dell also advises users to back up important data before performing the update and to ensure systems remain connected to power throughout the installation process. If you are still having issues though make sure to report to the Dell support forum. As it turns out though Dell is not the only PC maker currently dealing with update-related headaches as HP is also facing a separate but probably equally frustrating issue involving recent Windows Secure Boot updates that were released with recent Windows 11 Patch Tuesdays. Similar to Dell, HP also put up its own support article where it explains the issue. The company says that affected devices could hit a brick wall when booting as they run into a BitLocker recovery loop after the April 2026 updates. The problem appears to affect systems wherein the new UEFI Secure Boot CA 2023 certificates fail to apply properly. As such affected users will find themselves entering their recovery key over and over again despite the system otherwise functioning normally. HP says such PCs should be updated to the latest available BIOS version and configured with the necessary Secure Boot certificates before installing Microsoft's Windows 11 Patch Tuesday updates. Systems that are already experiencing the problem may require BIOS configuration changes to restore normal boot behavior. Admins can find information regarding that in the support article here on HP's official website.
    • Getting further away from the artistic study of mental disease that was the first game... (which never needed any sequels to begin with) But I get it, a company has to make money. And the second was at least visually impressive, if not in any other way.
    • If its the devs fault you would think Unreal would help M$ take full advantage of Unreal and work with them to fix the performance issues. Otherwise they are catching unwarranted bad press.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      246
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!