Recommended Posts

ahhhhhh...

well C1PR1ONE.. tell me this

if i change this png.. as in make it completely different

where else does this png go??

is it only for right click menu or is it used elsewhere?

if I right click on desktop not only appears in firefox

the png is problem

create another. png and goes

This is a great theme :D.... But I have a small problem, I have used the uxtheme patcher both the x64 and the x86 patcher.. The theme itself works... I replaced the Explorerframe.dll in SysWow64, but when I replace the Explorerframe.dll in the system32 folder explorer.exe wont start when windows starts. Im I doing anything wrong?

I had that issue before, but I couldn't do certain things in explorer.

Then I realised, you aren't supposed to change the ExplorerFrame.dll in the SysWOW64 folder. Only change then System32 ExplorerFrame.dll

well it wont work if u copy explorerframe.dll to both system32 & syswow64 folders

they are 2 diff files that need to be edited

so what i do is i open a resource hacker copy the bitmap folder from system32 explorerframe.dll then replace syswow64 explorerframe.dll bitmaps

no problems

I had that issue before, but I couldn't do certain things in explorer.

Then I realised, you aren't supposed to change the ExplorerFrame.dll in the SysWOW64 folder. Only change then System32 ExplorerFrame.dll

Tried that, it didn't work...

well it wont work if u copy explorerframe.dll to both system32 & syswow64 folders

they are 2 diff files that need to be edited

so what i do is i open a resource hacker copy the bitmap folder from system32 explorerframe.dll then replace syswow64 explorerframe.dll bitmaps

no problems

There is a 64bit and a 32bit explorerframe.dll included with the theme... but I will try your solution thanks... :)

you don't need to change the syswow64 version, you should never have to change that version

only change the one in system32

wanna bet ?

if you save something in google chrome the back/forward buttons are set to windows default

thats one of the reason for replacing syswow64 explorerframe.dll

well it wont work if u copy explorerframe.dll to both system32 & syswow64 folders

they are 2 diff files that need to be edited

so what i do is i open a resource hacker copy the bitmap folder from system32 explorerframe.dll then replace syswow64 explorerframe.dll bitmaps

no problems

I replaced the bitmaps in the 32bit explorerframe.dll and no errors on startup this time, but I didn't see any changes to the back buttons.... Im now using the orginal explorerframe.dll together with the Blend theme, it still looks good :cool: . I don't wanna spent more time on getting the explorerframe.dlll to work :p Anyway thanks for your help

I replaced it as instructed....here's how it looks in firefox now.

blend2p.jpg

strange...after I applied the fix and saved and rebooted it locked me out of my system...

I was only able to get back in by going into 'safe mode' and changing the theme to something else

and then replacing with the original Blend 2.0 files.

any thoughts on that Zain ? or did I do something wrong when saving the file?

did u replace it with the SHIFT key?

im sorry.

u replaced it just fine.. mayb it saved wrong or something..

its a little darker but thats what i had to do to fix the problem..

guys is it fine?? i mean should i repack the theme with this fix?

yes I used the 'shift' key as instructed Zain.

it appeared to save the theme successfully and asked did I want to apply...to which I said yes.

it was only after the reboot that the problem surfaced...very strange indeed...only seems to happen when I replace an image.

the first release of Blend 2.0 Beta doesn't appear to have the firefox problem though Zain...

did you change something from that version to the Final version?

screenshot shows Firefox with original Blend 2.0 Beta running...

blend2beta.jpg

obviously i had to make a button with round corners for blend 2.0

the problem is that i can make an opaque one.

but it wont go with the rest of the buttons in the theme... thats my only concern. anyhow if it works im gona pack the theme with that file and update it.. and u guys can let me know if it works.. ill post here when i update it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!