Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Recently I've been kind of pushed into the idea of buying an MBP for the first time in my life. I'm currently studying Computer Science and therefore doing lots of programming/designining work and every time I've had the chance to play a little bit with Mac OS X I've personally loved it. More than anything this MBP would be used to take it to College, work on programming/designing and maybe a game here and there every once in a while, at most World of Warcraft. I'd be buying the 13' C2D model, can't really afford the 15' ones and higher models, but the normal MacBook doesn't convince me either.

So, I know I kinda made my own research, but, in general, how pleased are you from moving from PC/Win7 Laptop to a MBP or Mac OS X in general?

Also, since I currently live in Costa Rica and I'm going to Texas to visit some friends and do some shopping, I could order from Apple and have it sent to my friends house, but, I was thinking on buying it from BestBuy hoping I could get the taxes off, since I'm leaving after a week and also try and get a student discount. Would this be possible or am I asking too much?

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/927418-should-i-buy-an-mbp/
Share on other sites

I agree with Killa. Plus, if you're programming and you're worrying about money, you should know how to get a PC and make it a hackingtosh you'll save tons. Also, if you don't live in California,Tenesee Or New Jersey you can order your laptop from newegg.com and you won't be charged any sales tax (plus some offer free shipping!). On a last note, nothing says that you're a programmer / computer whiz more than having OSX on a PC.

I would personally go for a PC it's just better performance for the buck, this includes the drivers for your video card that will run your games a lot better than on a MAC.

I agree with Killa. Plus, if you're programming and you're worrying about money, you should know how to get a PC and make it a hackingtosh you'll save tons. Also, if you don't live in California,Tenesee Or New Jersey you can order your laptop from newegg.com and you won't be charged any sales tax (plus some offer free shipping!). On a last note, nothing says that you're a programmer / computer whiz more than having OSX on a PC.

I would personally go for a PC it's just better performance for the buck, this includes the drivers for your video card that will run your games a lot better than on a MAC.

true, plus the 17'' starts at $1399 and has a ATI Radeon 5850 http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/computer_can_series.do?storeName=computer_store&category=notebooks&a1=Category&v1=ENVY&a2=Screen+size&v2=Over+16.9&series_name=ENVY17_series&a1=Category&v1=ENVY&a2=Screen+size&v2=Over+16.9

I was also in university for computer science and I was given the choice to buy a laptop for school. I went with the Macbook Pro. I just graduated a month or two ago, so back then, it was not the unibody Macbook Pro's. Nowadays, the unibody Macbook Pro is a great choice. I got my old one replaced with the unibody for free on AppleCare because they broke my old one in a third repair (the old MBP was the one riddled with known problems).

In terms of usage, I would not trade in Mac OS X for anything else. It increased my productivity two-fold and I have since grown to love Mac OS X. I still use Windows when necessary and Linux for servers, but they cannot hold a candle to Mac OS for customization of one's own workflow in day-to-day use. I would say the transition to Mac OS was fairly easy and everything just seemed to make more sense than in Windows; just have to keep an open mind about trying new things. I am quite content with keeping my Mac completely Windows-free. Typically, Mac OS has more polished applications, consistent UI's with excellent integration with features of the OS and Finder which is something I find impossible to find in Windows. The Pro line has the power necessary to keep up with my uses and I have had no need to upgrade to a higher model.

Build quality on the new Macbook Pro's are great.

Hope that helps!

Student discount and taxes off at Best buy? Not happening. I know Apple has student discounts but ONLINE. The Macbook Pro is great but I like the bigger LCD sizes. I am a Windows fanboy so I would prefer Windows 7 over OS X.

I know I can get the taxes off, but I wonder which one would be worth more, the $100 student discount or the taxes off. I'll have to see.

I was also in university for computer science and I was given the choice to buy a laptop for school. I went with the Macbook Pro. I just graduated a month or two ago, so back then, it was not the unibody Macbook Pro's. Nowadays, the unibody Macbook Pro is a great choice. I got my old one replaced with the unibody for free on AppleCare because they broke my old one in a third repair (the old MBP was the one riddled with known problems).

In terms of usage, I would not trade in Mac OS X for anything else. It increased my productivity two-fold and I have since grown to love Mac OS X. I still use Windows when necessary and Linux for servers, but they cannot hold a candle to Mac OS for customization of one's own workflow in day-to-day use. I would say the transition to Mac OS was fairly easy and everything just seemed to make more sense than in Windows; just have to keep an open mind about trying new things. I am quite content with keeping my Mac completely Windows-free. Typically, Mac OS has more polished applications, consistent UI's with excellent integration with features of the OS and Finder which is something I find impossible to find in Windows. The Pro line has the power necessary to keep up with my uses and I have had no need to upgrade to a higher model.

Build quality on the new Macbook Pro's are great.

Hope that helps!

Pretty much how it seems everyone feels and it's what I want to feel, it seems like it's just so much more productive, with Windows I just spend my time looking for a decent app to do things or end up taking twice the time to do something just cause I have to open tons of things and move everything around to do 1 thing, when I see in videos of Mac OS X things are more intuitive. I guess I'm not going wrong with that! I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

So, I know I kinda made my own research, but, in general, how pleased are you from moving from PC/Win7 Laptop to a MBP or Mac OS X in general?

I got the same 13' MBP last summer and I love it. It's a great piece of hardware. I am running Mac OS X and have Win 7 installed on Virtual Box due to couple of apps that I ran at work, but am using Mac OS X for 90% of my work.

If you can get the Student discount it's a great deal.

Cheers

I know I can get the taxes off, but I wonder which one would be worth more, the $100 student discount or the taxes off. I'll have to see.

Pretty much how it seems everyone feels and it's what I want to feel, it seems like it's just so much more productive, with Windows I just spend my time looking for a decent app to do things or end up taking twice the time to do something just cause I have to open tons of things and move everything around to do 1 thing, when I see in videos of Mac OS X things are more intuitive. I guess I'm not going wrong with that! I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

Have you not used Windows 7? Having a lot of things open at once isn't an issue on the latest version of windows with Aero Peek. You honestly sound like you just want a MAC because I have no issues with Windows being productive.

I know many people would strongly disagree with me, but personally I wouldn't buy a MBP even if I had $1,000,000 to burn. I was assigned a 17" MBP at work to create an iPhone app, and I tried for 3 weeks to like it enough to make it my primary notebook, but in the end I went back to my HP. Mac OS X looks pretty, but really ended up being annoying to me (lacking in window management, UI inconsistencies, stability issues - yes, I've had more trouble with my MBP with Snow Leopard than my HP with Windows 7). The hardware is also lacking for the amount of money you pay, with no docking-port option, no HDMI out, no memory card readers, forced to buy adapters to hook up monitors, uncomfortably sharp edges, etc. As far as the good points, it does have very good battery life, nice track-pad, and quick resume from sleep.

IMO, if you buy a good HP notebook (not their cheapest, the Envy is nice) running Windows 7 you'll be much happier in the long run...

I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

I agree, it is strange that Macs have the reputation of being "better at graphics," when they are in actuality significantly slower at both gaming graphics, and graphic design work (the Adobe suite in particular runs significantly slower on Mac OSX than on Windows 7 on the same hardware).

when i joined animation school, many people suggested me to buy an mac, but whenever i ask what so special in mac for designing and animation, they have no answer, so i built an i7 system, installed win7, ubuntu and OSX 10.6.4 ( Hackint0sh ).....and i only use OSX for final cut pro.....it was much cheaper than an apple system, i also got OSX and i didnt found any difference in graphics work......photoshop performs same on windows and OSX, so you can get a good notebook with better specs and much cheaper.....and you can install OSX on it too if you want to do experiment...

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

$1799 is quite a lot for the 15" model , but if you are to spend most of your time coding or reading , you really need something bigger then 13" .

Maybe you ca find some student discount (last time i checked it was just 5%) . Or hook the 13" to an external display . Or you could buy a used one / previous gen . It's that good . Only for the screen and it's a sell .

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

I guess you did not read the article I linked.

There is not much difference nowadays, it comes down to personal preference.

In past most of the Graphics Editing software was written for Macs, which is not the case anymore.

Some graphic designers are saying that the MacBook Pro screens are reproducing the colors more accurately and that is the reason they tend to go with Macs.

Mac Pros seem to offer upgrades up to 12 cores for some heavy duty decoding/encoding and other media editing, but they come at a very high price.

The reasone I picked up the MacBook Pro 13' is because it gave me a better battery life and stronger and lighter casing than HP or DEll had at that time, and I paid about the same as I would have for the Envy 13'

P.S. Make sure you do some research on the Envy, some of their models had problems with batteries and overheating.....

On the side of productivity, Windows 7 is indeed very productive in comparison to previous instalments, but you cannot compare to the flow of a Mac Book.

With the likes of Spaces and Expose, combined with the shortcuts and figure gestures of the touchpad, I find productivity much better on my Mac Book than on my Windows 7 laptop. Even installing OSX down the homebrew route will limit yourself because of the lack of the multi-touch trackpad (besides the fact you'll inevitably be missing at least one driver).

Think carefully about the balance of money and productivity, but if I had to choose between my Windows 7 Laptop and MBP, I'd take the MBP everytime.

http://www.newegg.co...0-717-_-Product

I think that just about suits your needs. Nvidia optimus for integrated and discrete graphics, 2.26 intel core i3 processor, 13" and Aluminum case. It even has 2 finger scrolling if you like the OS X's scrolling method.

Yeah, the Asus laptop doesnt look bad for the price. It does not have an Aluminum casing though....

I originally switched to OSX when I bought my 24" iMac in 2008 to replace a 2005 HP tower. After that, I replaced my Dell Inspiron for a 13" Macbook in 2009. I couldn't be happier with my choices. I work in graphic design, and I've found the Adobe Suites (2 through 4) to run smoother on my Macs than it ever did on any PC (mine, and those in a few of my classes). I did spend a semester working in After Effects, as well as Maya and both graphic intensive programs ran smoother on my Macs than any PC I had access to at the time--which, in all fairness, may have been a bit outdated.

I do some work in HTML, and I've found myself enjoying BBEdit far more than I ever did Notepad++, but that's just personal preference.

If you've tried out OSX and you find yourself enjoying it more over Windows, then I'd definitely say go for the MBP. If you've tried it, and it rubs you the wrong way, or you can't see yourself becoming comfortable with the OS or the machine, then you're probably better off with a PC. You're always going to come across people telling you to stay away from Apple for this or that reason--and it often has more to do with that persons personal distaste for Apple, and their loyalty with Windows--but what matters is how you feel working on your own machine.

Hope that helps, and good luck. :)

-Emily

I guess you did not read the article I linked.

There is not much difference nowadays, it comes down to personal preference.

In past most of the Graphics Editing software was written for Macs, which is not the case anymore.

Some graphic designers are saying that the MacBook Pro screens are reproducing the colors more accurately and that is the reason they tend to go with Macs.

Mac Pros seem to offer upgrades up to 12 cores for some heavy duty decoding/encoding and other media editing, but they come at a very high price.

The reasone I picked up the MacBook Pro 13' is because it gave me a better battery life and stronger and lighter casing than HP or DEll had at that time, and I paid about the same as I would have for the Envy 13'

P.S. Make sure you do some research on the Envy, some of their models had problems with batteries and overheating.....

actually i read the article and didnt found any point saying whats the difference.....but i have to say there is difference in colors when i use illustrator on mac and windows.....but it doesn't mean that which one is better.....and yes in last its your personal preference.....if you feel comfortable with OSX than go for it, if you feel comfortable with windows go for it......there is no difference in performance or hardware.....just your preference.... :)

I just recently ordered a 17" HP Pavilion dv7t Select Edition

It was $1250 customized.

A spec comparison between the HP laptop I ordered for $1250 and the 17" MBP that costs $2350 (upgraded the HDD to 7200rpm to match the HP):

HP: Intel Core i5 2.40GHz, with Turbo Boost up to 2.66 GHz

MBP: 2.53GHz Intel Core i5

HP: 6GB DDR3 System Memory

MBP: 4GB DDR3 System Memory

HP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

MBP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

HP: 1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 switchable graphics [HDMI, VGA]

MBP: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory and Intel HD Graphics with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory

HP: 17.3" diagonal HD+ High-Definition HP LED BrightView Infinity Widescreen Display (1600 x 900)

MBP: MacBook Pro 17-inch Hi-Resolution Glossy Widescreen Display

HP: Blu-Ray ROM with SuperMulti DVD+/-R/RW Double Layer

MBP: SuperDrive 8x (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

HP: One 6 Cell (standard) and One 9 Cell (over-sized) Lithium Ion Battery

MBP: Built-in 95-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery

To me, I just can't see spending the price difference there. I love OS X and my Macs but for the value they just aren't worth it anymore. The prices are dropping so much for other computer manufacturers, but Apple just doesn't seem to understand that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!