Console Vs PC  

352 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you prefer?

    • Console (PS/Xbox/Gamecube etc)
      51
    • PC (Windows games/Mac/linux)
      119
    • Both
      44
  2. 2. Which controller system do you prefer

    • Keyboard and mouse (PC)
      168
    • Controller (Any controller for any platform)
      105
    • Joystick
      18
    • Paddle
      1
    • Trackball
      2
    • Arcade style Joystick (Joystick with buttons)
      9
    • Steering wheel
      19
    • Motion sensing (Wii/Move/Kinect)
      13
    • Light gun (Retro)
      2
    • Touch screen (DS/iPad/iPhone)
      10
    • 'Gameboard' (see picture in thread)
      5


Recommended Posts

PC for me. :yes:

I use my keyboard for shot em ups and a PC version of an Xbox 360 controller for driving games. For me the frame rates are better the graphics quality is better, (I have a Sapphire 5970 Toxic) and the games are cheaper.

There is a place for console gaming, I have a Wii which is a bit of fun, and in no way do I even think of comparing it to my PC gaming.

My son has an Xbox 360, and I can understand why it appeals to people, as you can just pop in a disk and play.

However, I do like the idea of playing around with the settings etc in PC gaming and what my PC can do to gaming is outstanding. :D

It comes down to the spec personly...

PS3

1xPPC 3.0GHZ IBM Cell

256MB MainMemory

256MN Nvidia RX7 (or something close to that)

12 Buttons, 1 D-Pad, 2 Sticks.

ps3 480/720/1080 locked at 60FPS

-(web browers suck) (wifi is slow) (Other OS was removed) (First Person Shoots are horrible useing a pad of any sort) (Can not replace parts) (can not upgrade parts expect HDD) (Short Life Span) ( Lack of Apps)

+(Stream video from Windows Home Server Excellent) (Plays singstar quite well) (play Games that are not RTS/FPS really good) (plays mp4 High Deff Video file extreamly well of the HDD) (People with no Brains can run with out messing it up)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PC

AMD Phenon II Quad 3.4GHZ

8GIG DDR2 800MHZ

3xRadeon 5770 3GIG GDDR5 memory

Keyboard (standered 101Keys)

Mouse R.A.T.7 (8 Buttons 1 Scroll)

PC Higher Resultuion with higher FPS

-(not cheap$$$) (not ment for people that only know how to use a console) (not for people that don't know how to mantain a System)

+(Plays Games 100%) (Internet Works best) (Plays ever video format best) (plays Music best) (Faster net Connections) (The only REAL way to play RTS and FPS) (Longerv Life Span) (Longer Support) (Parts Can be Repleaced) (Can be upgraded) (Bigest Selection of Apps out there)

HardCore Gammer and HardCore Gamming will alwazs be found on the PC well Casuel Games will remain on the consoles.

PC GAMERS ARE REAL GAMERS AND DONT CARE ABOUT TROPHYES OR ACHEVEMNTS. WE GAME BECUZ WE LOVE TO GAME. NOT TO HAVE THE HIGHEST GAMER SCORE! IT MEANS NOTHING>

Last notes:

Example: Call of Duty MW2 on Xbox 360 or PC. Ones that pick 360 have no skill. THe ones that pick PC Are "In it to win it no matter how you skin it" <true skill lives here<

  • 4 weeks later...

Want some facts in an opinion based thread? :p

PC has better graphics, so if your a graphic ######, PC is your choice. DX11 is better than 9, and no console can match the power and graphics a PC can put out.

Comfort = Consoles can win this, but PC allows you to use any controller on it, so you could also say they are tied. Though xbox does not allow for keyboard and mouse configs, so it could be a little less equal than PC and PS3.

Price = This again is based off of starting from scratch. PC rig maybe 800 for a decent PC that will play almost anything out right now, plus monitor , so around $1000+. A console, $300, then you need a good TV to play it on. You could go for a monitor and have the same as a PC and keep the price lower, or if you go like I did, you get a big ass 55' TV and end up spending easily over $1000 just on it lol. So PC can be cheaper as well, if you sacrifice on viewing space with consoles.

Games = PC is getting most console games as pretty decent ports, but not all. Consoles will win on the games frontier, at least for new games. PC has a so many games out that they can choose from though, if we were to base it on that, PC would win.

Reliability - PC. A PC is more than likely not going to totally fail on you. A HDD might, Powersupply, or DVD drive, but you can replace those easily and cheaply, as well as that same day. A console breaks, doesn't matter what it is, you either pay for a repair, send it to get fixed, or buy another. Either way, you spend more money fixing a smaller issue, and it will most likely not be fixed the same day. Also, PC parts don't usually break down quick, and can take usually over 5+ years to break down. Take that with being able to open a PC up, clean out the parts, and do maintenance on it, it can last almost a decade with no problems if you did it right. Usually you only have to worry about 3 things on a PC, which are Video card, HDD, and Powersupply. Everything else can last much longer than the current gen consoles ever will.

Hands down, a PC will be the best choice for a real gamer. Those who say otherwise probably don't have a good enough PC to do gaming on. I know my PC has just recently not been able to play many of the newest games, so I went ahead and got a PS3. I haven't had a console since N64, so I figured I have plenty to catch up on, as on the PC I have tired of the insane collection lol.

What a console can do, a PC can do and more. It's like asking what is better, a biplane or a harrier jet. Sure both fly, but one can fly circles around the other.

I play both, but PC will always be superior.

I use to say "PC all the way!" But in this day and age, they're becoming more and more obsolete.

Consoles have a huge library of games and a dedicated community all to their own. With a PC, you

have to upgrade to keep up, and in many cases, they end up costing more than a console! Plus,

with a PC, you have annoying upkeep and maintenance, which also impacts performance. Finally,

you have all the annoying DRM and rootkits to deal with, and that's not even including conventional

malware. Not worth it.

We grew up with Nintendo (well, consoles in general), so I think that's the way

they're meant to be played.

I use to say "PC all the way!" But in this day and age, they're becoming more and more obsolete.

Consoles have a huge library of games and a dedicated community all to their own. With a PC, you

have to upgrade to keep up, and in many cases, they end up costing more than a console! Plus,

with a PC, you have annoying upkeep and maintenance, which also impacts performance. Finally,

you have all the annoying DRM and rootkits to deal with, and that's not even including conventional

malware. Not worth it.

We grew up with Nintendo (well, consoles in general), so I think that's the way

they're meant to be played.

You are viewing upgrading a PC incorrectly compared to a console. Yes, you have to keep upgrading maybe everyone once a year to do the absolute most on the absolutely newest tech game, but for all the games that have come out, it really is not like that anymore. And yes, while you get that option to keep upgrading, thats what you get, an option. With consoles, there is no upgrading, ever. You are stuck with whatever tech they put in there and the limitations bound to it. So while PC'ers are enjoying awesome dx11 games, console players are still on dx9. Sort of like an apple vs android debate, freedom of choice vs locked in methods.

Used to be console, but in the last couple of years and ever since I've found neowin, became interested in computers and built my own gaming machine, I'd definitely say a PC! I have a PS3 which I use to play exclusive games and any bargains I can pick up for it, but the main base of my gaming is on my computer, the nicer graphics and easy ways to communicate with my friends whilst playing games makes it so much more enjoyable. Keyboard and mouse all the way, although for platformers and racing games I use my 360 controller as it doesn't feel right with the keyboard. :)

PC has better graphics

True.

Comfort = Consoles can win this

While I agree that I find gaming more comfortable on the console, that isn't a fact.

Though xbox does not allow for keyboard and mouse configs

Actually you can on the Xbox, so long as the game supports it. FFXI on the 360 supports k/m for example. The entire UI also support k/m on the 360 as well as the media center that is built in.

A console, $300, then you need a good TV to play it on.

Everyone already has a TV, so you don't need to equate that in the cost. You can get a console for $199 (Xbox 360 S), and play every Xbox 360 game, online or offline. So it would be $199 for the console, $60 for each game. No need to buy a TV.

Consoles will win on the games frontier

Yup. Consoles have substantially more game variety.

Reliability - PC. A PC is more than likely not going to totally fail on you.

PCs are unreliable by nature. Windows sucks. Both consoles and PC's are unreliable and can be costly to repair.

Hands down, a PC will be the best choice for a real gamer.

Not true. Just another opinion.

Those who say otherwise probably don't have a good enough PC to do gaming on.

Nope. I think a real gamer is someone who likes to play games.

What a console can do, a PC can do and more.

It also costs more, and plays less games.

I play both, but PC will always be superior.

Another opinion.

I thought you were bringing facts? tongue.gif

Everyone already has a TV, so you don't need to equate that in the cost. You can get a console for $199 (Xbox 360 S), and play every Xbox 360 game, online or offline. So it would be $199 for the console, $60 for each game. No need to buy a TV.

Yup. Consoles have substantially more game variety.

PCs are unreliable by nature. Windows sucks. Both consoles and PC's are unreliable and can be costly to repair.

Nope. I think a real gamer is someone who likes to play games.

It also costs more, and plays less games.

I thought you were bringing facts? tongue.gif

I don't have a TV. There you go.

More variety on consoles? That's a fail.

Reliability depends on the quality of the hardware, therefore, there isn't a winner here.

You got it wrong in the "plays less games" part. Totally wrong. May I suggest native games as one, and emulated games as the second kind (you know, PS, PS2, legacy consoles and stuff...).

The PC is a superior invention, yes.

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

I used to be a PC guy when I was younger but as I've gotten older I have gotten really busy and don't have the time for all the necessary tweaking of PC games so I have switched over to consoles. I think the 360 controller is by far the best but I am tired of Microsoft treating their customers like dirt so if Sony could ever put out a decent controller I'll be buying their machine.

I used to be a PC guy when I was younger but as I've gotten older I have gotten really busy and don't have the time for all the necessary tweaking of PC games so I have switched over to consoles. I think the 360 controller is by far the best but I am tired of Microsoft treating their customers like dirt so if Sony could ever put out a decent controller I'll be buying their machine.

oh there is its called PS3 :rolleyes:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
    • I disagree here sorry. The majority of their customers are corporations who are locked in to their eco system and have no choice. Private individuals don't contribute that much to their income.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!