Recommended Posts

I just recently ordered a 17" HP Pavilion dv7t Select Edition

It was $1250 customized.

A spec comparison between the HP laptop I ordered for $1250 and the 17" MBP that costs $2350 (upgraded the HDD to 7200rpm to match the HP):

HP: Intel Core i5 2.40GHz, with Turbo Boost up to 2.66 GHz

MBP: 2.53GHz Intel Core i5

HP: 6GB DDR3 System Memory

MBP: 4GB DDR3 System Memory

HP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

MBP: 500GB 7200RPM SATA Hard Drive

HP: 1GB ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 switchable graphics [HDMI, VGA]

MBP: NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M graphics processor with 512MB of GDDR3 memory and Intel HD Graphics with 256MB of DDR3 SDRAM shared with main memory

HP: 17.3" diagonal HD+ High-Definition HP LED BrightView Infinity Widescreen Display (1600 x 900)

MBP: MacBook Pro 17-inch Hi-Resolution Glossy Widescreen Display

HP: Blu-Ray ROM with SuperMulti DVD+/-R/RW Double Layer

MBP: SuperDrive 8x (DVD?R DL/DVD?RW/CD-RW)

HP: One 6 Cell (standard) and One 9 Cell (over-sized) Lithium Ion Battery

MBP: Built-in 95-watt-hour lithium-polymer battery

To me, I just can't see spending the price difference there. I love OS X and my Macs but for the value they just aren't worth it anymore. The prices are dropping so much for other computer manufacturers, but Apple just doesn't seem to understand that.

you sholud have gotten the Envy 17

Thanks for the comments, I've decided to go for the MBP anyways. As for the screensize at home, I have my desktop PC with Windows 7, and I could always connect my MBP to a monithor, either 21 or 25.5. :p

I just bought a 27" to hook my Macbook up to a few months ago, and it works beautifully. You generally need an adapter, but those aren't hard to come by. And don't forget that Boot Camp will come with your Mac, so you can always throw a copy of Windows on there should you need it.

I hope you enjoy your MBP. :)

-Emily

I just bought a 27" to hook my Macbook up to a few months ago, and it works beautifully. You generally need an adapter, but those aren't hard to come by. And don't forget that Boot Camp will come with your Mac, so you can always throw a copy of Windows on there should you need it.

I hope you enjoy your MBP. :)

-Emily

Sounds like I won't miss a thing! :)

I assume since you're taking computer science I assume part of programming beyond the first year will involve using Visual Studio; as desirable as Mac OS X is, it just isn't worth being out of step when it comes to doing computer science and having to always be the odd man out when it comes to programming. At the end of the day it is about having the right tool for the job - with that being said I guess it depends on what your programming course entails.

What ever choice you do make, research heavily into what your degree requirements are - the last thing you want to go is go off to purchase a sexy machine only to find yourself incompatible with what is required.

Side note, I'm studying a liberal arts degree majoring in religious studies and philosophy so having a Mac is more than sufficient.

I assume since you're taking computer science I assume part of programming beyond the first year will involve using Visual Studio; as desirable as Mac OS X is, it just isn't worth being out of step when it comes to doing computer science and having to always be the odd man out when it comes to programming. At the end of the day it is about having the right tool for the job - with that being said I guess it depends on what your programming course entails.

What ever choice you do make, research heavily into what your degree requirements are - the last thing you want to go is go off to purchase a sexy machine only to find yourself incompatible with what is required.

Side note, I'm studying a liberal arts degree majoring in religious studies and philosophy so having a Mac is more than sufficient.

With Boot Camp allowing him to dual boot into Windows, that shouldn't be an issue at all. Admittedly, I don't know too much about Computer Science and programming, but in my experience--as a graphic designer with a programmer boyfriend--any Microsoft-based tools you require on a Mac can generally be used--whether through dual booting, or not--or a decent Mac-specific replacement can be found.

With Boot Camp allowing him to dual boot into Windows, that shouldn't be an issue at all. Admittedly, I don't know too much about Computer Science and programming, but in my experience--as a graphic designer with a programmer boyfriend--any Microsoft-based tools you require on a Mac can generally be used--whether through dual booting, or not--or a decent Mac-specific replacement can be found.

If you're going to spend 90% of your time using Windows then you might as well get a computer preloaded with Windows - Windows running on Mac is just plain horrible, the drivers are poorly optimised, chew through battery power etc.

I've used a Mac for my first 2 years at University and its been awesome. I recently sold it because I got good money considering it was aging and bought a pretty good PC laptop. Ugh, what a mistake...computing just isn't the same.

I'll be picking up a MBP in the next week or two. :)

but still i didnt get there point what "Special" is in macs for graphics work? nowdays PC and Macs share same hardware......so whats the difference? thats question is annoying me from long time.......

When I ask designers that question, it usually boils down to the fact that OS X is more elegant than Windows. If your profession is design, you tend to be very sensitive to these things. Very subjective, I know, but this is the feedback that I get.

When I ask designers that question, it usually boils down to the fact that OS X is more elegant than Windows. If your profession is design, you tend to be very sensitive to these things. Very subjective, I know, but this is the feedback that I get.

For me, I am not a designer but I do think that the ascetics of the user interface are important - if I don't feel comfortable using something I'm going to be less productive. If you use something for a long period of time each day then you'll want it to be as comfortable as possible - just as a trucker will want a seat that is comfortable for long driving or someone who enjoys driving having his/her car outfitted with the things he/she likes.

I've never felt comfortable running Windows so I own a Mac - nothing to do with some sort of 'objective superiority', but rather for me I find it superior (subjective/situational).

When I ask designers that question, it usually boils down to the fact that OS X is more elegant than Windows. If your profession is design, you tend to be very sensitive to these things. Very subjective, I know, but this is the feedback that I get.

This has being done to death. But its nothing of the sort. Its down to decades ago the Mac platform was the only viable option to have if you was in desktop publishing. They was way ahead of Windows in that area at the time and had developments not available on windows, postscript, laserprinters, quark, freehand, photoshop, etc.

Now its more down to tradition and what you know, brought up through design college using Macs then their way tends to feel more natural then windows, I assume its the otherway round with someone brought up on Windows.

This has being done to death. But its nothing of the sort. Its down to decades ago the Mac platform was the only viable option to have if you was in desktop publishing. They was way ahead of Windows in that area at the time and had developments not available on windows, postscript, laserprinters, quark, freehand, photoshop, etc.

Now its more down to tradition and what you know, brought up through design college using Macs then their way tends to feel more natural then windows, I assume its the otherway round with someone brought up on Windows.

I have at least three designer friends who were "brought up" on Windows, and who have switched to Macs. All of them owned PCs in uni, and switched to Macs a year of two after they started working. I'm merely repeating the feedback I got from them.

Having said that, I have experienced first hand how schools can be biased towards a platform. I studied multimedia and computer science in uni. The school of design was extremely pro-Mac and anti-PC. The school of CS was the opposite. Very pro-PC and anti-Mac. I didn't own a Mac in uni. I actually hated them. Ironically, I am now a developer, but prefer Macs.

Ditto, I had to endure some ridicule during college regarding my Mac choice when I was doing CS. In the end, the muttering stopped because more and more of my school mates started being seen with Macs and soon enough the school introduced an Apple development course and outfitted the school with 200+ Mac Pros.

Times are a-changing.

I assume since you're taking computer science I assume part of programming beyond the first year will involve using Visual Studio; as desirable as Mac OS X is, it just isn't worth being out of step when it comes to doing computer science and having to always be the odd man out when it comes to programming. At the end of the day it is about having the right tool for the job - with that being said I guess it depends on what your programming course entails.

Funny thing is when I did my Computer Science degree (2002-2007) my school was all WinXP EXCEPT for the computer science dept which was all UNIX and Linux. Having a MBP was AWESOME as it's way easier to make sure my assignments etc were going to run on the school's computer (we used make, gcc etc etc, they can run on Windows but I found it was better on OSX).

Also I could ssh into school from home and run GUI apps through X11, that saved me quite a few trips back to school :)

I got my MBP yesterday and I absolutely love it so far. I'm simply addicted to it. Way better than my dv6 which is a mid-range alternative to the high-end Envy series (GXXt being the low-end). I love everything about it, especially the high resolution. Battery life's ok. Not as great as Apple declares. 4-6 hours depending on what I do.

I also got Windows 7 running thanks to Bootcamp. Run's like a charm.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!