Shotty, another screenshot tool for Vista/7


Recommended Posts

Come on guys, enough of the OS wars.

Awesome! Thanks for the heads up, rm20010. I've been looking for a free alternative to Window Clippings for a long time.

Definitely. I still have the last 'freeware' copy of Window Clippings installed.

www.localhostruploadr.com

Still use localhostr uploadr (except when stuff refuses to upload :p), but I'd like to have the option of keeping some offline screenshots ;)

It's all in the details. And you'd be surprised how many Mac OS X users use this feature.

Not really, I bet it's just as low a percentage as I imagine.

and MSpaint doesn't even show transparency..

Unlike OS X Paint which, oh wait, there is no OS X Paint. Most graphics software for Windows support alpha levels just fine. I guess the notable exception is Visual Studio, which still doesn't support it in 2010.

Now I do think that Windows should ship with slightly better screenshot tools, as I don't think the snipping tool is that great, but I don't think the ability to preserve transparency of window borders really has that much value. It's a neat trick, but not much more. If you could take transparent grabs of child windows and elements within windows then maybe that would have slightly more value, but there are architectural limitation in Windows that prevent this from being feasible. There's no such thing as a transparent child window for instance, and a common way to create the appearance of this is for the child window to actually ask the parent to paint its background. The design of the Windows APIs stems from the 1980s, and various functionality has just been jury rigged over the years. It's easy to say that things should be easy to add just because Microsoft is so big, but reality isn't like that.

No need for a third-party app to do this. PrtScrn and MS Paint does a good enough job.

Oh, and to Neo:

It's ****ty for a 2010 OS to not support transparency--especially when it was a selling point for the previous version it's based on--but it's also ****ty that we still have to defragment, maintain a healthy registry and deal with virus scanners. :(

Yes because a very basic image editor that is really only used for saving a screenshot or to make a funny edit, must have support for layers, alpha transparency, etc right?

We're not in the 90s anymore, so yes it should have support for alpha transparency. I'm not saying anything about layers and such so I have no idea where that comes from. However, alpha transparency isn't exactly considered an advanced feature anymore these days.

Excuse me? That made no sense what so ever. And if you bothered to check it wasn't me who said anything about that ;)

My bad! I looked wrong. :)

has anyone compared this to winsnap? and if so which do you like more/

It's about the same thing as WinSnap. Just too lazy to install this as well. :D

EDIT: it's sweeter than WinSnap.

No need for a third-party app to do this. PrtScrn and MS Paint does a good enough job.

MSPaint and PrtScrn is just too much of a hassle. With WinSnap and this you just press PrntScrn and the file is saved to your HDD as a .png file, with transparency. Can't be any faster than 1 key press.

We're not in the 90s anymore, so yes it should have support for alpha transparency. I'm not saying anything about layers and such so I have no idea where that comes from. However, alpha transparency isn't exactly considered an advanced feature anymore these days.

Still not what paint was designed for. Hell my little brother uses it for drawing silly pictures. If you want more features go get paint.net, gimp (which are free) or go get photoshop (which is paid).

I don't see why Microsoft should add features for a program that really has no need for alpha transparency or anything more than just saving basic screenshots and drawing squiggles

Still not what paint was designed for. Hell my little brother uses it for drawing silly pictures. If you want more features go get paint.net, gimp (which are free) or go get photoshop (which is paid).

I don't see why Microsoft should add features for a program that really has no need for alpha transparency or anything more than just saving basic screenshots and drawing squiggles

If it supports file types such as PNG I don't see why it shouldn't support transparency as well, seems a bit weird. Just wondering, does Windows 7 have another application build-in similar to Mac OS X' Preview?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preview_(software)

so you're running yet another program in the background juste to have transparency!?

thx... I'll pass

they only ppl I'd see to be interested in this is web developers to show software screenshots (looks more professional on a website). that's it.

very nice program tho...!

If it supports file types such as PNG I don't see why it shouldn't support transparency as well, seems a bit weird. Just wondering, does Windows 7 have another application build-in similar to Mac OS X' Preview?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preview_(software)

Yes. 2 in fact:

- Windows Photo viewer (included natively)

- Windows live gallery (more advanced version of photo viewer, has support for facial recognition etc but you have to download it)

PDF cannot be viewed natively in Windows since Adobe sued Microsoft a while back.

Live Gallery is more like iPhoto. Windows doesn't have any built-in stuff that allows basic manipulation, if that's what he means. It has Windows Photo Viewer for viewing images (any format you have a codec installed for), and Explorer's preview pane for previewing arbitrary formats (which will show any format you have support installed for):

egrdj4.png

Windows and OS X are simply different, and I already explained why transparency is a complicated issue in Windows and not something that can be added without fundamentally redesigning Windows.

It's ****ty for a 2010 OS to not support transparency--especially when it was a selling point for the previous version it's based on--but it's also ****ty that we still have to defragment, maintain a healthy registry and deal with virus scanners. :(

No, you don't have to defragment, or worry about a healthy registry with Vista/7. Vista/7 automatically defragments once a week, and modern Windows versions use registry virtualization to make sure Windows no longer slows down even if you use it for years without reinstalling. And MSE is a lightweight and hassle free AV which does its job very well.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!