Recommended Posts

The lurker thing worries me tbh.. I'd rather that frequent "guests" register. But I don't know why they don't! We always have a much higher amount of guests than logged in members in the forums :/

Everybody has their reasons. I think shyness plays a large role in why people don't though. They don't want to look like a fool when they ask a question that might be stupid, or they are trying to learn from reading already established posts. Neowin is a great community, but we're also a great resource of information. I also have to admit, sometimes when people ask a simple question, we sometimes get members pointing out how they should already know this information, or to google it. I know I used to occasionally pull that attitude, but now I'd rather just help out from the get-go. It's better on people's self-esteem, it helps them out, and it makes the community look more inviting.

I figure if we try to make these little efforts, then we'll attract more people and make the community grow even more.

  • Like 2

The lurker thing worries me tbh.. I'd rather that frequent "guests" register. But I don't know why they don't! We always have a much higher amount of guests than logged in members in the forums :/

The situation is similar on other forums. As previous poster said, many people visit forum just to read already answered questions.

Everybody has their reasons. I think shyness plays a large role in why people don't though. They don't want to look like a fool when they ask a question that might be stupid, or they are trying to learn from reading already established posts. Neowin is a great community, but we're also a great resource of information. I also have to admit, sometimes when people ask a simple question, we sometimes get members pointing out how they should already know this information, or to google it. I know I used to occasionally pull that attitude, but now I'd rather just help out from the get-go. It's better on people's self-esteem, it helps them out, and it makes the community look more inviting.

I figure if we try to make these little efforts, then we'll attract more people and make the community grow even more.

Seconded. Helping people instead of yelling 'JFGI!' is the key to attracting more members.

I personally do not care for even one of the features Neowin gives me by subscribing. I just did it cause I've been reading tech news here for years and I like the way it has been evolving, I'd like too see more news and important information on products, but it can't have everything.

You have almost 7000 posts on this forum and you feel you don't need to support it even a little bit? Who cares about what you get for subscribing. It's supporting a forum that you post on quite regularly. Such a weird attitude to take. :wacko:

Just IMO, but I have thousands of posts and I support the site by visiting, giving them increased money for ad banners. I'm not going to pay money to support every single site I visit. For those that do subscribe, kudos.

It's a very good idea to always read through a tread if you are going to post in it because the situation have changed on page 13. To quote what I said on page 13:

So indirectly making this thread, I made people subscribe lol. :D

After so many people say they subscribe to support, I'm inclind to include myself as well. On this thursday, I might subscribe to the first tier.

Neowin has been a great support forum for me. I have been visiting this forum everyday and I did mean everyday. Every time I get on my computer every morning I click on my Neowin forums bookmark link and read new stuff. I have posted for help and have received help. After some people here noticed that I am "one-sided minded", I decided to "grow up" and give back what I benefit so much since 2003 (when I signed up). *Me waits for Thursday.*

I bought my subscription before posting my first post. The reason I bought it is because I do not like viewing advertisements that much so I do not mind supporting the site by paying for a subscription which allows these to be removed. I also do like some of the other perks as they can be useful. I have yet to start a blog but I am not one to blog, I just prefer to read through them. I do not think anything needs to be added to the subscription packages either as they are pretty decent for the price, I have been on several forum which charge $11-16 dollars a month [never mind for a year] for a premium package and you got hardly anything for it. Overall I think the subscriptions here at neowin are excellent and they are not forced upon the members.

You have almost 7000 posts on this forum and you feel you don't need to support it even a little bit?

I'd be the same. I wouldn't subscribe unless there was a worthwhile benefit.

Members who have been here for a long time shouldn't feel pressured to contribute.

Everybody has their reasons. I think shyness plays a large role in why people don't though. They don't want to look like a fool when they ask a question that might be stupid, or they are trying to learn from reading already established posts. Neowin is a great community, but we're also a great resource of information. I also have to admit, sometimes when people ask a simple question, we sometimes get members pointing out how they should already know this information, or to google it. I know I used to occasionally pull that attitude, but now I'd rather just help out from the get-go. It's better on people's self-esteem, it helps them out, and it makes the community look more inviting.

I figure if we try to make these little efforts, then we'll attract more people and make the community grow even more.

+1 It took me quite a while to even register. Shyness is probably the no. 1 reason why I don't post a lot.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!