Phenom II Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 See just how well FINAL FANTASY XIV will run on your computer. This official benchmark software uses actual maps and characters to assign a score to your PC and rate its performance. [8000 and over] Extremely High Performance Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. [5500–7999] Very High Performance Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions. [4500-5499] High Performance Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions. [3000-4499] Fairly High Performance Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance. [2500-2999] Standard Performance Capable of running the game on default settings. [2000-2499] Slightly Low Performance Capable of running the game, but may experience some slowdown. Adjust settings to improve performance. [1500-1999] Low Performance Capable of running the game, but will experience considerable slowdown. Adjusting settings is unlikely to improve performance. [under 1500] Insufficient Performance Does not meet specifications for running the game. http://www.finalfant...na/index.html#2 My results High Settings Low Settings Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazure Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 Ok, so you got like, a modern and powerful ATI card, one of the highest end AMD cpus, and good RAM on top of that... and to play on decent graphic settings.. barely meets 'standard' performance requirements? Talk about mega ouch. Does this game top out at a locked 30 FPS like FF11 did? And does this one, like FF11, also ignore your video card for the most part? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZakO Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 On low I only got Score: 3538, Load Time 13242ms with a GTX 260 and Q9550, I've got loads of stuff running in the background though (VMs). Will try high later. What character did you use? Does it render the scene from a completely different perspective depending on the character? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phenom II Posted June 20, 2010 Author Share Posted June 20, 2010 Ok, so you got like, a modern and powerful ATI card, one of the highest end AMD cpus, and good RAM on top of that... and to play on decent graphic settings.. barely meets 'standard' performance requirements? Talk about mega ouch. Does this game top out at a locked 30 FPS like FF11 did? And does this one, like FF11, also ignore your video card for the most part? Yea tell me about it, Im not sure about the FPS lock, the benchmark doesnt show FPS, and I dont have fraps installed, but I noticed my CPU temp increase significantly during the benchmarking On low I only got Score: 3538, Load Time 13242ms with a GTX 260 and Q9550, I've got loads of stuff running in the background though (VMs). Will try high later. What character did you use? Does it render the scene from a completely different perspective depending on the character? I just used the top male character, but the scene was first in a room with other people walking round, then he walks up some misty stairs and there is a flash and he is on a ship fighting flying jellyfish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Hammond Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 2029 in Low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToneKnee Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 4428 on low. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lazure Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 Note that none of these machines are overclocked, except for the 8600 GTS in my desktop (and it's a factory overclock). Scores on High, female Hyur picked each time: Desktop: 339 - 20869ms Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Core 2 duo E6400 @ 2.13ghz, Nvidia 8600 GTS Laptop: 1069 - 13883ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i5 M 430 @ 2.27ghz, Nvidia GTS 360M Friend's system: 2528 - 17235ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i7 860 @ 2.8ghz, ATI Radeon 5770 Scores on Low, Miqo'te picked each time: Desktop: 962 - 16545ms Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Core 2 duo E6400 @ 2.13ghz, Nvidia 8600 GTS Laptop: 1955 - 13437ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i5 M 430 @ 2.27ghz, Nvidia GTS 360M Friend's system: 4546 - 17443ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i7 860 @ 2.8ghz, ATI Radeon 5770 I could not play this game even on LOW and still get 'standard performance' on my own desktop or laptop. I would definitely need a new desktop machine to do this game. That's very ouch. This game is the new Crysis. Luckily, MMOs aren't really top on my priority list right now, so I wouldn't have to worry too much about this problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farchord Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 2314 lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyDX Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 2344 High (1920x1080) with Miqo'te CPU: AMD Phenom I x4 9850 Black Edition @ 2.5ghz GFX: XFX Radeon 5770HD 1GB RAM: 3GB @ 800mhz OS: Win7 Not the highest number but seemed fluid for me :blink: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emn1ty Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 If these numbers are right, this MMO is gonna lock out most who want to play it. Still, the game looks ridiculously good even on Low settings and high setting seemed to net me only some minor drops in frame rate despite scoring only 1024 in high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kazuyette Posted June 20, 2010 Share Posted June 20, 2010 1930 on my laptop ( Q9000 / GF9800M GTS 1GO ) with the character set on random. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackhearted Posted June 25, 2010 Share Posted June 25, 2010 3207 for me. Seemed nice and smooth. Only ran it on the low res though, as my monitor doesn't do 1920x1080 and as such performance in that res doesn't matter to me. The resolution is the only difference between the settings anyway. Aside from that they're both the same detail settings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xerxes Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 Considering the age of my desktop, it got what I thought was a reasonable score and it ran pretty smooth too: High Score: 2,015 Load Time: 14,269ms Low Score: 2,641 Load Time: 14,899ms Machine CPU: Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66Ghz GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 260 OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PixilEyes Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 How much market share if any do you guys think it will take away from wow? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sethos Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 How much market share if any do you guys think it will take away from wow? None :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajputwarrior Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 How much market share if any do you guys think it will take away from wow? None :laugh: (Y) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Haptic Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 We need someone with some really high end computer to see if getting over 8000 is even possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kondrath Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 What the heck. When I read the first post, I thought "Psh, no problem. My PC will get OVER 9000"... -___- Score on High settings - 2228 Load - 16517ms I've never heard my video card get so loud before. What in the heck kind of computer do I need to play this thing smoothly!? xD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 How much market share if any do you guys think it will take away from wow? Personally I don't think anything major really. I got an alpha invite but the phase ended before I could get up to date with the horrendously slow downloader/patcher - I think it's bittorrent based but without wow's HTTP fallback. Plus, Cataclysm is looking REALLY good. Anyway, my comp got 4803 - this benchmark is really bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kondrath Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 ^ same here. The download was so slow. Once it finished, my HDD crashed and then the phase was over. Apparently they just had another one a week ago or so, but I didn't know about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joseph B Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 Everytime someone says, "LOL THEY WILL NEVER TAKE AWAY WOWS PLAYERZ" I love it, because WE DON'T WANT WOWS PLAYERS. JUST STAY AWAY. The less of you foaming mouthbreathers there are, the better for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Argi Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 Everytime someone says, "LOL THEY WILL NEVER TAKE AWAY WOWS PLAYERZ" I love it, because WE DON'T WANT WOWS PLAYERS. JUST STAY AWAY. The less of you foaming mouthbreathers there are, the better for us. I assume the game's going to have a monthly fee? They kinda do want people playing [and paying for] their game, unless they want to end up in the sea of failed MMOs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rajputwarrior Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 Everytime someone says, "LOL THEY WILL NEVER TAKE AWAY WOWS PLAYERZ" I love it, because WE DON'T WANT WOWS PLAYERS. JUST STAY AWAY. The less of you foaming mouthbreathers there are, the better for us. isn't FFXI plagued with bugs? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farchord Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 isn't FFXI plagued with bugs? Where in hell, if I may ask, did you get that idea? WoW has more bugs than FFXI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Elessar Posted June 27, 2010 Share Posted June 27, 2010 Only 2GB of RAM...would like to upgrade to 4GB sometime in the future but I haven't seen any good deals lately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts