Ars reviews the HTC EVO 4G


Recommended Posts

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/reviews/2010/06/hands-on-ars-reviews-the-htc-evo-4g.ars

The HTC EVO 4G is arguably one of the most ambitious smartphones ever to ship with Google's Android mobile operating system. Exclusive to Sprint, the device is one of the first to deliver 4G network connectivity. Its appeal is boosted by impressive hardware specs and a roster of outstanding capabilities, like support for high-definition video capture. It comes loaded with HTC's unique user interface enhancements and custom applications, which round out its feature set nicely.

Despite its strong assortment of merits, the device falls short of greatness due to mediocre battery life and a handful of other limitations. In this review, we'll take a close hands-on look at the EVO 4G.

It appears that those who have been trumpeting it as the second coming of the big JC have been sorely mistaken when the rubber hits the road and a real examination takes place. I wonder where all those EVO devotee's are now who spam iPhone 4 news articles proclaiming that "iPhone 4 sucks, I'm going to get an EVO"? seems to be rather quiet on the western front at the moment that such a comprehensive review slides under the radar as the iPhone bash-a-thon starts by those occupying the cheap seats.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/913784-ars-reviews-the-htc-evo-4g/
Share on other sites

I don't understand this bit:

The EVO's high-end specs, excellent performance, and top-notch feature lineup are exciting, but the poor battery life sadly diminishes the value of the product. Some of the EVO's most compelling differentiators—such as the large screen, 4G connectivity, and WiFi tethering—are not consistently useful in practice and come with caveats and detrimental trade-offs.

The battery life is better than the 3GS, and while people didn't like that either they didn't claim it ruined the product. Not to mention, you can buy an extended battery and replace it.

They also say that 4g is a major battery drain, so just disable it and use 3g which is still decently fast. You want the extra speed, you take the extra battery hit. Simple. Nor do I understand how WiFi tethering isn't useful and comes with a detrimental trade-off. If you don't want to use it, don't use it. You don't have to have it on all the time, everywhere you go so if you want to use it turn it on. Try running the iPhone with WiFi and 3g radio always on and you'll see the battery takes a hit because of it.

Finally the large screen. Yes it does take some time to get used to but once that is done you can use the phone with 1 hand. I have an HD2 and the only things I use more than 1 hand for is multitouch and typing in something. This has seriously got to be the first review that I've seen that criticizes a 4.3" screen; not even the hd2 reviews complained about it. Everyone has agreed that the huge screen is fantastic.

It's clear that smartphone makers still haven't found the sweet spot for large form-factor handheld devices. Simply increasing the size of the screen is not a recipe for building a better phone. The handset makers need to adopt higher resolutions for large displays so that the additional physical space consumed by the screen will actually translate into extra viewable area.

That has to be my favorite bit. When other phones had WVGA and the iPhone only had HVGA (?), everyone said it was no big deal and that nobody needs such a high resolution anyways.

Now that the iPhone 4g has a 960x640 resolution (more than WVGA), everyones like oh well WVGA is old you need more.

The 4G connectivity is a non-starter for me because it isn't widely available yet and it saps the battery much too fast. It really doesn't add anything to the phone.

Yes faster browsing speed doesn't really add anything to the phone. I wonder why we're coming out with LTE next year with a theoretical 100mbps speed then. Nobody needs it :rolleyes:

  • Like 3

The battery life is better than the 3GS, and while people didn't like that either they didn't claim it ruined the product. Not to mention, you can buy an extended battery and replace it.

They also say that 4g is a major battery drain, so just disable it and use 3g which is still decently fast. You want the extra speed, you take the extra battery hit. Simple. Nor do I understand how WiFi tethering isn't useful and comes with a detrimental trade-off. If you don't want to use it, don't use it. You don't have to have it on all the time, everywhere you go so if you want to use it turn it on. Try running the iPhone with WiFi and 3g radio always on and you'll see the battery takes a hit because of it.

Battery life matters... A LOT.

Using 4G will cause massive battery drain from what I understand. The same will happen with enabling the WiFi tethering (not to mention the extra cost). It is fair to crticize the phone for having poor battery life that is made even worse when you enable 4G or WiFi tethering...

To say that Sprint warned you that 4G will make your phone's battery life suck even more isn't an excuse when you are paying an extra $10/m for that 4G access.

Finally the large screen. Yes it does take some time to get used to but once that is done you can use the phone with 1 hand. I have an HD2 and the only things I use more than 1 hand for is multitouch and typing in something. This has seriously got to be the first review that I've seen that criticizes a 4.3" screen; not even the hd2 reviews complained about it. Everyone has agreed that the huge screen is fantastic.

To each his own. I purchased the Sprint EVO for my brother for his birthday on launch day. He loved the screen and was telling me I had to get one. I personally find the screen too big. It looks nice to some, but not everyone wants a screen that large.

The largest I'm going to be OK with is the size of my Touch Pro 2, but even that is pushing it.

Yes faster browsing speed doesn't really add anything to the phone. I wonder why we're coming out with LTE next year with a theoretical 100mbps speed then. Nobody needs it :rolleyes:

Since you need to run your phone with 4G off most of the time or risk battery life shrinking into crap territory I have to agree with the author. I don't think (from your quote) that he is saying faster browsing isn't welcome, but it shouldn't be done in a way that causes so much battery loss. As if you have too much battery drain you'll need to keep it off. If you can't use 4G because it will kill your battery it doesn't add anything to your phone (as you're not able to use it anyway).

Battery life matters... A LOT.
Since you need to run your phone with 4G off most of the time or risk battery life shrinking into crap territory I have to agree with the author. I don't think (from your quote) that he is saying faster browsing isn't welcome, but it shouldn't be done in a way that causes so much battery loss. As if you have too much battery drain you'll need to keep it off. If you can't use 4G because it will kill your battery it doesn't add anything to your phone (as you're not able to use it anyway).

Theres comments that talks about that on the arstechnica review.

I'm not sure why everyone is having such a problem with battery life. I use my EVO nearly non stop, and it easily lasts me the day (12 hours). It's about the same/slightly better as my iTouch. if I'm playing with it constantly, the battery will dip, but never this "unable to get through the day" shenanigans I keep hearing about. but that's just me
I think some phones just have vastly different battery life, because I've never had anywhere near this bad battery life. I get 4 hrs as a 4g *hotspot* (read: tethering WITH 4g on) and 36 hrs easily with typical use. it's not like you're usually sitting around for eight hours browsing on a phone
I think too much is being made about the EVO's battery life when this appears to be a 4G problem. So when you turn out 4G you get about 10 hours of moderate use? Well I guess it partly depends on your definition of moderate use but I get about 10 hours of moderate use from my iPhone 3GS. I use it a lot; looking up contact details, firing off and responding to emails, looking things up, using Google Maps to find places, making calls and so on.
Oh, and I think Ryan points out a very valid point, the baseline settings for the EVO probably make it's battery look much worse than it is. I think it's a bit much to say that is the phone's greatest weakness. After all, a few minor customizations (and a slightly longer than normal battery calibration period) now has my EVO routinely getting 16-24 hours between charges, at moderate to high usage.

Theres comments that talks about that on the arstechnica review.

I was just commenting from what I've read and what you stated. Since I don't own an EVO myself I can't comment on how hard its battery hit is, but my point was simply to state how important battery life is.

HTC can get it wrong. I still remember the dark days of my Sprint Touch Pro where I had to carry around 4 spare batteries to get through a heavy usage day and two to get through a normal day. But I'm a heavy user of my phone. I'm quick to pull out my phone to check a variety of information sources. I am using Exchange Push with about 200+ emails a day, etc.

Even the MUCH improved (battery life wise) Touch Pro 2 can't get me through a whole day on a single charge.

Battery life isn't HTC's strong point.

HTC can get it wrong. I still remember the dark days of my Sprint Touch Pro where I had to carry around 4 spare batteries to get through a heavy usage day and two to get through a normal day. But I'm a heavy user of my phone. I'm quick to pull out my phone to check a variety of information sources. I am using Exchange Push with about 200+ emails a day, etc.

I'm not saying the battery life is great, or that the battery life is bad. I don't have an Evo so I can't comment on it either. But according to comments, people who have evo 4gs don't seem to suffer from as much of a battery life drain as the review suggested; all the comments say that the evo gets them through more than 10-12 hours with 4g activated. So could it just be a simple software issue? One of the commenter's said that he did some minor tweaks to his evo to increase battery life and I know my hd2 shipped with a pretty poor battery life, and then an update fixed it making it much much better.

What I didn't understand was very few people made the iPhone 3gs to be a bad phone because of its battery life, which isn't better than the evo 4g. So why should the Evo be subject to more harsher reviews than the 3GS in regards to its battery, even with taking into consideration the phone is a lot more powerful, has more radios, and has a bigger screen with a higher resolution?

I'm not saying the battery life is great, or that the battery life is bad. I don't have an Evo so I can't comment on it either. But according to comments, people who have evo 4gs don't seem to suffer from as much of a battery life drain as the review suggested; all the comments say that the evo gets them through more than 10-12 hours with 4g activated. So could it just be a simple software issue? One of the commenter's said that he did some minor tweaks to his evo to increase battery life and I know my hd2 shipped with a pretty poor battery life, and then an update fixed it making it much much better.

What I didn't understand was very few people made the iPhone 3gs to be a bad phone because of its battery life, which isn't better than the evo 4g. So why should the Evo be subject to more harsher reviews than the 3GS in regards to its battery, even with taking into consideration the phone is a lot more powerful, has more radios, and has a bigger screen with a higher resolution?

It has a lot to do with the fact the EVO wasn't released last year with the iPhone 3GS. The fact it is out now means any comparisons, valid or invalid, will be made to the phone dropping out now.

I agree there are factors that reflect the battery life differences between a phone like the iPhone 4 and the EVO, but I hope HTC learns a few lessons. They need to go beyond raw specs and try their best to optimize the whole phone.

Battery life matters... A LOT.

Using 4G will cause massive battery drain from what I understand. The same will happen with enabling the WiFi tethering (not to mention the extra cost). It is fair to crticize the phone for having poor battery life that is made even worse when you enable 4G or WiFi tethering...

To say that Sprint warned you that 4G will make your phone's battery life suck even more isn't an excuse when you are paying an extra $10/m for that 4G access.

You do still understand that you can get larger battery or even carry additional one in your pocket if you need it so bad.. something you can't do with iPhone. Again, CHOICE!

Razorfold is on the money here.. Evo 4G is absolutely the best smartphone on the market. With amazing power comes battery demand, but thankfully you can buy higher rated battery and get a spare one and it's not a big deal. I'd still have that option, than have everything closed up in iPhone and when it's done it's done.

Not to mention due to micro-USB charger you can charge this phone ANYWHERE where there is USB, plus the converters for cars and chargers are cheaper this way too.

I mean it's such a non-issue it's not even funny.

And again, none of the features that EVO 4G has like wifi tethering, USB tethering, 4G network (where available) and even 3G network is faster than AT&T are available on iPhone. These days even Nexus One has 720p @ 30fps recording with some software updates by 3rd parties, not that 720p at 30fps or at 24fps plays a huge difference anyways. And let's not even talk about retina display hype. Apple has again created an non-standard display that fits only them. 800x480 vs 960x640 is completely irrelevant on these screen sizes. Nobody is holding a phone an inch from their nose, so the whole you can't pixels is completely ridiculous. Super AMOLED displays are better than IPS LCD anyways.

I am personally waiting for Droid X to finally get rid of iPhones and garbage AT&T and switch to Verizon.

Plus, Evo 4G actually works.. New reports say that iPhone 4 loses reception when you hold it specifically with you hand because of the whole antenna being the frame thing, plus people are reporting yellow spots on the "magical" retina-display.

What I hate is that people write these biased reviews and spitting and not acknowledging when Apple has been outmatched with technology and openness, but then the same site and authors start bitching about how Apple is trying to take away their ads. Stop sucking up and be objective douche-bags.

It has a lot to do with the fact the EVO wasn't released last year with the iPhone 3GS. The fact it is out now means any comparisons, valid or invalid, will be made to the phone dropping out now.

I agree there are factors that reflect the battery life differences between a phone like the iPhone 4 and the EVO, but I hope HTC learns a few lessons. They need to go beyond raw specs and try their best to optimize the whole phone.

I don't think HTC needs to learn anything.. their recent phones are super powerful. You can get larger battery or not.. The phone lasts all day.. I have a friend who has it. He says, for first few days it was kind of bad until the battery was fully formed.. so it took one or two full charges.. after that it lasted him easily a full day. Of course if he was watching movies, playing games and similar, battery drained significantly faster.

My Nexus One lasts me whole day with it's miserably small battery.

But it's not really HTC engineering that's an issue here.. It's Android that gets better with every revision. Android 2.2 has significantly improved battery life. Same operations and optimizations have made a big difference.

I'm just annoyed by this whole apple-fanboy and PR tactics to try to paint Android phones and Evo 4G in bad light because it kicked Apple's iPhone 3G/3GS butt. It even kicks iPhone 4 butt.

And this will soon change when we get 2Ghz dual core ARM processors in our new phones from Motorola, Samsung, HTC and so forth.. I guess Apple's PR will have to work overtime to try to persuade people that iPhone is still better but eventually there will be a point where no BS will work anymore, because Apple can't keep up releasing revisions of their phone every few months. At best they can do it once a year, so they will become obsolete fast.

You do still understand that you can get larger battery or even carry additional one in your pocket if you need it so bad.. something you can't do with iPhone. Again, CHOICE!

Razorfold is on the money here.. Evo 4G is absolutely the best smartphone on the market. With amazing power comes battery demand, but thankfully you can buy higher rated battery and get a spare one and it's not a big deal. I'd still have that option, than have everything closed up in iPhone and when it's done it's done.

Not to mention due to micro-USB charger you can charge this phone ANYWHERE where there is USB, plus the converters for cars and chargers are cheaper this way too.

I mean it's such a non-issue it's not even funny.

I am no iPhone fan. I think having a battery I can't change it stupid... Now that I've gotten that out of the way.

Just because I can add an extended battery or buy spares doesn't mean the OEM shouldn't design the phone to work properly. Put in plain terms. The OEM should be honest about their battery life up front. They should baseline their battery life tests on how ACTUAL people use their devices. They should then deliver a device that can last 20+ hours a charge in that usage case (to allow the battery to wear well).

But to be clear. There is NO "Best" phone. We each have different usage patterns and likes. I personally don't rank the EVO very high on my list of cool phones. That doesn't make my ranked list right or wrong. It is better if we stick to tangible differences (like battery life being too short or just right) and not bring intangible and vague differences (like your "best" designation) into the discussion.

The OEM should be honest about their battery life up front. They should baseline their battery life tests on how ACTUAL people use their devices. They should then deliver a device that can last 20+ hours a charge in that usage case (to allow the battery to wear well).

That's one thing that struck me as odd with the Evo. I cannot find an official battery report anywhere; every other phone on HTC's website has battery life listed.

Could this mean Sprint / HTC knew about the battery life issues, and are working on a fix? Because like I said, for now its all pointing to a software issue. People who have rooted or tweaked their phones, aren't having bad battery life. The people who haven't and are still on stock roms / settings, are.

That's one thing that struck me as odd with the Evo. I cannot find an official battery report anywhere; every other phone on HTC's website has battery life listed.

Could this mean Sprint / HTC knew about the battery life issues, and are working on a fix? Because like I said, for now its all pointing to a software issue. People who have rooted or tweaked their phones, aren't having bad battery life. The people who haven't and are still on stock roms / settings, are.

That is quite possible. They probably rushed the software out to beat getting the device out before the iPhone 4.

I agree with Frazell. Battery life isn't HTC's best feature. On the HTC Incredible (similar to the EVO - except 3.7", no front facing camera and a few other minor things), the 1300mAH battery doesn't even fully charge. The phone claims it charges fully, but it doesn't. It drops from 100-95% in a matter of minutes, and that's not right. To get a better charge, one has to wait for the indication that the phone is fully charged, unplug the charger, turn off the phone, then charge it again till the light turns green. It's a pain in the ass. I like that there is a market for extended batteries for the Incredible and other phones these days, but the extended batteries are overpriced and add to the phone's dimensions.

The issue I'm having with the Incredible is fixable through an OTA. But, HTC (AND other manufacturers) really needs to start working on battery life. I want to start seeing 2-3 days of usage on a single charge on smartphones. I'm also a pretty heavy user, but I do try and save battery where I can. I can usually manage 30 hours of light usage (3 push accounts, AIM, gtalk, internet, etc).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!