Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Recently I've been kind of pushed into the idea of buying an MBP for the first time in my life. I'm currently studying Computer Science and therefore doing lots of programming/designining work and every time I've had the chance to play a little bit with Mac OS X I've personally loved it. More than anything this MBP would be used to take it to College, work on programming/designing and maybe a game here and there every once in a while, at most World of Warcraft. I'd be buying the 13' C2D model, can't really afford the 15' ones and higher models, but the normal MacBook doesn't convince me either.

So, I know I kinda made my own research, but, in general, how pleased are you from moving from PC/Win7 Laptop to a MBP or Mac OS X in general?

Also, since I currently live in Costa Rica and I'm going to Texas to visit some friends and do some shopping, I could order from Apple and have it sent to my friends house, but, I was thinking on buying it from BestBuy hoping I could get the taxes off, since I'm leaving after a week and also try and get a student discount. Would this be possible or am I asking too much?

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/927418-should-i-buy-an-mbp/
Share on other sites

I agree with Killa. Plus, if you're programming and you're worrying about money, you should know how to get a PC and make it a hackingtosh you'll save tons. Also, if you don't live in California,Tenesee Or New Jersey you can order your laptop from newegg.com and you won't be charged any sales tax (plus some offer free shipping!). On a last note, nothing says that you're a programmer / computer whiz more than having OSX on a PC.

I would personally go for a PC it's just better performance for the buck, this includes the drivers for your video card that will run your games a lot better than on a MAC.

I agree with Killa. Plus, if you're programming and you're worrying about money, you should know how to get a PC and make it a hackingtosh you'll save tons. Also, if you don't live in California,Tenesee Or New Jersey you can order your laptop from newegg.com and you won't be charged any sales tax (plus some offer free shipping!). On a last note, nothing says that you're a programmer / computer whiz more than having OSX on a PC.

I would personally go for a PC it's just better performance for the buck, this includes the drivers for your video card that will run your games a lot better than on a MAC.

true, plus the 17'' starts at $1399 and has a ATI Radeon 5850 http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/computer_can_series.do?storeName=computer_store&category=notebooks&a1=Category&v1=ENVY&a2=Screen+size&v2=Over+16.9&series_name=ENVY17_series&a1=Category&v1=ENVY&a2=Screen+size&v2=Over+16.9

I was also in university for computer science and I was given the choice to buy a laptop for school. I went with the Macbook Pro. I just graduated a month or two ago, so back then, it was not the unibody Macbook Pro's. Nowadays, the unibody Macbook Pro is a great choice. I got my old one replaced with the unibody for free on AppleCare because they broke my old one in a third repair (the old MBP was the one riddled with known problems).

In terms of usage, I would not trade in Mac OS X for anything else. It increased my productivity two-fold and I have since grown to love Mac OS X. I still use Windows when necessary and Linux for servers, but they cannot hold a candle to Mac OS for customization of one's own workflow in day-to-day use. I would say the transition to Mac OS was fairly easy and everything just seemed to make more sense than in Windows; just have to keep an open mind about trying new things. I am quite content with keeping my Mac completely Windows-free. Typically, Mac OS has more polished applications, consistent UI's with excellent integration with features of the OS and Finder which is something I find impossible to find in Windows. The Pro line has the power necessary to keep up with my uses and I have had no need to upgrade to a higher model.

Build quality on the new Macbook Pro's are great.

Hope that helps!

Student discount and taxes off at Best buy? Not happening. I know Apple has student discounts but ONLINE. The Macbook Pro is great but I like the bigger LCD sizes. I am a Windows fanboy so I would prefer Windows 7 over OS X.

I know I can get the taxes off, but I wonder which one would be worth more, the $100 student discount or the taxes off. I'll have to see.

I was also in university for computer science and I was given the choice to buy a laptop for school. I went with the Macbook Pro. I just graduated a month or two ago, so back then, it was not the unibody Macbook Pro's. Nowadays, the unibody Macbook Pro is a great choice. I got my old one replaced with the unibody for free on AppleCare because they broke my old one in a third repair (the old MBP was the one riddled with known problems).

In terms of usage, I would not trade in Mac OS X for anything else. It increased my productivity two-fold and I have since grown to love Mac OS X. I still use Windows when necessary and Linux for servers, but they cannot hold a candle to Mac OS for customization of one's own workflow in day-to-day use. I would say the transition to Mac OS was fairly easy and everything just seemed to make more sense than in Windows; just have to keep an open mind about trying new things. I am quite content with keeping my Mac completely Windows-free. Typically, Mac OS has more polished applications, consistent UI's with excellent integration with features of the OS and Finder which is something I find impossible to find in Windows. The Pro line has the power necessary to keep up with my uses and I have had no need to upgrade to a higher model.

Build quality on the new Macbook Pro's are great.

Hope that helps!

Pretty much how it seems everyone feels and it's what I want to feel, it seems like it's just so much more productive, with Windows I just spend my time looking for a decent app to do things or end up taking twice the time to do something just cause I have to open tons of things and move everything around to do 1 thing, when I see in videos of Mac OS X things are more intuitive. I guess I'm not going wrong with that! I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

So, I know I kinda made my own research, but, in general, how pleased are you from moving from PC/Win7 Laptop to a MBP or Mac OS X in general?

I got the same 13' MBP last summer and I love it. It's a great piece of hardware. I am running Mac OS X and have Win 7 installed on Virtual Box due to couple of apps that I ran at work, but am using Mac OS X for 90% of my work.

If you can get the Student discount it's a great deal.

Cheers

I know I can get the taxes off, but I wonder which one would be worth more, the $100 student discount or the taxes off. I'll have to see.

Pretty much how it seems everyone feels and it's what I want to feel, it seems like it's just so much more productive, with Windows I just spend my time looking for a decent app to do things or end up taking twice the time to do something just cause I have to open tons of things and move everything around to do 1 thing, when I see in videos of Mac OS X things are more intuitive. I guess I'm not going wrong with that! I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

Have you not used Windows 7? Having a lot of things open at once isn't an issue on the latest version of windows with Aero Peek. You honestly sound like you just want a MAC because I have no issues with Windows being productive.

I know many people would strongly disagree with me, but personally I wouldn't buy a MBP even if I had $1,000,000 to burn. I was assigned a 17" MBP at work to create an iPhone app, and I tried for 3 weeks to like it enough to make it my primary notebook, but in the end I went back to my HP. Mac OS X looks pretty, but really ended up being annoying to me (lacking in window management, UI inconsistencies, stability issues - yes, I've had more trouble with my MBP with Snow Leopard than my HP with Windows 7). The hardware is also lacking for the amount of money you pay, with no docking-port option, no HDMI out, no memory card readers, forced to buy adapters to hook up monitors, uncomfortably sharp edges, etc. As far as the good points, it does have very good battery life, nice track-pad, and quick resume from sleep.

IMO, if you buy a good HP notebook (not their cheapest, the Envy is nice) running Windows 7 you'll be much happier in the long run...

I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

I agree, it is strange that Macs have the reputation of being "better at graphics," when they are in actuality significantly slower at both gaming graphics, and graphic design work (the Adobe suite in particular runs significantly slower on Mac OSX than on Windows 7 on the same hardware).

when i joined animation school, many people suggested me to buy an mac, but whenever i ask what so special in mac for designing and animation, they have no answer, so i built an i7 system, installed win7, ubuntu and OSX 10.6.4 ( Hackint0sh ).....and i only use OSX for final cut pro.....it was much cheaper than an apple system, i also got OSX and i didnt found any difference in graphics work......photoshop performs same on windows and OSX, so you can get a good notebook with better specs and much cheaper.....and you can install OSX on it too if you want to do experiment...

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

$1799 is quite a lot for the 15" model , but if you are to spend most of your time coding or reading , you really need something bigger then 13" .

Maybe you ca find some student discount (last time i checked it was just 5%) . Or hook the 13" to an external display . Or you could buy a used one / previous gen . It's that good . Only for the screen and it's a sell .

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

I guess you did not read the article I linked.

There is not much difference nowadays, it comes down to personal preference.

In past most of the Graphics Editing software was written for Macs, which is not the case anymore.

Some graphic designers are saying that the MacBook Pro screens are reproducing the colors more accurately and that is the reason they tend to go with Macs.

Mac Pros seem to offer upgrades up to 12 cores for some heavy duty decoding/encoding and other media editing, but they come at a very high price.

The reasone I picked up the MacBook Pro 13' is because it gave me a better battery life and stronger and lighter casing than HP or DEll had at that time, and I paid about the same as I would have for the Envy 13'

P.S. Make sure you do some research on the Envy, some of their models had problems with batteries and overheating.....

On the side of productivity, Windows 7 is indeed very productive in comparison to previous instalments, but you cannot compare to the flow of a Mac Book.

With the likes of Spaces and Expose, combined with the shortcuts and figure gestures of the touchpad, I find productivity much better on my Mac Book than on my Windows 7 laptop. Even installing OSX down the homebrew route will limit yourself because of the lack of the multi-touch trackpad (besides the fact you'll inevitably be missing at least one driver).

Think carefully about the balance of money and productivity, but if I had to choose between my Windows 7 Laptop and MBP, I'd take the MBP everytime.

http://www.newegg.co...0-717-_-Product

I think that just about suits your needs. Nvidia optimus for integrated and discrete graphics, 2.26 intel core i3 processor, 13" and Aluminum case. It even has 2 finger scrolling if you like the OS X's scrolling method.

Yeah, the Asus laptop doesnt look bad for the price. It does not have an Aluminum casing though....

I originally switched to OSX when I bought my 24" iMac in 2008 to replace a 2005 HP tower. After that, I replaced my Dell Inspiron for a 13" Macbook in 2009. I couldn't be happier with my choices. I work in graphic design, and I've found the Adobe Suites (2 through 4) to run smoother on my Macs than it ever did on any PC (mine, and those in a few of my classes). I did spend a semester working in After Effects, as well as Maya and both graphic intensive programs ran smoother on my Macs than any PC I had access to at the time--which, in all fairness, may have been a bit outdated.

I do some work in HTML, and I've found myself enjoying BBEdit far more than I ever did Notepad++, but that's just personal preference.

If you've tried out OSX and you find yourself enjoying it more over Windows, then I'd definitely say go for the MBP. If you've tried it, and it rubs you the wrong way, or you can't see yourself becoming comfortable with the OS or the machine, then you're probably better off with a PC. You're always going to come across people telling you to stay away from Apple for this or that reason--and it often has more to do with that persons personal distaste for Apple, and their loyalty with Windows--but what matters is how you feel working on your own machine.

Hope that helps, and good luck. :)

-Emily

I guess you did not read the article I linked.

There is not much difference nowadays, it comes down to personal preference.

In past most of the Graphics Editing software was written for Macs, which is not the case anymore.

Some graphic designers are saying that the MacBook Pro screens are reproducing the colors more accurately and that is the reason they tend to go with Macs.

Mac Pros seem to offer upgrades up to 12 cores for some heavy duty decoding/encoding and other media editing, but they come at a very high price.

The reasone I picked up the MacBook Pro 13' is because it gave me a better battery life and stronger and lighter casing than HP or DEll had at that time, and I paid about the same as I would have for the Envy 13'

P.S. Make sure you do some research on the Envy, some of their models had problems with batteries and overheating.....

actually i read the article and didnt found any point saying whats the difference.....but i have to say there is difference in colors when i use illustrator on mac and windows.....but it doesn't mean that which one is better.....and yes in last its your personal preference.....if you feel comfortable with OSX than go for it, if you feel comfortable with windows go for it......there is no difference in performance or hardware.....just your preference.... :)

I just recently ordered a 17" HP Pavilion dv7t Select Edition

It was $1250 customized.

A spec comparison between the HP laptop I ordered for $1250 and the 17" MBP that costs $2350 (upgraded the HDD to 7200rpm to match the HP):

HP: Intel Core i5 2.40GHz, with Turbo Boost up to 2.66 GHz

MBP: 2.53GHz Intel Core i5

HP: 6GB DDR3 System Memory

MBP: 4GB DDR3 System Memory

HP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

MBP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

HP: 1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 switchable graphics [HDMI, VGA]

MBP: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory and Intel HD Graphics with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory

HP: 17.3" diagonal HD+ High-Definition HP LED BrightView Infinity Widescreen Display (1600 x 900)

MBP: MacBook Pro 17-inch Hi-Resolution Glossy Widescreen Display

HP: Blu-Ray ROM with SuperMulti DVD+/-R/RW Double Layer

MBP: SuperDrive 8x (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

HP: One 6 Cell (standard) and One 9 Cell (over-sized) Lithium Ion Battery

MBP: Built-in 95-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery

To me, I just can't see spending the price difference there. I love OS X and my Macs but for the value they just aren't worth it anymore. The prices are dropping so much for other computer manufacturers, but Apple just doesn't seem to understand that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.10 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.10 changelog: New Features The bootstrapping algorithm has been completely redesigned. The software can now launch directly without requiring TS Preloader. As part of this change, the startup splash screen displayed during initialization has been removed. In addition, spikes in CPU usage have been eliminated, resulting in a more stable architecture with significantly lower memory consumption. The Microsoft Office detection infrastructure within the Operating System section has been enhanced. Additional detection support has been added for Office C2R (Click-to-Run) installations. Furthermore, the license status evaluation system has been improved, and the priority order has been revised as follows: Licensed > Grace Period > Other (NOTIFICATIONS, EVALUATION, etc.). Glow now includes preliminary support for Wi-Fi 8 technology, allowing more detailed information to be displayed for Wi-Fi 8-compatible network adapters. Glow now provides full support for Bluetooth 6.2. Adapters supporting Bluetooth 6.2 can be analyzed in greater detail and with improved accuracy. The disk distribution view in the Disk section has been modernized, replacing the traditional table layout with a new 2×2 card-based design. The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to v26.7. Thanks to the new custom controls, all Türkaysoft applications now offer a more modern and consistent user interface aligned with Windows 11 design standards. Bug Fixes Potential line-ending handling issues in the Office detection code within the Operating System section have been resolved. Additionally, the output format has been standardized to UTF-8 to prevent character encoding issues and ensure consistent data processing. Several stability and file management issues within the Debugging infrastructure have been addressed. Problems that prevented new log files from being created after Debugging was disabled, as well as issues causing debug records to be lost, have been fixed. File deletion and reaccess issues that occurred after file locks were released have also been resolved. In addition, a bug that caused newly recreated log files to remain locked after deletion has been eliminated. Unnecessary blank lines within debug logs and the extra empty line that could appear at the end of log files have also been corrected. A shortcut key conflict caused by assigning identical hotkeys to both the DNS Test Tool and the Donation page has been fixed. The DNS Test Tool can now be accessed using CTRL + Shift + D, while the Donation page is available via CTRL + Alt + D. Changes The service responsible for providing the Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider information in the Network section has been updated to use the ipinfo.io infrastructure. This change improves the accuracy and consistency of the displayed data. (No external requests are made while Hiding Mode is enabled.) Some terms in the Dutch and Korean language files have been updated to make them clearer and more user-friendly. [TS Updater] Before the update process begins, users are now prompted to choose whether they would like to view the release notes. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.10 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!