People sue Apple over 'overheating' iPads


Recommended Posts

(ArsTechnica) -- Three iPad users claim that because the iPad will shut itself off after remaining in direct sunlight for long enough, it fails to meet the promises Apple made about using the device as an e-book reader.

The group has filed a federal class-action lawsuit in the Northern California district to "redress and end this pattern of unlawful conduct."

When the iPad's operating temperature reaches a critical level, it will force itself to shut down and display a message warning the user to let the device cool down before trying use it again. This warning is the same that iPhones and iPod Touches give before shutting down when they overheat, often after being left in direct sunlight.

The lawsuit alleges that the iPad "does not live up to reasonable consumer's expectations created by Apple insofar as the iPad overheats so quickly under common weather conditions." Apple lists the iPad's operating temperature as 32? to 95? F (0? to 35? C), so it's not hard to see that using it out in the hot sun can quickly heat up the device over the maximum temperature.

The plaintiffs seem to take particular issue with Apple claiming that "reading on the iPad is just like reading a book." This claim is patently false, according to the lawsuit, because a real book can be used in "the sunlight or other normal environmental conditions" without shutting off.

Most consumer electronic devices can be damaged from overheating if used in direct sunlight for long periods of time; not all of them have the automatic shutoff capability that the iPad does.

more

Yawn, old joke is old

But seriously, if the device overheated and stopped working they wouldn't be happy would they? There is no middle ground with some people

I don't think they'll be happy if that happens. Most other electronics work fine in direct sunlight without overheating, so they probably expected the same from the iPad.

I don't see how they'll win this lawsuit. The iPad has pretty clear operating temperatures, going above that is at your own risk.

ANY electronic device with overheat protection sensor (pdas, e-readers, smartphones, etc.) WILL shut down when you leave it for more than 5 minutes under direct sunlight when it's 35 degrees Celsius outside, even a well-ventilated laptop will fail if you leave it to process something heavy for 20 minutes while in the sunlight.

Now... the fact is that we live in a lawyer's world... and if you have money, some lawyer will come after you... and Apple have tons of money, so... an unfortunate situation, because most of that money would be better used if it would ends up in the pockets of engineers and scientists instead of the pockets of lawyers. I am not against lawyers, they are an important part of any civilization, but today we have an extreme situation, this is why nobody want to be an engineer or a scientist anymore, but hey... everybody want to be a lawyer... the big problem is, lawyers make the law, so we simply can't reverse this trend until it revers itself, and it will reverse itself only when there would be less money to take from the productive, and this will be soon, because we will stay in this super-recession for a long long time.

You can expect more and more lawsuits against Apple, Microsoft, Intel, IBM... exactly because they are productive (that is why they have money), they serve the market well even in this time of recession, we should learn from them, not fight them, not make them weaker by confiscating some of their profit because we find a line or two in the law, which makes that possible.

At the end... if you don't like the iPad, don't buy it, if you already bought it, ask for a full refund, or simply sell it on ebay, you really don't need to sue a company because you are not 100% satisfied with its product, grow up, that is what we call real life.

Here we go again. Last year, the complaint was the 3GS melting in the sun. This year it's the iPad shutting off under these temperatures. What do they expect? A few degrees higher and you have some people dying from the heat. Oh well. I had my 3GS and my iPad under direct sun at the beach in Punta Cana this year. Both are perfectly fine.

There's something called "shade", they should look into it. I doubt that many people stay out in the hot, searing sun for longer than 15 minutes just to read a book.

What about the beach?

Or laying out by the pool? Both seem to me some of the most probable places to find people publicly reading books/magazines. You seem like the type that doesn't get out much.

Or laying out by the pool? Both seem to me some of the most probable places to find people publicly reading books/magazines. You seem like the type that doesn't get out much.

I love the iPad's screen, but if you can read it comfortably in direct sunlight, you're some sort of superhuman. Some shade is almost a necessity. Good thing shade also doubles as a way to keep the iPad from overheating...and also from you getting skin cancer. :p

I think this quote is missing from at least one of the plaintiff's:

I am an absolute moron, and I cannot make anything of myself, so I am suing a big company to get money.

As everyone pointed out, if you want to read it outside then, you should find some shade and read comfortably. Not only is it bad for your eyes otherwise, but it's bad for any electronic device to get very hot.

Hopefully the suers are sterilized afterward.

I love the iPad's screen, but if you can read it comfortably in direct sunlight, you're some sort of superhuman. Some shade is almost a necessity. Good thing shade also doubles as a way to keep the iPad from overheating...and also from you getting skin cancer. :p

The screen can be very difficult to see under the direct sunlight (especially when you're close to the equator :p). I used my iPhone and iPad while out by the pool and beach to talk to my family via Skype while on vacation, since it was the one of the few places I could get a wifi signal at the resort. In any case, the longest I would use them would be for close to an hour, since my fianc?e and I made a few calls in a row consecutively back to the states. Never had any issues. The heat peaked at 99 degrees on some days, too.

If what they say is true, then their lawsuit has some sort of merit...But in all honesty, these guys should have known better than to get an ipad to read in direct sunlight! Should have just got a proper e-ink ebook reader.

The screen can be very difficult to see under the direct sunlight (especially when you're close to the equator :p). I used my iPhone and iPad while out by the pool and beach to talk to my family via Skype while on vacation, since it was the one of the few places I could get a wifi signal at the resort. In any case, the longest I would use them would be for close to an hour, since my fianc?e and I made a few calls in a row consecutively back to the states. Never had any issues. The heat peaked at 99 degrees on some days, too.

One third of the year in Arizona the average temperature is 99 degrees or higher. ;D But whatever, seems like a realistic gripe that these people are suing over. If apple claims that reading the ipad in normal circumstances is the equivalent to reading a book it is obviously not. You have to remember that most people are computer retarded and when apple sells them something without explicitly stating the circumstances in which it will operate or even the opposite - equating it to something that will operate under all extremes regardless of 'reasonable use' factor then people can file suit for it.

There's other ways that an ipad isn't like an actual book either, Perhaps Apple can be sued for each way!

For example, if I get my book wet, I can just dry it out and continue reading it. I'm not sure that an ipad will allow me to do that.

I can put a book into a microwave and will still be able to read it afterwards, probably not so with an ipad.

I'm sure that there's other differences too.

Lol. Stupid people buying stupid things they don't need or understand, and then expect stupid things from it. Lawsuit should be thrown out. No sympathy for people who just blindly get whatever a company puts out without doing any research on how and why it should be used.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Yup, that's a doozy right there 😄
    • It's a bundle of tools created by a variety of people, so things can go wrong sometimes. It's a great addition to Windows, and I use a lot of the tools on a daily basis. Also, it's still a 0.**** release so quick updates are to be expected 😉
    • Oh, I did. And it's even worse than I was hoping! Besides a lot of techno-babble jargon (yes I understand 100% of it but it's still all just techno-babble) there's 2 key points that make me super-weary about even considering testing this out. -- By default, after installation, a relay is automatically set up, so you do not need to care about that. * Non-chatmail apps use email servers as a long-term message archive while chatmail clients use email servers for ephemeral instant message relay. * Supporting the full variety of classic email setups would require considerable development and maintenance efforts, and complicate making chatmail-based messaging more resilient, reliable and fast. -- Basically, the end-user device is the 'server' (relay) so there is NO ARCHIVING whatsoever because every message is necessarily ephemeral. Great for techno-paranoia (and for illicit activities preferring no tracks to cover) but terrible for everybody else. It's also ironically contradictory to engineering principles of redundancies besides the transport layers due to the explicit absence of any persistent storage. Instead of 'classic email address' retaining multi-GB messaging archives on its server, now every device must retain 100% of those storage demands. (Email messages were originally meant to be short correspondences, not the multi-MB attachments boondoggle that now exists with unlimited spam engines flooding every potential recipient.) Any device swap or reset (or loss) makes the entire message history go bye-bye forever... lest there's an off-device auto-archival "relay" mechanism that's really a separate server that holds onto all transported messages (an email server) that utilizes 'chatmail email address' identities (like an email server) and its own persistent storage archive (like an email server). But... this solution is hoping to exist alongside real-world email address identities (based on the email server relay pathway) but simply render messages in chat thread format in an ephemeral manner (with contents being encrypted, and messages auto-expiring) ... In the end, it's a chat app/experience for the Web3/P2P-at-all-costs zealots. (I have accts on all sorts of federated web3 services so I understand the technical and non-technical alike.) For any practical users, however, it's just another service to download/install, register, cross-share id cards/qr codes, but know that there's no history/archive whatsoever (by design) so no account/message recovery whatsoever... update the device, install a bummed update patch, or dare upgrade your device... all history, poof, gone. Ya gotta start everything over again like they're a brand new person.
    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!