Final Fantasy XIV Official Benchmark


Recommended Posts

Where in hell, if I may ask, did you get that idea?

WoW has more bugs than FFXI.

from people playing it? slow servers, slow updates for patches, retardedly huge learning curve, not many people really playing anymore etc etc

i don't know for a fact, i've hated every RPG i've come across but i did try WoW (hated it with a ****ing passion...) and gave FF XI a try cause i love the FF series but that game was slow downloading updates, and didn'thave the patience to learn it.

I bet those who say the benchmark is bad cause of a score that's not "over 9000!" are only saying it's bad cause they expect wow-like super high performance from a game that will actually put some stress on their hardware(unlike wow)...

How much market share if any do you guys think it will take away from wow?

If cata is as bad, and as much of a turn off from the game as it sounds like it's gonna be, then it'll score plenty.

And before someone says it: it's not just me who feels that way either. Quite a few people i know who play, of have played in the past, think cata sounds terrible.

from people playing it? slow servers, slow updates for patches, retardedly huge learning curve, not many people really playing anymore etc etc

I think you forgot what the term 'bug' means. As none of the things you listed have anything to do with any possible bugs in the game itself. And thus are not an answer to why you thought the game was 'plagued with bugs'.

I bet those who say the benchmark is bad cause of a score that's not "over 9000!" are only saying it's bad cause they expect wow-like super high performance from a game that will actually put some stress on their hardware(unlike wow)...

Well, I honestly hope the benchmark is screwed up. If you take a look at our specs, they're really decent machines. It's weird how we're getting such awful scores. I hope this isn't the next Crysis, lol. My 4870 is borderline unplayable.

edit: Why is this in Overclocking and PC modding? xD

Well, I honestly hope the benchmark is screwed up. If you take a look at our specs, they're really decent machines. It's weird how we're getting such awful scores. I hope this isn't the next Crysis, lol. My 4870 is borderline unplayable.

edit: Why is this in Overclocking and PC modding? xD

Because the FFXIV benchmark is so horribly unoptimized, that you practically NEED a heavily overclocked, liquid cooled state of the art modern day i7 980X at around 5ghz or more with quad GTX 480's just to score higher than 5000 on this damn benchmark, and even then you're still nowhere near the highest the benchmark says you can go.

PS2 emulation is faster than this thing!

CPU: Intel Core 2 Quad q9550 @ 3.30 ghz

RAM: 4gb OCZ DDR2 @ 1170mhz

video card: XFX ATI 5770 oc'ed @ 930mhz GPU / 1250mhz Memory

sound card: Creative Labs Sound Blaster X-FI Titanium FATAL1TY PCI-E

on low w/Roegadyn (monitor won't do the high resolution) just over 4500. don't remember exactly the thing restarted before i took a good luck at it. Looked awesome, ran pretty good. i really want to play this game now.

Similar system as the OP.

I bet those who say the benchmark is bad cause of a score that's not "over 9000!" are only saying it's bad cause they expect wow-like super high performance from a game that will actually put some stress on their hardware(unlike wow)...

Are you kidding? WoW wrecks the CPU in 25 man raids, and the GPU if you bump all the graphics up. Catacylsm looks AMAZING from what's been shown - they've really bumped up the texture resolution while preserving the overall feel of things.

  • 2 weeks later...

Well, heres my benchmarks.

2756 on low

1448 on high

Both were smooth as hell, but I doubt we'll see any further engine optimisation.

iMac 27"

Core i7 2.80GHz

8GB of RAM

ATi 4850

Downloading the full client from Square now :)

post-180771-12790146692087.jpg

post-180771-12790146796752.jpg

  • 1 month later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      535
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!