Shotty, another screenshot tool for Vista/7


Recommended Posts

Windows: Shotty is a lightweight and portable screen capture tool that captures screenshots in Windows Vista and 7 while preserving the transparency of Aero-Glass effects.

If all you need is to capture windows with the transparency intact, Shotty does a great job. On top of eye-candy preserving capture, however, it also includes a built-in editor for easy highlighting and annotation. Shotty has support for easy screenshot sharing via quick uploads to popular image sharing services like ImageShack and TwitPic.

It comes packaged in an installer but you can opt to install it as a system or portable application. Shotty is freeware, Windows only.

Download

(via Lifehacker)

It works. Grabs the Aero-Glass and the shadow as well. It's pretty clever how it works, it puts a background behind the window, and takes two screenshots, once on a black background, and once with a white background. It compares the two screenshots to calculate the transparency.

It captures layered windows as well by clicking the tray icon (windows behind other windows), though these won't have the Aero-Glass effect.

You may have to run the program as administrator to take screenshots of certain processes.

post-57213-12804500799854.png

It works. Grabs the Aero-Glass and the shadow as well. It's pretty clever how it works, it puts a background behind the window, and takes two screenshots, once on a black background, and once with a white background. It compares the two screenshots to calculate the transparency.

It captures layered windows as well by clicking the tray icon (windows behind other windows), though these won't have the Aero-Glass effect.

You may have to run the program as administrator to take screenshots of certain processes.

post-57213-12804500799854.png

I can do the same thing with printscreen and mspaint :wacko:

I can do the same thing with printscreen and mspaint :wacko:

I think you're misunderstanding. Shotty creates alpha-transparent PNGs. Any other method won't do that.

Shotty = Transparency (Notice how you can see the checkered background through the aero-glass)

post-57213-12804532718352.png

Print screen + MSPaint = No Transparency (Notice how you CAN'T see the checkered background through the aero-glass)

post-57213-1280453299527.png

I think you're misunderstanding. Shotty creates alpha-transparent PNGs. Any other method won't do that.

Oh, I thought you meant being able to see the background through aero in the picture you take LOL.

I was like clearly I'm seeing things, because according to this picture that I just took, I can see my wallpaper.

Thanks for clearing that up.

I don't get why Windows doesn't do this out of the box like Mac OS X. Taking screen shots in Windows is pretty ****ty.

It takes screenshots exactly like Mac OS X does. It just doesn't have alpha-transparency like Xinok pointed out.

Now I don't think OSX has any major transparency in the GUI, so you can't really compare the two.

It takes screenshots exactly like Mac OS X does. It just doesn't have alpha-transparency like Xinok pointed out.

Now I don't think OSX has any major transparency in the GUI, so you can't really compare the two.

No? How would you describe this then?

screenshot20100730at035.png

screenshot20100730at035r.png

screenshot20100730at040.png

Seems to me Mac OS X does transparency quite good when taking screen shots... Please do tell me how exactly can't you compare the two?

No? How would you describe this:

Seems to me Mac OS X does transparency quite good when taking screen shots... Please do tell me how exactly can't you compare the two?

I did say I don't think it did ;) So I guess I was wrong.

Also, Windows will maintain the transparency so it will show w/e is behind the window you're taking a screenshot of. It just doesn't support alpha-transparency. Not exactly a major deal-breaker.

I did say I don't think it did ;) So I guess I was wrong.

Also, Windows will maintain the transparency so it will show w/e is behind the window you're taking a screenshot of. It just doesn't support alpha-transparency. Not exactly a major deal-breaker.

I think it's pretty poor for a 2010 operating system. But oh well, Microsoft just is a bit slow when it comes to stuff like this.

I think it's pretty poor for a 2010 operating system. But oh well, Microsoft just is a bit slow when it comes to stuff like this.

I'm sure they figure that it doesn't matter to 99% of their userbase. Like any company they invest their resources where they will get the best return on that investment. Something as minor as this would be nice to have, but doesn't even cross the mind of the majority of people, me included.

For those that do care there is the app posted in this thread to fill the void :)

I'm sure they figure that it doesn't matter to 99% of their userbase. Like any company they invest their resources where they will get the best return on that investment. Something as minor as this would be nice to have, but doesn't even cross the mind of the majority of people, me included.

For those that do care there is the app posted in this thread to fill the void :)

It's all in the details. And you'd be surprised how many Mac OS X users use this feature. Hell, even my mom uses it from time to time when corresponding with her friends.

A much smaller company like Apple is able to implement this without asking, yet Microsoft has to divert valuable resources? Sure...

I'm sure they figure that it doesn't matter to 99% of their userbase.

The concept of transparency in an image manipulation program is quite new to a lot of Windows users, they won't know what to do with transparency ("what the heck is this checkerboard doing in my image???"), and MSpaint doesn't even show transparency..

It's all in the details. And you'd be surprised how many Mac OS X users use this feature. Hell, even my mom uses it from time to time when corresponding with her friends.

It's funny though you should bring that up btw. Apparently Apple is capable of doing so, yet Microsoft isn't? Right.

Your mum uses alpha transparency? With what exactly?

I honestly cannot say this was something I looked for. Hell I didn't even know the difference until like 20mins ago =/

And who cares if Apple is able to do it? There are many things Windows does that OSX doesn't, and the same applies vice-verca.

MSpaint doesn't even show transparency..

MSPaint on 7 does show transparency, it just can't save it.

MSPaint on 7 does show transparency, it just can't save it.

I can't seem to get it to do this. All transparency just turns white, and I can't manipulate the alpha. Is that what you meant? I meant support along the lines of Paint.NET.

Of course, I realize that in order to to be able to edit the alpha meaningfully, MSPaint would have to support layers. This is another jump in complexity for most users.

Your mum uses alpha transparency? With what exactly?

PowerPoint / Keynote presentations, Word / Pages documents etc. Not all backgrounds are just plain white you know... It also has to do with the fact Mac OS X sees most UI elements as different layers in the progress. Not just alpha transparency.

And who cares if Apple is able to do it? There are many things Windows does that OSX doesn't, and the same applies vice-verca.

You're the one coming up with some revenue / investment story.

MSPaint on 7 does show transparency, it just can't save it.

How convenient.

I don't get why Windows doesn't do this out of the box like Mac OS X. Taking screen shots in Windows is pretty ****ty.

And why doesn't Mac OS X do [feature] that [Windows, Linux] can do out of the box?

Because Windows is not Mac OS X, and Mac OS X is not Windows.

PowerPoint / Keynote presentations, Word / Pages documents etc. Not all backgrounds are just plain white you know... It also has to do with the fact Mac OS X sees most UI elements as different layers in the progress. Not just alpha transparency.

Cool? I honestly cannot say I care, and I'm probably betting that 99% of windows users don't care either. I don't go around taking screenshots of windows and posting them in powerpoint presentations or word documents.

And even if I did, it wouldn't be that big a deal if I couldn't make a window transparent so I can see whats below it.

You're the one coming up with some revenue / investment story.

Excuse me? That made no sense what so ever. And if you bothered to check it wasn't me who said anything about that ;)

How convenient.

Yes because a very basic image editor that is really only used for saving a screenshot or to make a funny edit, must have support for layers, alpha transparency, etc right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!