Shotty, another screenshot tool for Vista/7


Recommended Posts

Windows: Shotty is a lightweight and portable screen capture tool that captures screenshots in Windows Vista and 7 while preserving the transparency of Aero-Glass effects.

If all you need is to capture windows with the transparency intact, Shotty does a great job. On top of eye-candy preserving capture, however, it also includes a built-in editor for easy highlighting and annotation. Shotty has support for easy screenshot sharing via quick uploads to popular image sharing services like ImageShack and TwitPic.

It comes packaged in an installer but you can opt to install it as a system or portable application. Shotty is freeware, Windows only.

Download

(via Lifehacker)

It works. Grabs the Aero-Glass and the shadow as well. It's pretty clever how it works, it puts a background behind the window, and takes two screenshots, once on a black background, and once with a white background. It compares the two screenshots to calculate the transparency.

It captures layered windows as well by clicking the tray icon (windows behind other windows), though these won't have the Aero-Glass effect.

You may have to run the program as administrator to take screenshots of certain processes.

post-57213-12804500799854.png

It works. Grabs the Aero-Glass and the shadow as well. It's pretty clever how it works, it puts a background behind the window, and takes two screenshots, once on a black background, and once with a white background. It compares the two screenshots to calculate the transparency.

It captures layered windows as well by clicking the tray icon (windows behind other windows), though these won't have the Aero-Glass effect.

You may have to run the program as administrator to take screenshots of certain processes.

post-57213-12804500799854.png

I can do the same thing with printscreen and mspaint :wacko:

I can do the same thing with printscreen and mspaint :wacko:

I think you're misunderstanding. Shotty creates alpha-transparent PNGs. Any other method won't do that.

Shotty = Transparency (Notice how you can see the checkered background through the aero-glass)

post-57213-12804532718352.png

Print screen + MSPaint = No Transparency (Notice how you CAN'T see the checkered background through the aero-glass)

post-57213-1280453299527.png

I think you're misunderstanding. Shotty creates alpha-transparent PNGs. Any other method won't do that.

Oh, I thought you meant being able to see the background through aero in the picture you take LOL.

I was like clearly I'm seeing things, because according to this picture that I just took, I can see my wallpaper.

Thanks for clearing that up.

I don't get why Windows doesn't do this out of the box like Mac OS X. Taking screen shots in Windows is pretty ****ty.

It takes screenshots exactly like Mac OS X does. It just doesn't have alpha-transparency like Xinok pointed out.

Now I don't think OSX has any major transparency in the GUI, so you can't really compare the two.

It takes screenshots exactly like Mac OS X does. It just doesn't have alpha-transparency like Xinok pointed out.

Now I don't think OSX has any major transparency in the GUI, so you can't really compare the two.

No? How would you describe this then?

screenshot20100730at035.png

screenshot20100730at035r.png

screenshot20100730at040.png

Seems to me Mac OS X does transparency quite good when taking screen shots... Please do tell me how exactly can't you compare the two?

No? How would you describe this:

Seems to me Mac OS X does transparency quite good when taking screen shots... Please do tell me how exactly can't you compare the two?

I did say I don't think it did ;) So I guess I was wrong.

Also, Windows will maintain the transparency so it will show w/e is behind the window you're taking a screenshot of. It just doesn't support alpha-transparency. Not exactly a major deal-breaker.

I did say I don't think it did ;) So I guess I was wrong.

Also, Windows will maintain the transparency so it will show w/e is behind the window you're taking a screenshot of. It just doesn't support alpha-transparency. Not exactly a major deal-breaker.

I think it's pretty poor for a 2010 operating system. But oh well, Microsoft just is a bit slow when it comes to stuff like this.

I think it's pretty poor for a 2010 operating system. But oh well, Microsoft just is a bit slow when it comes to stuff like this.

I'm sure they figure that it doesn't matter to 99% of their userbase. Like any company they invest their resources where they will get the best return on that investment. Something as minor as this would be nice to have, but doesn't even cross the mind of the majority of people, me included.

For those that do care there is the app posted in this thread to fill the void :)

I'm sure they figure that it doesn't matter to 99% of their userbase. Like any company they invest their resources where they will get the best return on that investment. Something as minor as this would be nice to have, but doesn't even cross the mind of the majority of people, me included.

For those that do care there is the app posted in this thread to fill the void :)

It's all in the details. And you'd be surprised how many Mac OS X users use this feature. Hell, even my mom uses it from time to time when corresponding with her friends.

A much smaller company like Apple is able to implement this without asking, yet Microsoft has to divert valuable resources? Sure...

I'm sure they figure that it doesn't matter to 99% of their userbase.

The concept of transparency in an image manipulation program is quite new to a lot of Windows users, they won't know what to do with transparency ("what the heck is this checkerboard doing in my image???"), and MSpaint doesn't even show transparency..

It's all in the details. And you'd be surprised how many Mac OS X users use this feature. Hell, even my mom uses it from time to time when corresponding with her friends.

It's funny though you should bring that up btw. Apparently Apple is capable of doing so, yet Microsoft isn't? Right.

Your mum uses alpha transparency? With what exactly?

I honestly cannot say this was something I looked for. Hell I didn't even know the difference until like 20mins ago =/

And who cares if Apple is able to do it? There are many things Windows does that OSX doesn't, and the same applies vice-verca.

MSpaint doesn't even show transparency..

MSPaint on 7 does show transparency, it just can't save it.

MSPaint on 7 does show transparency, it just can't save it.

I can't seem to get it to do this. All transparency just turns white, and I can't manipulate the alpha. Is that what you meant? I meant support along the lines of Paint.NET.

Of course, I realize that in order to to be able to edit the alpha meaningfully, MSPaint would have to support layers. This is another jump in complexity for most users.

Your mum uses alpha transparency? With what exactly?

PowerPoint / Keynote presentations, Word / Pages documents etc. Not all backgrounds are just plain white you know... It also has to do with the fact Mac OS X sees most UI elements as different layers in the progress. Not just alpha transparency.

And who cares if Apple is able to do it? There are many things Windows does that OSX doesn't, and the same applies vice-verca.

You're the one coming up with some revenue / investment story.

MSPaint on 7 does show transparency, it just can't save it.

How convenient.

I don't get why Windows doesn't do this out of the box like Mac OS X. Taking screen shots in Windows is pretty ****ty.

And why doesn't Mac OS X do [feature] that [Windows, Linux] can do out of the box?

Because Windows is not Mac OS X, and Mac OS X is not Windows.

PowerPoint / Keynote presentations, Word / Pages documents etc. Not all backgrounds are just plain white you know... It also has to do with the fact Mac OS X sees most UI elements as different layers in the progress. Not just alpha transparency.

Cool? I honestly cannot say I care, and I'm probably betting that 99% of windows users don't care either. I don't go around taking screenshots of windows and posting them in powerpoint presentations or word documents.

And even if I did, it wouldn't be that big a deal if I couldn't make a window transparent so I can see whats below it.

You're the one coming up with some revenue / investment story.

Excuse me? That made no sense what so ever. And if you bothered to check it wasn't me who said anything about that ;)

How convenient.

Yes because a very basic image editor that is really only used for saving a screenshot or to make a funny edit, must have support for layers, alpha transparency, etc right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Thanks
    • I actually got to use one of those so called "backup codes" once. It was for a customer, I choose the backup code option, and by the grace of god, they actually hade them printed out. Imagine my surprise, when after using the backup code, Google then told use we had to enter a code they just sent to the gmail address we currently did not have access to. I was not amused, Google backup codes should be the end all get out of jail free card, because you had to have access to the account to even get them.
    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!