• 0

[solved] CSS a:hover li


Question

I'm a bit confused and I need some help please.

I have the feeling this code is wrong but I'm not sure how to fix it.

Basically the <li> are graphical buttons, and the whole <li> block should be linked and the hover effect should work.

It works in Chrome and Opera but not in Firefox.

Any help appreciated :)

#menu-top ul {
 float:left;
 padding:0;
 margin:0;
 background:url(images/menu-top-separator.png) no-repeat center right;
}
#menu-top li {
 float:left;
 list-style:none;
 width:120px;
 height:50px;
 background:url(images/menu-top-titles.png) no-repeat 0 0;
}

#menu-top li.one { background-position:center 0px; }
#menu-top li.two { background-position:center -50px; }
#menu-top li.three { background-position:center -150px; }
#menu-top li.four { background-position:center -200px; }

#menu-top a:hover li.one { background-position:center -250px; }
#menu-top a:hover li.two { background-position:center -300px; }
#menu-top a:hover li.three { background-position:center -400px; }
#menu-top a:hover li.four { background-position:center -450px; }

&lt;div id="menu-top"&gt;
        &lt;ul&gt;&lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;li class="one"&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;ul&gt;&lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;li class="two"&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;ul&gt;&lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;li class="three"&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;a href="#"&gt;&lt;li class="four"&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/911256-solved-css-ahover-li/
Share on other sites

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

&lt;div id="menu-top"&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li class="one"&gt;&lt;a href="#"&gt;One&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li class="two"&gt;&lt;a href="#"&gt;Two&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li class="three"&gt;&lt;a href="#"&gt;Three&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

If you want the list items to hover individually, apply the hover to the list item. If you want the entire list to hover, apply the hover to the div or the unordered list.

  • 0

Thanks :)

New working code:

#menu-top ul {
 margin:0;
 padding:0;
 list-style:none;
}
#menu-top li {
 float:left;
 background:url(images/menu-top-separator.png) no-repeat center right;
}
#menu-top a {
 float:left;
 width:120px;
 height:50px;
 text-decoration:none;
 background:url(images/menu-top-titles.png) no-repeat 0 0;
}

#menu-top a.one { background-position:center 0px; }
#menu-top a.two { background-position:center -50px; }
#menu-top a.three { background-position:center -150px; }
#menu-top a.four { background-position:center -200px; }

#menu-top a:hover.one { background-position:center -250px; }
#menu-top a:hover.two { background-position:center -300px; }
#menu-top a:hover.three { background-position:center -400px; }
#menu-top a:hover.four { background-position:center -450px; }

        &lt;div id="menu-top"&gt;
            &lt;ul&gt;
                &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#1" class="one"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
                &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#2" class="two"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
                &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#3" class="three"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
                &lt;a href="#4" class="four"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
            &lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;

  • 0

For accessibility, you're better off putting some text inside the link. Screen readers won't know what your links are for without a link label and when you disable CSS and JavaScript, your HTML should still provide enough information to use the website in some way. And if that doesn't convince you: it makes your HTML more "semantic". :)

You can always hide the text through CSS and use the background image instead. This method is known as image replacement and can work as followed:

#menu-top a {
 float:left;
 width:120px;
 height:50px;
 text-decoration:none;
 background:url(images/menu-top-titles.png) no-repeat 0 0;
 text-indent: -9999px;
}

And then just put a useful label for your links

&lt;div id="menu-top"&gt;
   &lt;ul&gt;
      &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#1" class="one"&gt;First link label&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
   &lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;

By using text-indent with a high negative value, you're pushing the text out of the viewable area, effectively hiding it for the user. However, screen readers can still read the link label and the label will show just fine when CSS is disabled. There are other ways to do this, but this is by far the most commonly used (and in my opinion the best) way to do it.

  • 0

        &lt;div id="menu-top"&gt;
            &lt;ul&gt;
                &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#1" class="one"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
                &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#2" class="two"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
                &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#3" class="three"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
                &lt;a href="#4" class="four"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
            &lt;/ul&gt;
        &lt;/div&gt;

Why have you placed a non-list-item inside an unordered list tag?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      595
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!