IE9 Will Be Faster and Safer than Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari


Recommended Posts

I am going to reserve judgment until ie9 comes out and I use it. Based on what we've seen so far with the platform previews it will be significantly faster than ie8 but not faster than chrome/opera/safari. It may be faster in some areas with its new graphics acceleration though. In real world usage the speed differences aren't really noticeable at all unless you are using super JS heavy web apps. I am more excited to see what they do with IE9's UI.

Seriously, reading some of the replies in this thread; it seems people hate Internet Explorer because it's Internet Explorer. Historically, it hasn't been fantastic, and it has been in more recent years eclipsed by Firefox and Chrome, but IE9 is the fastest and most secure browser there, choosing not to use it because it's IE is just, well, ridiculous. And seriously, stuff like 'hate', for an internet browser? That's some pretty strong emotions there. It's not like IE ran over your dog or something.

Keep an open mind guys.

Its IE guys, why bother! :laugh: :devil:

I am going to reserve judgment until ie9 comes out and I use it. Based on what we've seen so far with the platform previews it will be significantly faster than ie8 but not faster than chrome/opera/safari. It may be In real world usage the speed differences aren't really noticeable at all unless you are using super JS heavy web apps. I am more excited to see what they do with IE9's UI.

Exactly. It really boils down to personal preferences. I use them all, including IE, and they are all basically the same speed overall.

Saying Opera 10.6 if faster than Chrome 6 at this time in what? SunSpider? One benchmark does not the world make, we could just as well be debating who passes the Acid 3 test faster as well. You do know that both Opera and Chrome are just tweaking the hell out of their JS engines in order to leapfrog each other in SunSpider right? I mean, it's just specific to that one test, and the IE team hasn't done any of that sorta sunspider specific tweaking yet (they said as such a few times).

The point is that, if you only look at one test as the "defacto" one, then all devs have to do is tweak to hell for that specific test and then boast about how they're the fastest. None of that is really "real world" you could say, so the scores are really started to matter less and less IMO.

It's like the GPU makers tweaking their drivers to give them boosts for specific games over others, or even specific tests (futuremark etc).

  • 1 month later...

Microsoft and Mozilla are working on a real world benchmark suite, so Microsoft at least would be focusing on that.

Mozilla's still optimising around V8/SunSpider, but they're also doing it against other resource heavy JS scripts (like a NES emulator, or a fluid simulator, etc.)

I disagree with this, it seems IE constantly needs security patches, Chrome's sandbox seems to be more secure.

if you read the Chrome update changelogs, you'd realize that Chrome constantly needs security patches too. Also Chrome's sandbox is not really any better than IE8's protected mode (which is a sandbox too), provided you are on Win7.

if comparing Chrome to IE8 on Win7, I can see the claim of IE8 being the more secure browser having some merit.

however, for IE9, despite it being fastest on the IE9 test drive demos with its hardware acceleration, still sucks at Peacekeeper. I kinda wonder why...

Seriously, reading some of the replies in this thread; it seems people hate Internet Explorer because it's Internet Explorer. Historically, it hasn't been fantastic, and it has been in more recent years eclipsed by Firefox and Chrome, but IE9 is the fastest and most secure browser there, choosing not to use it because it's IE is just, well, ridiculous. And seriously, stuff like 'hate', for an internet browser? That's some pretty strong emotions there. It's not like IE ran over your dog or something.

Keep an open mind guys.

If you have done any sort of Web Developement then you have every right to hate IE.

most safest??

I cant trust a guy who cant get his grammar right.

Seriously, reading some of the replies in this thread; it seems people hate Internet Explorer because it's Internet Explorer. Historically, it hasn't been fantastic, and it has been in more recent years eclipsed by Firefox and Chrome, but IE9 is the fastest and most secure browser there, choosing not to use it because it's IE is just, well, ridiculous. And seriously, stuff like 'hate', for an internet browser? That's some pretty strong emotions there. It's not like IE ran over your dog or something.

Keep an open mind guys.

Seriously? (And these figures don't account for Chrome 7 which is even faster still)

IE9's GPU rendering modes are faster because those of Chrome and Firefox are still in development, but in overall performance, it's competitors still have a large lead

post-286512-12835157799861.jpg

Seriously? (And these figures don't account for Chrome 7 which is even faster still)

IE9's GPU rendering modes are faster because those of Chrome and Firefox are still in development, but in overall performance, it's competitors still have a large lead

Which version of the IE9 preview was that?

Wow, I didn't know Opera was still ahead of Chrome. I would have thought that Chrome would be well ahead of Opera by now in the performance department.

they are neck on neck, with different systems, you may see Opera or Chrome leading the race, both are getting faster and faster consistently.

I.E's security problem is and always is that Microsoft doesn't like issuing out of band security patches so Microsoft will usually only patch a security hole at the start of a month. Mozilla for instance would patch a hole as soon as they can. So I.E. is exposed to vulnerabilities for longer.

they are neck on neck, with different systems, you may see Opera or Chrome leading the race, both are getting faster and faster consistently.

That's also a comparison of the stable Chrome version vs. a pre-release of Opera. :p

Which version of the IE9 preview was that?

4, The last one released

Wow, I didn't know Opera was still ahead of Chrome. I would have thought that Chrome would be well ahead of Opera by now in the performance department.

To be honest, it's close enough to be within the margin of error, the performance of the 2 is very similar, in real world usage though, I find Chrome's cache management to be a bit better

That's also a comparison of the stable Chrome version vs. a pre-release of Opera. :p

10.6 and 10.7 are about the same in performance terms so it doesn't make an awful lot of difference to be honest

but IE9 is the fastest and most secure browser there,

Faster than what ? Browsers already released or in beta state ?

You do realise that by the time IE 9 will be relased new browsers will be out to compete against it. it's not like IE 9 will be released next week. Firefox team has lot of time to polish 4. Google will probably has the time to release 2 new versions of Chrome at this rate ...

I'm actually betting on MS this time. I like Chrome, it's my only browser, I hate FF because it takes much longer to start and it's a memory hog, but I really feel MS will do very well with IE9. They're attitude has changed in so many ways, and they're doing many good things (Windows 7, Bing, Windows Phone, etc.) lately. They won't go wrong with IE9, and yes, I dare to say that this will be a serious problem for other browser developers. :)

IE9 final won't be out for months, i'm sure there will be 2 or more public beta's, they won't just bugfix they will certainly improve performance during that time, IE9 won't be faster than chrome7 final but as long as its of a similar speed to firefox 4 final i'll be happy. Features and standards support is more important than speed. IE9 still has got a LONG way to go in regards to html5 standards support, their benchmarks and tables of supported features are heavily biased and in reality are the lowest of the modern browsers, they have several months to fix this though so i'm not that worried.

I love Chrome so much that it'll take a ****ing miracle to convince me to switch. Especially from Microsoft. Their track record (excluding Windows 7) has to be one of the worst in the industry to me, especially with that loudmouthed hothead Ballmer.

I lost all hope for Firefox since 3.6. It's still a decent browser, but it's behind-the-times and slow. I have tried the latest betas, and it's still slower than Chrome. Plus, it takes longer to start and I hate having to depend on extensions for functionality that Chrome made standard (searching from the address bar, better form auto-fill, etc). As with IE, Mozilla is pretty much dead-in-the-water unless they can come up with something revolutionary.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!