Console Vs PC  

352 members have voted

  1. 1. Which do you prefer?

    • Console (PS/Xbox/Gamecube etc)
      51
    • PC (Windows games/Mac/linux)
      119
    • Both
      44
  2. 2. Which controller system do you prefer

    • Keyboard and mouse (PC)
      168
    • Controller (Any controller for any platform)
      105
    • Joystick
      18
    • Paddle
      1
    • Trackball
      2
    • Arcade style Joystick (Joystick with buttons)
      9
    • Steering wheel
      19
    • Motion sensing (Wii/Move/Kinect)
      13
    • Light gun (Retro)
      2
    • Touch screen (DS/iPad/iPhone)
      10
    • 'Gameboard' (see picture in thread)
      5


Recommended Posts

Nice way to start off, I know know that I'm arguing with a 15 year-old living in Mom's basement. I voted for Consoles, not specifically the 360. I happen to own a 360 because I like the controller and a few of the games better. Unless you want to call me a console fanboy, which is as retarded as me calling you an oxygen fanboy. By the way, you can quote me line by line by just highlighting part of my post and pressing that nice shiny "Quote" button. Us grown ups actually sometimes even manually type in the [ quote][/ quote]. Not that difficult. Try it, it'll make your garbage a lot easier to read and address.

...A flash gamer? So you're comparing a $300 console that can play full blown 3D games with a $300 machine that's good for....Robot Unicorn Attack? Fantastic comparison. At any rate, For the cost of that $600 PC, I can get a 360 elite with a 23" HD monitor and a game, and still have enough left over to get a few months of Live. Very poor argument there, PCs may be better in some ways, but will never be price efficient. Let's also not forget that in the real world, adults buy Windows, not pirate it, so in $600, you haven't even factored in the price of a Windows 7 license. Unless you intend to game on Linux. Which, if you do, I have pity for you.

Completely true. Firstly, the "new" (I say "new" because they've been out for a long time now) Jasper chipsets cannot Red Ring (Or if they do it's very very rare), so the chances of complete XB failure are quite slim. And I say again, you can repair your Xbox just as easily in a third part repair shop as you can with a computer. On the topic of losing files any memory stick up to 16 GB will back up your save files on your 360 (not sure about the PS3). Some online games even store your data on their servers (COD, Rainbow 6) and any content your purchase on Live can be re-downloaded at any time on any console provided you recover your gamertag. Seriously, you're really reaching for thin air now; the point is if your PC crashes to the point where your files get ****ed, you've lost files and stability (temporarily) on a machine that you use for your real life. Us grown ups actually use our computers for big-boy things like writing up company reports and spreadsheets. So I say again, what's your point?

Consoles play their games perfectly when the dev has put in the time and effort to test, retest, and fine tune his or her code to ensure perfect operation on the Xbox. The upside to this is that he/she doesn't need to worry about multiple configurations, only the one that the 360 needs (or PS3, if the case calls for it). The PS3, compared to the 360's architecture, is vastly more complicated and new to developers, and most STILL haven't utilized all the cores of the PS3 or its full graphical potential, so I am not surprised that a PORT of a popular game plays better on a familiar console architecture. At any rate, those points still don't make much sense. I don't quite understand what you're trying to argue, I never said they'll always play the newest games properly, I simply said that hardware requirements are never an issue for the consoles. Whether or not they "stutter" has everything to do with how the game is coded and nothing to do with the hardware of the consoles.

Although I'm sure you'd love to think that, I don't think you've ever seen the difference between Gears of War 1 and 2. Or between Forza 2 and 3. And so on. I don't give a damn about dx9 or 10 or whatever irrelevant PC-exclusive technology you want to use, I'm not blind and I see a clear graphical improvement between games that first came out and games now. And like I said, you're so obssessed with dx8 this and dx9 that to the point that you really don't seem to understand not all games are equal. Games that were out for the original Xbox and moved to the 360 don't instantly look better because of the hardware. The actual graphical elements and resources used in the game need to be top notch and usually completely redone, the game engine needs to properly handle all the elements being rendered, and the physics engine (if applicable) needs to be able to cope with both. If those aren't' the case, then ANY game, console or pc, will look like crap.

...Every time you play a console game, all that goes through your mind is how they would look with DirectX? That's IT? Nothing else about the game interests you? I don't know if I should call that flatout pathetic, or just simply go with the fact you're biased to hell and back.

No, you've heard what you wanted to hear because you are a PC gamer and you probably just Googled "RROD" and assumed the number of results that came back equated the number of people. I myself have owned the same 360 since the start, and the same is the case with the 15+ people I regularly play with on Live. It's nto that difficult. I know people who have the original Non-Jasper chipsets and they're still doing fine (they keep their 360s well ventilated). At the same time, It's so damn easy for me to just shoot right back at you how many times I've read forum posts about games crashing people's computers or people having hardware failures with their PC. See how irrelevant that is?

/sigh lolz. w/e. some of us adults prefer to put our points in point form rather than bother to type out /quote etc. sorry get over it.

flash games are big right now. not my cup of tea, but really the big thing these days. just ask zynga. $60-80 games says otherwise about price efficiency. upfront a 360+23" monitor might be cheaper but buy new games regularly over the course of say a year it will easily equal out. and there are half decent PCs that cost $600 with win, besides the fact that you can easily "transfer" a win license to a new PC.

lolz at this whole paragraph. PCs have many options to easily and nearly instantly backup mission critical data. so you can redownload your games with xbl, guess what i can do that with steam. and warranties tend to be better for PC parts than they are for any console, along with the ability to trouble shoot PC problems long before RMA. as if fairly bad prebuilts were even as bad as the 360's have proven to be here.

which is why post release patches have become more and more common and necessary in the last decade for console games yes? and i think the stutter seen on certain ps 3 games and even 360 games is very indicative of both the hardware and the dev wquality expected of consoles and their games. it's true pc gamers put up with grabage at releases from their games but this has been true for 20 years. console games on the other hand used to be different. not so different nowadays.

i absolutely rofled at this paragraph. dx9 was a huge leap from dx8. overall console games look much the same form the 360/ps3 launch to now. if certain franchise looks better to you for some reason it's probably due to the art department, not actual technical graphics improvement.

/sigh lolz. w/e. some of us adults prefer to put our points in point form rather than bother to type out /quote etc. sorry get over it.

flash games are big right now. not my cup of tea, but really the big thing these days. just ask zynga. $60-80 games says otherwise about price efficiency. upfront a 360+23" monitor might be cheaper but buy new games regularly over the course of say a year it will easily equal out. and there are half decent PCs that cost $600 with win, besides the fact that you can easily "transfer" a win license to a new PC.

lolz at this whole paragraph. PCs have many options to easily and nearly instantly backup mission critical data. so you can redownload your games with xbl, guess what i can do that with steam. and warranties tend to be better for PC parts than they are for any console, along with the ability to trouble shoot PC problems long before RMA. as if fairly bad prebuilts were even as bad as the 360's have proven to be here.

which is why post release patches have become more and more common and necessary in the last decade for console games yes? and i think the stutter seen on certain ps 3 games and even 360 games is very indicative of both the hardware and the dev wquality expected of consoles and their games. it's true pc gamers put up with grabage at releases from their games but this has been true for 20 years. console games on the other hand used to be different. not so different nowadays.

i absolutely rofled at this paragraph. dx9 was a huge leap from dx8. overall console games look much the same form the 360/ps3 launch to now. if certain franchise looks better to you for some reason it's probably due to the art department, not actual technical graphics improvement.

Blah blah blah.

Translation: "I'm a whiny little child who doesn't like logic and I didn't read your big long post because it scared me so I'll just say 'lol' every other word and make it seem like you're stupid."

I think I hit the nail on the head there. Nice try, by the way. (not) PC games also cost the same range, just FYI. The thing is, I can buy used console games. Because of your DRM restrictions and copy protection and StarForge (or whatever it's called), that's not an option for you. Get over it, PC gaming is not cheap and never will be. Guess what? Like I said before, I can play Assassin's Creed 2 WITHOUT an internet connection? Like, omigosh. Is there something wrong with post-release patches? Because I don't see what's wrong with waiting an extra 10 seconds to play my game with bugs fixed.

Again, I don't give a damn about dx8 or dx9, I'm more concerned with whether or not my games play smoothly and look great. Which they do.

You keep whining about dx9, I'll keep paying far less for a more consistent and stable gaming experience that doesn't affect my work life.

It's a shame. I was searching for someone who doesn't have the attention span of a 13 year-old want to refute me? Actually, never mind. I think I'm done with this thread. Good bye.

<snipped>

Us grown ups actually use our computers for big-boy things like writing up company reports and spreadsheets. So I say again, what's your point?

<snipped>

Pardon me? I must be using my computer incorrectly then.???:blink:

I had an Xbox 360 and couldn't stand the noise it made or come to grips with using the controller. Gave it away after a week. (to a 12 year old???:shiftyninja:?)

PC for me all the way.

Pardon me? I must be using my computer incorrectly then. :blink:

I had an Xbox 360 and couldn't stand the noise it made or come to grips with using the controller. Gave it away after a week. (to a 12 year old :shiftyninja: )

PC for me all the way.

I never hear my 360.

Us grown ups actually use our computers for big-boy things like writing up company reports and spreadsheets. So I say again, what's your point?

Last time I checked grow up's produce games which result in profits. Must be only kids working at blizzard and others.

Seriously stop trolling and shu away.

Back on topic then. I'm a PC guy my self.

Blah blah blah.

Translation: "I'm a whiny little child who doesn't like logic and I didn't read your big long post because it scared me so I'll just say 'lol' every other word and make it seem like you're stupid."

I think I hit the nail on the head there. Nice try, by the way. (not) PC games also cost the same range, just FYI. The thing is, I can buy used console games. Because of your DRM restrictions and copy protection and StarForge (or whatever it's called), that's not an option for you. Get over it, PC gaming is not cheap and never will be. Guess what? Like I said before, I can play Assassin's Creed 2 WITHOUT an internet connection? Like, omigosh. Is there something wrong with post-release patches? Because I don't see what's wrong with waiting an extra 10 seconds to play my game with bugs fixed.

Again, I don't give a damn about dx8 or dx9, I'm more concerned with whether or not my games play smoothly and look great. Which they do.

You keep whining about dx9, I'll keep paying far less for a more consistent and stable gaming experience that doesn't affect my work life.

It's a shame. I was searching for someone who doesn't have the attention span of a 13 year-old want to refute me? Actually, never mind. I think I'm done with this thread. Good bye.

If you are looking for ingredients to make an epic fail post, look no further than Tree's post. My god son, you really don't believe anything you posted, do you?

/facepalm

seriously. no wonder this forum has the rep that it has.

Yeah and your cringe-worthy posts does a lot to help.

i've been actively posting a few months. despite my bad typing english i'm sure your 20k posts has more to do with it than anything i have contributed.

btw i not that it matters i post and am respected on a few decent enthusiast forums with much better prestige than this forum and have no issues. ofc we tend to get the fanboyism out of the way quickly and decent moderation to move non realted post to more suitable forum but here we are stuck with the forums we have are we not.

i've lurked for a while and i have to say despite not paying attention to who posts what, this forum has the rep it deserves. fanboyism, personal attacks and such are common here. i prefer to avoid such non sense.

i have used regularly or owned a 360 a ps3 and 2 decent PCs within the last 3 years. i keep in touch with owners of all 3 consoles and regular users of of all 4 platforms. i read the news and the rumours about each platform above and beyond what is seen at neowin. i value irl experience over FUD any day of the week.

if you or anyone else wishes to continue personal attacks against me my advice is to save it for some who gives a ****. this will make our discussions that much smoother and interesting.

i come with no FUD, a little bias, and 20 years of limited hands on experience. when i buy i look at all options regardless of my preference and spend the time to find what's best

now that that's cleared up:

i obviously prefer PCs for various reasons. and for me they are a better value. perhaps for you they are not. perhaps you prefer to spend $300 on a console to game and $300-$600 on a PC to browse.or maybe you can deal with internet browsing on a ps3. me i like to do it all from my desk, and i prefer keyboard and mouse to a clumsy controller. if you prefer the reverse than good for you. but for me and many others, PC is the better value.

Where's the Mac option? :shifty:

Jokes aside, both PC and consoles have their place, depending on the game. GTA is better suited for a console, games like the Total War series are better suited for the PC.

I'm primarily PC these days, but it depends on the genre: sports/wrestling games, I'd rather play on the console. Turn-based strategy games and RPGs/Adventure games that aren't first person, I can go either way. For everything else (shooters, First-Person RPGs, MMOs, etc.), I say PC.

But, yeah, I'm primarily a PC gamer. Haven't gotten around to grabbing a PS3 or a Wii yet, and my PS2 has been collecting dust for the past year. ^_^

Are you kidding me.... PC with a keyboard + mouse.

/thread.

This. Anything even remotely like a FPS using a gamepad is just clunky and aggravating. By the time I've managed to line up a shot with a gamepad, the bad guy has already removed my skull, tossed it over the horizon, and danced on my corpse a few times.

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
    • I disagree here sorry. The majority of their customers are corporations who are locked in to their eco system and have no choice. Private individuals don't contribute that much to their income.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!