Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

Recently I've been kind of pushed into the idea of buying an MBP for the first time in my life. I'm currently studying Computer Science and therefore doing lots of programming/designining work and every time I've had the chance to play a little bit with Mac OS X I've personally loved it. More than anything this MBP would be used to take it to College, work on programming/designing and maybe a game here and there every once in a while, at most World of Warcraft. I'd be buying the 13' C2D model, can't really afford the 15' ones and higher models, but the normal MacBook doesn't convince me either.

So, I know I kinda made my own research, but, in general, how pleased are you from moving from PC/Win7 Laptop to a MBP or Mac OS X in general?

Also, since I currently live in Costa Rica and I'm going to Texas to visit some friends and do some shopping, I could order from Apple and have it sent to my friends house, but, I was thinking on buying it from BestBuy hoping I could get the taxes off, since I'm leaving after a week and also try and get a student discount. Would this be possible or am I asking too much?

Thanks!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/927418-should-i-buy-an-mbp/
Share on other sites

I agree with Killa. Plus, if you're programming and you're worrying about money, you should know how to get a PC and make it a hackingtosh you'll save tons. Also, if you don't live in California,Tenesee Or New Jersey you can order your laptop from newegg.com and you won't be charged any sales tax (plus some offer free shipping!). On a last note, nothing says that you're a programmer / computer whiz more than having OSX on a PC.

I would personally go for a PC it's just better performance for the buck, this includes the drivers for your video card that will run your games a lot better than on a MAC.

I agree with Killa. Plus, if you're programming and you're worrying about money, you should know how to get a PC and make it a hackingtosh you'll save tons. Also, if you don't live in California,Tenesee Or New Jersey you can order your laptop from newegg.com and you won't be charged any sales tax (plus some offer free shipping!). On a last note, nothing says that you're a programmer / computer whiz more than having OSX on a PC.

I would personally go for a PC it's just better performance for the buck, this includes the drivers for your video card that will run your games a lot better than on a MAC.

true, plus the 17'' starts at $1399 and has a ATI Radeon 5850 http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopping/computer_can_series.do?storeName=computer_store&category=notebooks&a1=Category&v1=ENVY&a2=Screen+size&v2=Over+16.9&series_name=ENVY17_series&a1=Category&v1=ENVY&a2=Screen+size&v2=Over+16.9

I was also in university for computer science and I was given the choice to buy a laptop for school. I went with the Macbook Pro. I just graduated a month or two ago, so back then, it was not the unibody Macbook Pro's. Nowadays, the unibody Macbook Pro is a great choice. I got my old one replaced with the unibody for free on AppleCare because they broke my old one in a third repair (the old MBP was the one riddled with known problems).

In terms of usage, I would not trade in Mac OS X for anything else. It increased my productivity two-fold and I have since grown to love Mac OS X. I still use Windows when necessary and Linux for servers, but they cannot hold a candle to Mac OS for customization of one's own workflow in day-to-day use. I would say the transition to Mac OS was fairly easy and everything just seemed to make more sense than in Windows; just have to keep an open mind about trying new things. I am quite content with keeping my Mac completely Windows-free. Typically, Mac OS has more polished applications, consistent UI's with excellent integration with features of the OS and Finder which is something I find impossible to find in Windows. The Pro line has the power necessary to keep up with my uses and I have had no need to upgrade to a higher model.

Build quality on the new Macbook Pro's are great.

Hope that helps!

Student discount and taxes off at Best buy? Not happening. I know Apple has student discounts but ONLINE. The Macbook Pro is great but I like the bigger LCD sizes. I am a Windows fanboy so I would prefer Windows 7 over OS X.

I know I can get the taxes off, but I wonder which one would be worth more, the $100 student discount or the taxes off. I'll have to see.

I was also in university for computer science and I was given the choice to buy a laptop for school. I went with the Macbook Pro. I just graduated a month or two ago, so back then, it was not the unibody Macbook Pro's. Nowadays, the unibody Macbook Pro is a great choice. I got my old one replaced with the unibody for free on AppleCare because they broke my old one in a third repair (the old MBP was the one riddled with known problems).

In terms of usage, I would not trade in Mac OS X for anything else. It increased my productivity two-fold and I have since grown to love Mac OS X. I still use Windows when necessary and Linux for servers, but they cannot hold a candle to Mac OS for customization of one's own workflow in day-to-day use. I would say the transition to Mac OS was fairly easy and everything just seemed to make more sense than in Windows; just have to keep an open mind about trying new things. I am quite content with keeping my Mac completely Windows-free. Typically, Mac OS has more polished applications, consistent UI's with excellent integration with features of the OS and Finder which is something I find impossible to find in Windows. The Pro line has the power necessary to keep up with my uses and I have had no need to upgrade to a higher model.

Build quality on the new Macbook Pro's are great.

Hope that helps!

Pretty much how it seems everyone feels and it's what I want to feel, it seems like it's just so much more productive, with Windows I just spend my time looking for a decent app to do things or end up taking twice the time to do something just cause I have to open tons of things and move everything around to do 1 thing, when I see in videos of Mac OS X things are more intuitive. I guess I'm not going wrong with that! I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

So, I know I kinda made my own research, but, in general, how pleased are you from moving from PC/Win7 Laptop to a MBP or Mac OS X in general?

I got the same 13' MBP last summer and I love it. It's a great piece of hardware. I am running Mac OS X and have Win 7 installed on Virtual Box due to couple of apps that I ran at work, but am using Mac OS X for 90% of my work.

If you can get the Student discount it's a great deal.

Cheers

I know I can get the taxes off, but I wonder which one would be worth more, the $100 student discount or the taxes off. I'll have to see.

Pretty much how it seems everyone feels and it's what I want to feel, it seems like it's just so much more productive, with Windows I just spend my time looking for a decent app to do things or end up taking twice the time to do something just cause I have to open tons of things and move everything around to do 1 thing, when I see in videos of Mac OS X things are more intuitive. I guess I'm not going wrong with that! I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

Have you not used Windows 7? Having a lot of things open at once isn't an issue on the latest version of windows with Aero Peek. You honestly sound like you just want a MAC because I have no issues with Windows being productive.

I know many people would strongly disagree with me, but personally I wouldn't buy a MBP even if I had $1,000,000 to burn. I was assigned a 17" MBP at work to create an iPhone app, and I tried for 3 weeks to like it enough to make it my primary notebook, but in the end I went back to my HP. Mac OS X looks pretty, but really ended up being annoying to me (lacking in window management, UI inconsistencies, stability issues - yes, I've had more trouble with my MBP with Snow Leopard than my HP with Windows 7). The hardware is also lacking for the amount of money you pay, with no docking-port option, no HDMI out, no memory card readers, forced to buy adapters to hook up monitors, uncomfortably sharp edges, etc. As far as the good points, it does have very good battery life, nice track-pad, and quick resume from sleep.

IMO, if you buy a good HP notebook (not their cheapest, the Envy is nice) running Windows 7 you'll be much happier in the long run...

I've been hearing though that the graphics drivers are not as decent as Windows graphic drivers. Which I find strange, since people use macs for video processing and what not.

I agree, it is strange that Macs have the reputation of being "better at graphics," when they are in actuality significantly slower at both gaming graphics, and graphic design work (the Adobe suite in particular runs significantly slower on Mac OSX than on Windows 7 on the same hardware).

when i joined animation school, many people suggested me to buy an mac, but whenever i ask what so special in mac for designing and animation, they have no answer, so i built an i7 system, installed win7, ubuntu and OSX 10.6.4 ( Hackint0sh ).....and i only use OSX for final cut pro.....it was much cheaper than an apple system, i also got OSX and i didnt found any difference in graphics work......photoshop performs same on windows and OSX, so you can get a good notebook with better specs and much cheaper.....and you can install OSX on it too if you want to do experiment...

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

$1799 is quite a lot for the 15" model , but if you are to spend most of your time coding or reading , you really need something bigger then 13" .

Maybe you ca find some student discount (last time i checked it was just 5%) . Or hook the 13" to an external display . Or you could buy a used one / previous gen . It's that good . Only for the screen and it's a sell .

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

I guess you did not read the article I linked.

There is not much difference nowadays, it comes down to personal preference.

In past most of the Graphics Editing software was written for Macs, which is not the case anymore.

Some graphic designers are saying that the MacBook Pro screens are reproducing the colors more accurately and that is the reason they tend to go with Macs.

Mac Pros seem to offer upgrades up to 12 cores for some heavy duty decoding/encoding and other media editing, but they come at a very high price.

The reasone I picked up the MacBook Pro 13' is because it gave me a better battery life and stronger and lighter casing than HP or DEll had at that time, and I paid about the same as I would have for the Envy 13'

P.S. Make sure you do some research on the Envy, some of their models had problems with batteries and overheating.....

On the side of productivity, Windows 7 is indeed very productive in comparison to previous instalments, but you cannot compare to the flow of a Mac Book.

With the likes of Spaces and Expose, combined with the shortcuts and figure gestures of the touchpad, I find productivity much better on my Mac Book than on my Windows 7 laptop. Even installing OSX down the homebrew route will limit yourself because of the lack of the multi-touch trackpad (besides the fact you'll inevitably be missing at least one driver).

Think carefully about the balance of money and productivity, but if I had to choose between my Windows 7 Laptop and MBP, I'd take the MBP everytime.

http://www.newegg.co...0-717-_-Product

I think that just about suits your needs. Nvidia optimus for integrated and discrete graphics, 2.26 intel core i3 processor, 13" and Aluminum case. It even has 2 finger scrolling if you like the OS X's scrolling method.

Yeah, the Asus laptop doesnt look bad for the price. It does not have an Aluminum casing though....

I originally switched to OSX when I bought my 24" iMac in 2008 to replace a 2005 HP tower. After that, I replaced my Dell Inspiron for a 13" Macbook in 2009. I couldn't be happier with my choices. I work in graphic design, and I've found the Adobe Suites (2 through 4) to run smoother on my Macs than it ever did on any PC (mine, and those in a few of my classes). I did spend a semester working in After Effects, as well as Maya and both graphic intensive programs ran smoother on my Macs than any PC I had access to at the time--which, in all fairness, may have been a bit outdated.

I do some work in HTML, and I've found myself enjoying BBEdit far more than I ever did Notepad++, but that's just personal preference.

If you've tried out OSX and you find yourself enjoying it more over Windows, then I'd definitely say go for the MBP. If you've tried it, and it rubs you the wrong way, or you can't see yourself becoming comfortable with the OS or the machine, then you're probably better off with a PC. You're always going to come across people telling you to stay away from Apple for this or that reason--and it often has more to do with that persons personal distaste for Apple, and their loyalty with Windows--but what matters is how you feel working on your own machine.

Hope that helps, and good luck. :)

-Emily

I guess you did not read the article I linked.

There is not much difference nowadays, it comes down to personal preference.

In past most of the Graphics Editing software was written for Macs, which is not the case anymore.

Some graphic designers are saying that the MacBook Pro screens are reproducing the colors more accurately and that is the reason they tend to go with Macs.

Mac Pros seem to offer upgrades up to 12 cores for some heavy duty decoding/encoding and other media editing, but they come at a very high price.

The reasone I picked up the MacBook Pro 13' is because it gave me a better battery life and stronger and lighter casing than HP or DEll had at that time, and I paid about the same as I would have for the Envy 13'

P.S. Make sure you do some research on the Envy, some of their models had problems with batteries and overheating.....

actually i read the article and didnt found any point saying whats the difference.....but i have to say there is difference in colors when i use illustrator on mac and windows.....but it doesn't mean that which one is better.....and yes in last its your personal preference.....if you feel comfortable with OSX than go for it, if you feel comfortable with windows go for it......there is no difference in performance or hardware.....just your preference.... :)

I just recently ordered a 17" HP Pavilion dv7t Select Edition

It was $1250 customized.

A spec comparison between the HP laptop I ordered for $1250 and the 17" MBP that costs $2350 (upgraded the HDD to 7200rpm to match the HP):

HP: Intel Core i5 2.40GHz, with Turbo Boost up to 2.66 GHz

MBP: 2.53GHz Intel Core i5

HP: 6GB DDR3 System Memory

MBP: 4GB DDR3 System Memory

HP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

MBP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

HP: 1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 switchable graphics [HDMI, VGA]

MBP: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory and Intel HD Graphics with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory

HP: 17.3" diagonal HD+ High-Definition HP LED BrightView Infinity Widescreen Display (1600 x 900)

MBP: MacBook Pro 17-inch Hi-Resolution Glossy Widescreen Display

HP: Blu-Ray ROM with SuperMulti DVD+/-R/RW Double Layer

MBP: SuperDrive 8x (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

HP: One 6 Cell (standard) and One 9 Cell (over-sized) Lithium Ion Battery

MBP: Built-in 95-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery

To me, I just can't see spending the price difference there. I love OS X and my Macs but for the value they just aren't worth it anymore. The prices are dropping so much for other computer manufacturers, but Apple just doesn't seem to understand that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
    • I’m still using an Xbox One S, so time for an upgrade to play this but as much as I hate Sony, I think I’ll get the ps5 pro
    • I bought this game. Played it for an hour, and then got a refund from Steam. Not a fun game at all.
    • Nothing Ear buds with active noise cancellation are at their lowest price ever with 51% off by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the Nothing Ear wireless earbuds at their lowest price ever with 51% off limited prime deal. The earbuds feature an 11mm dynamic drivers with a ceramic diaphragm, and support high-resolution audio codecs including AAC, SBC, LDAC, and LHDC 5.0. They support active noise cancellation of up to 45dB across a frequency range of up to 5000Hz, and include a smart ANC algorithm, adaptive noise cancellation, and a transparency mode that allows surrounding sounds to be heard when needed. Connectivity is provided via Bluetooth 5.3, with support for multiple profiles including HFP, A2DP, AVRCP, and others. The earbuds also support dual connection, allowing them to be paired with two devices at the same time. Additional features include IP54 water and dust resistance for the earbuds and IP55 for the charging case, in-ear detection, pinch controls, low-latency mode, Google Fast Pair, Microsoft Swift Pair, and a three-microphone system per earbud for clearer voice calls. The Nothing X app, available on Android and iOS, provides access to custom EQ settings, bass enhancement, personal sound profiles, ear tip fit testing, firmware updates, customisable controls, dual-device management, and a find-my-earbuds feature. In terms of battery performance, each earbud has a 46mAh battery and the charging case has a 500mAh capacity. With active noise cancellation (ANC) turned off, the earbuds should offer up to 8.5 hours of playback on a single charge and up to 40.5 hours in total with the charging case. With ANC enabled, playback should last up to 5.2 hours on the earbuds and up to 24 hours with the case. For calls, talk time should reach up to 5 hours on the earbuds and 23 hours with the case when ANC is off, while ANC on should provide up to 4 hours on the earbuds and 18 hours with the case. Finally, fast charging should deliver up to 10 hours of playback from 10 minutes of charging when ANC is disabled. Nothing Ear Wireless Earbuds Bluetooth: $73.15 (Amazon US) - 51% off Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      572
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!