Recommended Posts

I just recently ordered a 17" HP Pavilion dv7t Select Edition

It was $1250 customized.

A spec comparison between the HP laptop I ordered for $1250 and the 17" MBP that costs $2350 (upgraded the HDD to 7200rpm to match the HP):

HP: Intel Core i5 2.40GHz, with Turbo Boost up to 2.66 GHz

MBP: 2.53GHz Intel Core i5

HP: 6GB DDR3 System Memory

MBP: 4GB DDR3 System Memory

HP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

MBP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

HP: 1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 switchable graphics [HDMI, VGA]

MBP: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory and Intel HD Graphics with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory

HP: 17.3" diagonal HD+ High-Definition HP LED BrightView Infinity Widescreen Display (1600 x 900)

MBP: MacBook Pro 17-inch Hi-Resolution Glossy Widescreen Display

HP: Blu-Ray ROM with SuperMulti DVD+/-R/RW Double Layer

MBP: SuperDrive 8x (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

HP: One 6 Cell (standard) and One 9 Cell (over-sized) Lithium Ion Battery

MBP: Built-in 95-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery

To me, I just can't see spending the price difference there. I love OS X and my Macs but for the value they just aren't worth it anymore. The prices are dropping so much for other computer manufacturers, but Apple just doesn't seem to understand that.

you sholud have gotten the Envy 17

Thanks for the comments, I've decided to go for the MBP anyways. As for the screensize at home, I have my desktop PC with Windows 7, and I could always connect my MBP to a monithor, either 21 or 25.5. :p

I just bought a 27" to hook my Macbook up to a few months ago, and it works beautifully. You generally need an adapter, but those aren't hard to come by. And don't forget that Boot Camp will come with your Mac, so you can always throw a copy of Windows on there should you need it.

I hope you enjoy your MBP. :)

-Emily

I just bought a 27" to hook my Macbook up to a few months ago, and it works beautifully. You generally need an adapter, but those aren't hard to come by. And don't forget that Boot Camp will come with your Mac, so you can always throw a copy of Windows on there should you need it.

I hope you enjoy your MBP. :)

-Emily

Sounds like I won't miss a thing! :)

I assume since you're taking computer science I assume part of programming beyond the first year will involve using Visual Studio; as desirable as Mac OS X is, it just isn't worth being out of step when it comes to doing computer science and having to always be the odd man out when it comes to programming. At the end of the day it is about having the right tool for the job - with that being said I guess it depends on what your programming course entails.

What ever choice you do make, research heavily into what your degree requirements are - the last thing you want to go is go off to purchase a sexy machine only to find yourself incompatible with what is required.

Side note, I'm studying a liberal arts degree majoring in religious studies and philosophy so having a Mac is more than sufficient.

I assume since you're taking computer science I assume part of programming beyond the first year will involve using Visual Studio; as desirable as Mac OS X is, it just isn't worth being out of step when it comes to doing computer science and having to always be the odd man out when it comes to programming. At the end of the day it is about having the right tool for the job - with that being said I guess it depends on what your programming course entails.

What ever choice you do make, research heavily into what your degree requirements are - the last thing you want to go is go off to purchase a sexy machine only to find yourself incompatible with what is required.

Side note, I'm studying a liberal arts degree majoring in religious studies and philosophy so having a Mac is more than sufficient.

With Boot Camp allowing him to dual boot into Windows, that shouldn't be an issue at all. Admittedly, I don't know too much about Computer Science and programming, but in my experience--as a graphic designer with a programmer boyfriend--any Microsoft-based tools you require on a Mac can generally be used--whether through dual booting, or not--or a decent Mac-specific replacement can be found.

With Boot Camp allowing him to dual boot into Windows, that shouldn't be an issue at all. Admittedly, I don't know too much about Computer Science and programming, but in my experience--as a graphic designer with a programmer boyfriend--any Microsoft-based tools you require on a Mac can generally be used--whether through dual booting, or not--or a decent Mac-specific replacement can be found.

If you're going to spend 90% of your time using Windows then you might as well get a computer preloaded with Windows - Windows running on Mac is just plain horrible, the drivers are poorly optimised, chew through battery power etc.

I've used a Mac for my first 2 years at University and its been awesome. I recently sold it because I got good money considering it was aging and bought a pretty good PC laptop. Ugh, what a mistake...computing just isn't the same.

I'll be picking up a MBP in the next week or two. :)

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

When I ask designers that question, it usually boils down to the fact that OS X is more elegant than Windows. If your profession is design, you tend to be very sensitive to these things. Very subjective, I know, but this is the feedback that I get.

When I ask designers that question, it usually boils down to the fact that OS X is more elegant than Windows. If your profession is design, you tend to be very sensitive to these things. Very subjective, I know, but this is the feedback that I get.

For me, I am not a designer but I do think that the ascetics of the user interface are important - if I don't feel comfortable using something I'm going to be less productive. If you use something for a long period of time each day then you'll want it to be as comfortable as possible - just as a trucker will want a seat that is comfortable for long driving or someone who enjoys driving having his/her car outfitted with the things he/she likes.

I've never felt comfortable running Windows so I own a Mac - nothing to do with some sort of 'objective superiority', but rather for me I find it superior (subjective/situational).

When I ask designers that question, it usually boils down to the fact that OS X is more elegant than Windows. If your profession is design, you tend to be very sensitive to these things. Very subjective, I know, but this is the feedback that I get.

This has being done to death. But its nothing of the sort. Its down to decades ago the Mac platform was the only viable option to have if you was in desktop publishing. They was way ahead of Windows in that area at the time and had developments not available on windows, postscript, laserprinters, quark, freehand, photoshop, etc.

Now its more down to tradition and what you know, brought up through design college using Macs then their way tends to feel more natural then windows, I assume its the otherway round with someone brought up on Windows.

This has being done to death. But its nothing of the sort. Its down to decades ago the Mac platform was the only viable option to have if you was in desktop publishing. They was way ahead of Windows in that area at the time and had developments not available on windows, postscript, laserprinters, quark, freehand, photoshop, etc.

Now its more down to tradition and what you know, brought up through design college using Macs then their way tends to feel more natural then windows, I assume its the otherway round with someone brought up on Windows.

I have at least three designer friends who were "brought up" on Windows, and who have switched to Macs. All of them owned PCs in uni, and switched to Macs a year of two after they started working. I'm merely repeating the feedback I got from them.

Having said that, I have experienced first hand how schools can be biased towards a platform. I studied multimedia and computer science in uni. The school of design was extremely pro-Mac and anti-PC. The school of CS was the opposite. Very pro-PC and anti-Mac. I didn't own a Mac in uni. I actually hated them. Ironically, I am now a developer, but prefer Macs.

Ditto, I had to endure some ridicule during college regarding my Mac choice when I was doing CS. In the end, the muttering stopped because more and more of my school mates started being seen with Macs and soon enough the school introduced an Apple development course and outfitted the school with 200+ Mac Pros.

Times are a-changing.

I assume since you're taking computer science I assume part of programming beyond the first year will involve using Visual Studio; as desirable as Mac OS X is, it just isn't worth being out of step when it comes to doing computer science and having to always be the odd man out when it comes to programming. At the end of the day it is about having the right tool for the job - with that being said I guess it depends on what your programming course entails.

Funny thing is when I did my Computer Science degree (2002-2007) my school was all WinXP EXCEPT for the computer science dept which was all UNIX and Linux. Having a MBP was AWESOME as it's way easier to make sure my assignments etc were going to run on the school's computer (we used make, gcc etc etc, they can run on Windows but I found it was better on OSX).

Also I could ssh into school from home and run GUI apps through X11, that saved me quite a few trips back to school :)

I got my MBP yesterday and I absolutely love it so far. I'm simply addicted to it. Way better than my dv6 which is a mid-range alternative to the high-end Envy series (GXXt being the low-end). I love everything about it, especially the high resolution. Battery life's ok. Not as great as Apple declares. 4-6 hours depending on what I do.

I also got Windows 7 running thanks to Bootcamp. Run's like a charm.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'd say the first one failed to be as popular as Apple anticipated, but the easy adjustment here is to make fewer of them next time around. It would only be a "flop" if it isn't possible for Apple to recover the design and factory tooling costs given the number of units sold, which I doubt would be the case. It isn't like no one bought them; it just failed to become the new hot phone of the year.
    • You're right that it does not follow the plain meaning of the word, but in this context, it is a legal term defined in 49 U.S.C. Kind of how "wire fraud" laws apply even if a physical wire was not used. Given that it is codified in law, and it isn't just automotive journalists that don't understand evolving technology, I highly doubt congress would change a well understood term just because technology makes the term slightly less actuate.
    • This is exactly why I keep saying we are not ready for human free self-driving. These little "bugs" are may seem like random one-offs. There was also the Waymo that drove between police with drawn weapons and the suspect they were pointing them at. From a software perspective it is easy to understand how those extremely rare situations may not have been programed for, but that is the point. If AI needs to be told to watch out for every possible contingency, then it can never be successful. There will always be the possibility of a first encounter that the AI needs to understand to avoid.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Final by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 | 14.6MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      586
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      187
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      74
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!