Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if this will help or not, but this is the code I use to make "about:blank" transparent

#browser,
#content > tabbox > tabpanels {
  background-color: transparent !important;
}

#main-window[stylish-url="about:blank"] #content browser { 
   opacity: 0 !important;
}

Hi foxxyn8

I couldnt get this to work , i have a white background instead....does this works on windows 7 only cos i am using vista64 =p

Hi foxxyn8

I couldnt get this to work , i have a white background instead....does this works on windows 7 only cos i am using vista64 =p

that's the old code. use this instead (requires stylish):

#appcontent,
#content > tabbox > tabpanels {
  background-color: transparent !important;
}

#main-window[stylish-url="about:blank"]:not([onclose^="PrintUtils"]) #content browser { 
   opacity: 0 !important;
}

Does using stylish and having userchrome.css have any differences (startup UI responsiveness, blah blah)? I'm already satisfied with my userchrome so I'm thinking about removing stylish.

Foxxyn8 had pointed out that userChrome.css can't handle anonymous content, if I understood correctly.

The other advantages of using Stylish may be useful to beginners (moi) like previews (which have a "proof-reading" ability) and not having to restart the browser to see the effect of changes.

Foxxyn8 had pointed out that userChrome.css can't handle anonymous content, if I understood correctly.

The other advantages of using Stylish may be useful to beginners (moi) like previews (which have a "proof-reading" ability) and not having to restart the browser to see the effect of changes.

To expand on this, the difference is that userContent/Chrome are user stylesheets whereas stylish uses user agent(UA) stylesheets. The difference being, in particular, UA can apply styles to native anonymous elements and to CSS anonymous boxes.

Also stylish handles the functions of both userChrome and userContent.

As far as performance goes, I've never noticed any difference. Stylish just makes it easier all around.

Back to beg for more help. :laugh: . What do I add to grey out the favicons on the bookmark toolbar, or everywhere else for that matter? I saw some code that did it earlier in the thread, but I haven't been able to find it again.

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/921416-share-your-custom-firefoxminefield-4-stylish-scripts/page__view__findpost__p__593741318

I don't like "text-shadow" (or "etched" effect or anything that makes letters less clear-cut) which I see in a lot of drop-down menus and dialog boxes/panels. Is there a general way to fix that?

In userStyle.css, this works great:

* { text-shadow: none !important; }

I don't like "text-shadow" (or "etched" effect or anything that makes letters less clear-cut) which I see in a lot of drop-down menus and dialog boxes/panels. Is there a general way to fix that?

In userStyle.css, this works great:

* { text-shadow: none !important; }

I don't think it gets any more general than that. You're telling every selector not to use a text-shadow.

I don't think it gets any more general than that. You're telling every selector not to use a text-shadow.

Foxxyn8, but how do I get it to work for the UI (chrome?) of the browser (as opposed to the page content)?

I already have this as a specific example:

#FindToolbar *{ -moz-appearance: none !important; background: #333 !important; color:black !important; font-weight: bold !important; text-shadow: none !important;}

Without it, certain text (Next, Previous) in the Find Toolbar would appear "different" (blurry to me) when there is no search text entered.

So what I want to know is whether there's a universal code that can be used in my style that affects various aspects of the UI (chrome?).

(Just to be clear, I have separate styles in Stylish to reflect chrome versus content.)

I don't think it gets any more general than that. You're telling every selector not to use a text-shadow.

Interesting (and a bit alarming at first). I put the same line in my "chrome" Stylish code. And now I don't see the text-shadow effect :) . The alarming bit is that I don't see the text at all in some cases unless I hover over where it should be. This is okay sometimes but could cause panic at other times.

Interesting (and a bit alarming at first). I put the same line in my "chrome" Stylish code. And now I don't see the text-shadow effect :) . The alarming bit is that I don't see the text at all in some cases unless I hover over where it should be. This is okay sometimes but could cause panic at other times.

That's probably because the color property of the selector is the same as the background-color property. For instance if the text color is black, the background-color is black, a white text shadow makes the text visible. If you remove that text shadow the text becomes unreadable.

That's probably because the color property of the selector is the same as the background-color property. For instance if the text color is black, the background-color is black, a white text shadow makes the text visible. If you remove that text shadow the text becomes unreadable.

That is fair enough. But just out of interest, how is "inactive" text selectively shadowed? Like the example I gave for the Find Toolbar. Or another example when one views a drop-down menu such as "Edit". If no content has been copied by Ctrl+C, the Paste options are shadowed. I'm asking because I'm not sure of how to get the info with the Domain Inspector.

that's the old code. use this instead (requires stylish):

#appcontent,
#content > tabbox > tabpanels {
  background-color: transparent !important;
}

#main-window[stylish-url="about:blank"]:not([onclose^="PrintUtils"]) #content browser { 
   opacity: 0 !important;
}

Awesome!! Thnx for the pointers!

That is fair enough. But just out of interest, how is "inactive" text selectively shadowed? Like the example I gave for the Find Toolbar. Or another example when one views a drop-down menu such as "Edit". If no content has been copied by Ctrl+C, the Paste options are shadowed. I'm asking because I'm not sure of how to get the info with the Domain Inspector.

They're using the [disabled = "true"] attribute. In the right panel of DOM Inspector choose Object - DOM Node. That will show you all the attributes of the chosen selector.

post-350326-0-18854500-1302271474.png

They're using the [disabled = "true"] attribute. In the right panel of DOM Inspector choose Object - DOM Node. That will show you all the attributes of the chosen selector.

...

Thanks for the pointer :)

So now I have:

* {text-shadow: none !important}
* [disabled="true"] {color:#555!important; font-weight: bold!important}

Looks like it's going to take me a lot more time before I can learn to use DOM Inspector for less obvious things :(

Anyone can help me out with these 2 problems ?

I have a weird line and i need to get rid of it

How to change the text color of on the "NEXT" button in the FIND BAR?

Re. the second one, this works for me:

#FindToolbar .findbar-find-next {color: green!important;}

Anyone can help me out with these 2 problems ?

I have a weird line and i need to get rid of it

How to change the text color of on the "NEXT" button in the FIND BAR?

#FindToolbar .findbar-find-next:not([disabled]) {
        color: red !important;
}

#navigator-toolbox::after {
	height: 0px !important; 
}

Thanks for the pointer :)

So now I have:

* {text-shadow: none !important}
* [disabled="true"] {color:#555!important; font-weight: bold!important}

Looks like it's going to take me a lot more time before I can learn to use DOM Inspector for less obvious things :(

* [disabled="true"] 

works, but you should use

*[disabled = "true"]

Re. the second one, this works for me:

#FindToolbar .findbar-find-next {color: green!important;}

#FindToolbar .findbar-find-next:not([disabled]) {
        color: red !important;
}

#navigator-toolbox::after {
	height: 0px !important; 
}

thank you both for the help ^^!

i also managed to figured out the text color for findbar "NEXT", "PREVIOUS" and "HIGHLIGHT" button !! :laugh:

#FindToolbar toolbarbutton:not([disabled]) {
    color: #fff !important;
}

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!