Final Fantasy XIV Official Benchmark


Recommended Posts

captureko.png

See just how well FINAL FANTASY XIV will run on your computer.

This official benchmark software uses actual maps and characters to assign a score to your PC and rate its performance.

[8000 and over] Extremely High Performance

Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings.

[5500–7999] Very High Performance

Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.

[4500-5499] High Performance

Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions.

[3000-4499] Fairly High Performance

Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance.

[2500-2999] Standard Performance

Capable of running the game on default settings.

[2000-2499] Slightly Low Performance

Capable of running the game, but may experience some slowdown. Adjust settings to improve performance.

[1500-1999] Low Performance

Capable of running the game, but will experience considerable slowdown. Adjusting settings is unlikely to improve performance.

[under 1500] Insufficient Performance

Does not meet specifications for running the game.

http://www.finalfant...na/index.html#2

My results

High Settings

captureain.png

Low Settings

capture4d.png

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/912436-final-fantasy-xiv-official-benchmark/
Share on other sites

Ok, so you got like, a modern and powerful ATI card, one of the highest end AMD cpus, and good RAM on top of that... and to play on decent graphic settings.. barely meets 'standard' performance requirements? Talk about mega ouch.

Does this game top out at a locked 30 FPS like FF11 did? And does this one, like FF11, also ignore your video card for the most part?

On low I only got Score: 3538, Load Time 13242ms with a GTX 260 and Q9550, I've got loads of stuff running in the background though (VMs). Will try high later.

What character did you use? Does it render the scene from a completely different perspective depending on the character?

Ok, so you got like, a modern and powerful ATI card, one of the highest end AMD cpus, and good RAM on top of that... and to play on decent graphic settings.. barely meets 'standard' performance requirements? Talk about mega ouch.

Does this game top out at a locked 30 FPS like FF11 did? And does this one, like FF11, also ignore your video card for the most part?

Yea tell me about it, Im not sure about the FPS lock, the benchmark doesnt show FPS, and I dont have fraps installed, but I noticed my CPU temp increase significantly during the benchmarking

On low I only got Score: 3538, Load Time 13242ms with a GTX 260 and Q9550, I've got loads of stuff running in the background though (VMs). Will try high later.

What character did you use? Does it render the scene from a completely different perspective depending on the character?

I just used the top male character, but the scene was first in a room with other people walking round, then he walks up some misty stairs and there is a flash and he is on a ship fighting flying jellyfish

Note that none of these machines are overclocked, except for the 8600 GTS in my desktop (and it's a factory overclock).

Scores on High, female Hyur picked each time:

Desktop: 339 - 20869ms Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Core 2 duo E6400 @ 2.13ghz, Nvidia 8600 GTS

Laptop: 1069 - 13883ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i5 M 430 @ 2.27ghz, Nvidia GTS 360M

Friend's system: 2528 - 17235ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i7 860 @ 2.8ghz, ATI Radeon 5770

Scores on Low, Miqo'te picked each time:

Desktop: 962 - 16545ms Windows 7 Pro 64-bit, Core 2 duo E6400 @ 2.13ghz, Nvidia 8600 GTS

Laptop: 1955 - 13437ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i5 M 430 @ 2.27ghz, Nvidia GTS 360M

Friend's system: 4546 - 17443ms Windows 7 HP 64-bit, Core i7 860 @ 2.8ghz, ATI Radeon 5770

I could not play this game even on LOW and still get 'standard performance' on my own desktop or laptop. I would definitely need a new desktop machine to do this game. That's very ouch. This game is the new Crysis. Luckily, MMOs aren't really top on my priority list right now, so I wouldn't have to worry too much about this problem.

If these numbers are right, this MMO is gonna lock out most who want to play it. Still, the game looks ridiculously good even on Low settings and high setting seemed to net me only some minor drops in frame rate despite scoring only 1024 in high.

3207 for me. Seemed nice and smooth. Only ran it on the low res though, as my monitor doesn't do 1920x1080 and as such performance in that res doesn't matter to me.

The resolution is the only difference between the settings anyway. Aside from that they're both the same detail settings.

Considering the age of my desktop, it got what I thought was a reasonable score and it ran pretty smooth too:

High

Score: 2,015

Load Time: 14,269ms

Low

Score: 2,641

Load Time: 14,899ms

Machine

CPU: Core 2 Duo E6700 @ 2.66Ghz

GPU: Nvidia GeForce GTX 260

OS: Windows 7 Ultimate x64

What the heck. When I read the first post, I thought "Psh, no problem. My PC will get OVER 9000"...

-___-

Score on High settings - 2228

Load - 16517ms

I've never heard my video card get so loud before. What in the heck kind of computer do I need to play this thing smoothly!? xD

How much market share if any do you guys think it will take away from wow?

Personally I don't think anything major really. I got an alpha invite but the phase ended before I could get up to date with the horrendously slow downloader/patcher - I think it's bittorrent based but without wow's HTTP fallback. Plus, Cataclysm is looking REALLY good.

Anyway, my comp got 4803 - this benchmark is really bad.

Everytime someone says, "LOL THEY WILL NEVER TAKE AWAY WOWS PLAYERZ" I love it, because WE DON'T WANT WOWS PLAYERS. JUST STAY AWAY.

The less of you foaming mouthbreathers there are, the better for us.

I assume the game's going to have a monthly fee? They kinda do want people playing [and paying for] their game, unless they want to end up in the sea of failed MMOs.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!