Recommended Posts

Stylish not working... I'm on the 4.0 beta 2 nightly as mine says... Why is it Beta 2... When the Menu is still not working! I'm annoyed at having to use the menu to update or change big settings since the new menu is too small and lacks everything.

Because ... it's a beta build. And not even a public beta.

Well I thought I'd try the beta 1 to have a look , and sadly I have to say I'm not impressed at all.

Just my opinion of course .. and I realise it's a beta .. but this can't be near a public release surely ...

It's not, tbh. There's still a couple of months to go.

That's a candidate build, might not end up being the "final" beta.

that's right. if you read the following:

https://wiki.mozilla.org/Releases/Firefox_4.0b1

there could be a 2nd candidate build of Firefox 4.0 beta 1 coming very soon.

Yes 3.7 is skipped as it has been renamed as 4.0 now. Beta 1 will likely be out within 2 weeks.

yup. AND the gecko version number of candidate build 1 of FF4b1 is now 2.0b1 instead of 1.9.3b1.

they've also renamed the gecko version number of the 4.0b2pre nightlies as well (to rv:2.0b2pre).

no more gecko 1.9.3.x.

app tabs are so wide O.o is there a way to fix this?

The same thing happens with me and FaviconizeTab, it's rather annoying :(

I've made my tabs a little smaller, but I still want FaviconizeTab to work, or a similar addon that works.

capturefx.png

wth is taking so damn long? Jesus, take a hint from the Chrome guys and start rolling out the updates, they are dragging their feet with this release aren't they?

not really, they're completely redesigning the UI and this is their first experience going into the titlebar

there's a lot of reprogramming to be done and a lot of mistakes to be learned from and bugs to fix

i'd say their rate of progression is reasonable for what their doing

wth is taking so damn long? Jesus, take a hint from the Chrome guys and start rolling out the updates, they are dragging their feet with this release aren't they?

I agree.

The UI itself should not be taking this long, and in reality should have been completed to the standard of the mockups a long time ago.

  • Like 1

I agree.

The UI itself should not be taking this long, and in reality should have been completed to the standard of the mockups a long time ago.

Yup, especially considering what you managed to do laugh.gif

  • Like 1

How do you get app tabs in 4.0 beta 1?

i don't think it's truly implemented yet

i think people are just using an extension atm

I agree.

The UI itself should not be taking this long, and in reality should have been completed to the standard of the mockups a long time ago.

if you think it's so easy why don't you do it yourself

it's not as easy as you think, with every little thing that they change brings the possibility of a bug or and issue that they'll then have to fix, it's a long and grueling process of much trial and error

Yup, especially considering what you managed to do laugh.gif

Thanks! :D

i don't think it's truly implemented yet

i think people are just using an extension atm

if you think it's so easy why don't you do it yourself

it's not as easy as you think, with every little thing that they change brings the possibility of a bug or and issue that they'll then have to fix, it's a long and grueling process of much trial and error

I'm talking about the theme itself, and if you think I'm not familiar with the process you're mistaken.

(Y) And the new titlebar design shouldn't be used as an excuse, look at how quickly Opera inplemented their design.....

Yup, and what's taking them so long to implement the options within the menu is also beyond me. SoapyHamHocks can add an option to one of our menus in seconds if needed.

  • Like 1

Yup, and what's taking them so long to implement the options within the menu is also beyond me. SoapyHamHocks can add an option to one of our menus in seconds if needed.

Perhaps they don't want to do it fast, they want to do it right. Sounds clich?, but quite likely true.

Perhaps they don't want to do it fast, they want to do it right. Sounds clich?, but quite likely true.

exactly what i was trying to say, better to take your time and do things right then throw it together quickly and have tons of bugs

exactly what i was trying to say, better to take your time and do things right then throw it together quickly and have tons of bugs

I understand your opinion, but because of BoneyardBrew and SoapyHamHocks, there isn't too much of an incentive for me to move to a less stable Firefox pre-beta, when my 3.6.6 looks almost exactly like these current builds.

exactly what i was trying to say, better to take your time and do things right then throw it together quickly and have tons of bugs

There are not tons of bugs. The remaining bugs are few and do not effect stability. The Public Beta should be out tonight or tomorrow.

There are not tons of bugs. The remaining bugs are few and do not effect stability. The Public Beta should be out tonight or tomorrow.

He saying that if they did try and rush development there would be lots of bugs. Not that there are currently.

FWIW, there are a fair number of bugs/issues in beta 1, but few are major. (This is me managing expectations)

I don't even think the current Firefox menu is staying, I think they're going for a Office style split menu.

I personally wouldn't like a Chrome style update system, Chrome gets features rushed out that can then break (like WebSockets, the spec changed in a breaking way, so the current Chrome release can't talk to servers implementing the current spec, which is needed for Firefox 4 and dev builds of Chrome)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!